Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Decoding the Cornea-Glaucoma Association: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization

VA. de Vries, A. Szabo, JE. Vergroesen, S. Liu, KA. van Garderen, K. Muthusamy, P. Liskova, L. Dudakova, AP. Khawaja, SJ. Tuft, CCW. Klaver, AE. Davidson, WD. Ramdas

. 2025 ; 66 (9) : 22. [pub] 20250701

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25022485

PURPOSE: We combined classical association analyses with one-sample and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), to comprehensively assess the causal relation among central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: We analyzed data from a large population-based cohort study (the Rotterdam Study), an FECD case-control study, and genome wide association study summary statistics. We defined OAG as reproducible visual field loss, independent of IOP. Multivariable regression was performed. One-sample MR was performed using the same regression models, with the corresponding genetic risk score (GRS) as independent variable. Two-sample MR was performed using inverse variance weighted, MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods. RESULTS: In total, 303 participants with OAG and 10,598 controls from the Rotterdam Study were included, with 753 FECD cases from the FECD cohort. The odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) of OAG was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.81) per standard deviation (SD) increase in CCT (P < 0.001). However, one-sample MR showed no significant association between a CCT-GRS and OAG (P = 0.688). Two-sample MR found an OR (95% CI) of 1.23 (95% CI = 1.06-1.42) for each SD increase in the CCT instrumental variable. We observed no association between an FECD-GRS and OAG (P = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for a causal link between CCT and OAG. Nevertheless, CCT measurements are still valuable for population-based risk stratification. We found no clear relationship between FECD and OAG.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25022485
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251023080331.0
007      
ta
008      
251014s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1167/iovs.66.9.22 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40626804
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a de Vries, Victor A $u Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
245    10
$a Decoding the Cornea-Glaucoma Association: Evidence From Mendelian Randomization / $c VA. de Vries, A. Szabo, JE. Vergroesen, S. Liu, KA. van Garderen, K. Muthusamy, P. Liskova, L. Dudakova, AP. Khawaja, SJ. Tuft, CCW. Klaver, AE. Davidson, WD. Ramdas
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: We combined classical association analyses with one-sample and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR), to comprehensively assess the causal relation among central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: We analyzed data from a large population-based cohort study (the Rotterdam Study), an FECD case-control study, and genome wide association study summary statistics. We defined OAG as reproducible visual field loss, independent of IOP. Multivariable regression was performed. One-sample MR was performed using the same regression models, with the corresponding genetic risk score (GRS) as independent variable. Two-sample MR was performed using inverse variance weighted, MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods. RESULTS: In total, 303 participants with OAG and 10,598 controls from the Rotterdam Study were included, with 753 FECD cases from the FECD cohort. The odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) of OAG was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.81) per standard deviation (SD) increase in CCT (P < 0.001). However, one-sample MR showed no significant association between a CCT-GRS and OAG (P = 0.688). Two-sample MR found an OR (95% CI) of 1.23 (95% CI = 1.06-1.42) for each SD increase in the CCT instrumental variable. We observed no association between an FECD-GRS and OAG (P = 0.946). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for a causal link between CCT and OAG. Nevertheless, CCT measurements are still valuable for population-based risk stratification. We found no clear relationship between FECD and OAG.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a mendelovská randomizace $x metody $7 D057182
650    12
$a glaukom s otevřeným úhlem $x genetika $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D005902
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a celogenomová asociační studie $7 D055106
650    12
$a rohovka $x patologie $x patofyziologie $7 D003315
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a nitrooční tlak $x fyziologie $7 D007429
650    12
$a Fuchsova endoteliální dystrofie $x genetika $7 D005642
650    _2
$a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
650    _2
$a jednonukleotidový polymorfismus $7 D020641
650    _2
$a zraková pole $x fyziologie $7 D014794
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Szabo, Anita $u UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Vergroesen, Joëlle E $u Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Liu, Siyin $u UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom $u Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a van Garderen, Karin A $u Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Muthusamy, Kirithika $u Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Liskova, Petra $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dudakova, Lubica $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Khawaja, Anthony P $u NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Tuft, Stephen J $u UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom $u Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Klaver, Caroline C W $u Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands $u Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Davidson, Alice E $u UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom $u Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Ramdas, Wishal D $u Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
773    0_
$w MED00002404 $t Investigative ophthalmology & visual science $x 1552-5783 $g Roč. 66, č. 9 (2025), s. 22
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40626804 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20251014 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251023080336 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2417319 $s 1260648
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 66 $c 9 $d 22 $e 20250701 $i 1552-5783 $m Investigative ophthalmology & visual science $n Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci $x MED00002404
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20251014

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace