Two types of double-strand breaks in electron and photon tracks and their relation to exchange-type chromosome aberrations

. 1996 Aug ; 35 (3) : 163-9.

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid08880958

Yields of DNA double-strand breaks (dsb), i.e. the average number of dsb, N, per relative molar mass, M(r), and dose, D, produced by electrons and photons in the energy range 50 eV-1 MeV were calculated. The experimental data of dsb induction by ultrasoft x-rays and by photons agree well with the calculated yields of dsb as a function of photon energy. The dsb are classified into simple and complex ones. Energy transfers of less than about 200 eV producing at least two ionizations generate mainly simple dsb, while low-energy electrons with an initial energy between 200 and 500 eV induce preferentially complex dsb. Assuming that dsb is the main DNA lesion leading to exchange-type chromosome aberrations (etca), three different mechanisms have to be considered: 1) complex dsb on its own; 2) interaction between two dsb induced by the same primary particle; and 3) interaction between two dsb induced by different primary particles. Mechanisms 1) and 2) produce a linear term, whereas mechanism 3) leads to a quadratic term for the yield of etca. The sum of contributions 1) and 2) to the yield of dicentrics describes fairly well the non-trivial structure of the experimental data. The results suggest that interaction between complex dsb does not contribute significantly to the formation of dicentrics via mechanism 3).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Radiat Res. 1990 Jan;121(1):21-7 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 Jan;65(1):7-17 PubMed

Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S103-11 PubMed

Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;5(4):684-91 PubMed

Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;5(12):3331-6 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 1980;18(3):221-38 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1980 Nov;38(5):545-57 PubMed

Hum Genet. 1980 Feb;53(2):131-43 PubMed

Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):695-703 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1965;9(5):477-502 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Oct;50(4):727-41 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Jul;62(1):9-20 PubMed

Phys Med Biol. 1991 Feb;36(2):229-38 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1994 Nov;66(5):467-70 PubMed

Chromosoma. 1984;90(2):120-7 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1993 Dec;64(6):651-8 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1985 Jul;48(1):55-60 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 1993;32(3):251-8 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 1993;32(1):1-19 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1993 Jun;134(3):265-70 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jun;57(6):1141-50 PubMed

Br J Cancer. 1989 Dec;60(6):852-4 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Apr;49(4):645-56 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1989 Apr;118(1):83-92 PubMed

Mutat Res. 1991 Jul;249(1):29-35 PubMed

Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419-28 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):3153-7 PubMed

Mol Carcinog. 1991;4(3):243-7 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Jun;61(6):737-48 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...