Direct PCR assay for detection of Neisseria meningitidis in human cerebrospinal fluid

. 1999 ; 44 (6) : 689-94.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid11097028

A PCR amplification was performed to detect Neisseria meningitidis insertion sequence 1106 (IS-1106) in the human CerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) in cases of meningitis. The study included 27 CSF samples from suspected meningitis patients. Although the inflammatory response in most of the samples was slightly increased, the results showed that 7 (26%) and 8 (30%) CSF samples were diagnosed as meningococcal meningitis by Gram staining and by culture, respectively. The primers of the IS-1106 were used for direct diagnosis of N. meningitidis in the human spinal fluid after a minor treatment of the CSF samples. The sample was diagnosed as meningococcal meningitis, if a DNA band of about 600 bp was detected in the ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. The 27 CSF samples were analyzed in a random manner. Of these, 18 samples including the Gram staining- and culture-positive samples were also positive in PCR amplification. However, a CSF sample, which was diagnosed to be meningococcal meningitis in culture was negative in both Gram staining and PCR analysis. The specificity of the IS-1106 primers was determined to be 95%, with 100% sensitivity in comparison to Gram staining and culture. The primers were sensitive to 10 pg or more of meningococcal DNA. In addition, the PCR amplification showed high predictive values (89 and 100%) in diagnosing meningitis in patients that were negative and positive responders when tested by culture and by Gram staining. In conclusion, the PCR amplification of IS-1106 of N. meningitidis is specific and sensitive to both culture-positive and -negative meningococcal meningitis. Hence, PCR assay is highly recommended for use in a rapid diagnosis of suspected meningitis patients.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 25;12(14):5837-52 PubMed

Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Oct;21(4):891-6 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1998;43(3):311-9 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1994 Jan;176(2):333-7 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):335-51 PubMed

Microbiol Rev. 1983 Dec;47(4):621-69 PubMed

N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):178-83 PubMed

Lancet. 1992 Dec 12;340(8833):1432-4 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Aug;36(8):2205-9 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 1992 Jun;6(11):1565-73 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1642-5 PubMed

Lancet. 1989 Nov 25;2(8674):1236-9 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):77-80 PubMed

Lancet. 1991 Jun 29;337(8757):1568-9 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2738-44 PubMed

BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):143-7 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):776-82 PubMed

Lancet. 1989 Sep 16;2(8664):677 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 May;36(5):1180-4 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Dec;28(12):2668-73 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...