Two types of double-strand breaks in electron and photon tracks and their relation to exchange-type chromosome aberrations
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
8880958
DOI
10.1007/s004110050026
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chromozomální aberace * MeSH
- elektrony * MeSH
- fotony * MeSH
- poškození DNA * MeSH
- relativní biologická účinnost MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Yields of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb), i.e. the average number of dsb, N, per relative molar mass, M(r), and dose, D, produced by electrons and photons in the energy range 50 eV-1 MeV were calculated. The experimental data of dsb induction by ultrasoft x-rays and by photons agree well with the calculated yields of dsb as a function of photon energy. The dsb are classified into simple and complex ones. Energy transfers of less than about 200 eV producing at least two ionizations generate mainly simple dsb, while low-energy electrons with an initial energy between 200 and 500 eV induce preferentially complex dsb. Assuming that dsb is the main DNA lesion leading to exchange-type chromosome aberrations (etca), three different mechanisms have to be considered: 1) complex dsb on its own; 2) interaction between two dsb induced by the same primary particle; and 3) interaction between two dsb induced by different primary particles. Mechanisms 1) and 2) produce a linear term, whereas mechanism 3) leads to a quadratic term for the yield of etca. The sum of contributions 1) and 2) to the yield of dicentrics describes fairly well the non-trivial structure of the experimental data. The results suggest that interaction between complex dsb does not contribute significantly to the formation of dicentrics via mechanism 3).
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Radiat Res. 1990 Jan;121(1):21-7 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 Jan;65(1):7-17 PubMed
Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S103-11 PubMed
Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;5(4):684-91 PubMed
Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3331-6 PubMed
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1980;18(3):221-38 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1980 Nov;38(5):545-57 PubMed
Hum Genet. 1980 Feb;53(2):131-43 PubMed
Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):695-703 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1965;9(5):477-502 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Oct;50(4):727-41 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Jul;62(1):9-20 PubMed
Phys Med Biol. 1991 Feb;36(2):229-38 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 Nov;66(5):467-70 PubMed
Chromosoma. 1984;90(2):120-7 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1993 Dec;64(6):651-8 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1985 Jul;48(1):55-60 PubMed
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1993;32(3):251-8 PubMed
Radiat Environ Biophys. 1993;32(1):1-19 PubMed
Radiat Res. 1993 Jun;134(3):265-70 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jun;57(6):1141-50 PubMed
Br J Cancer. 1989 Dec;60(6):852-4 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Apr;49(4):645-56 PubMed
Radiat Res. 1989 Apr;118(1):83-92 PubMed
Mutat Res. 1991 Jul;249(1):29-35 PubMed
Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419-28 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):3153-7 PubMed
Mol Carcinog. 1991;4(3):243-7 PubMed
Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Jun;61(6):737-48 PubMed