Copper-resistant bacteria from industrial effluents and their role in remediation of heavy metals in wastewater

. 2002 ; 47 (1) : 43-50.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid11980269

Six copper-resistant bacterial strains were isolated from wastewater of tanneries of Kasur and Rohi Nala. Two strains tolerated copper at 380 mg/L, four up to 400 mg/L. Three strains were identified as members of the genus Salmonella; one strain was identified as Streptococcus pyrogenes, one as Vagococcus fluvialis and the last was identified as Escherichia coli. The pH and temperature optimum for two of them were 7.0 and 30 degrees C, respectively; four strains had corresponding optima at 7.5 and 37 degrees C, respectively. All bacterial isola-tes showed resistance against Ag+ (280-350 mg/L), Co2+ (200-420), CrVI (280-400), Cd2+ (250-350), Hg2+ (110-200), Mn2+ (300-380), Pb2+ (300-400), Sn2+ (480-520) and Zn2+ (300-450). Large-sized plasmids (> 20 kb), were detected in all of the strains. After the isolates were cured of plasmids with ethidium bromide, the efficiency of curing was estimated in the range of 60-90%. Reference strain of E. coli was transformed with the plasmids of the bacterial isolates which grew in Luria-Bertani medium containing 100 mg/L Cu2+. The capability to adsorb and afterwards accumulate Cu2+ inside their cells was assayed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer; all bacterial cells had the ability to adsorb 50-80% of the Cu2+ and accumulate 30-45% Cu2+ inside them after 1 d of incubation.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Microbiology (Reading). 1996 Aug;142 ( Pt 8):2137-44 PubMed

J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998 Jan;20(1):1-12 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1972 Dec;112(3):1177-83 PubMed

Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 Apr;54(4):614-9 PubMed

J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Jul;134(7):1977-81 PubMed

Indian J Exp Biol. 1993 Aug;31(8):682-6 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Nov;50(5):1262-7 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Sep;102 Suppl 3:107-13 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 1996 May;147(4):287-96 PubMed

Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 1994 May-Jun;(3):3-9 PubMed

Dev Toxicol Environ Sci. 1982;9:279-303 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Jan;59(1):60-6 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):2771-6 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(3):275-8 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7315-20 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 1993 Jan;7(1):1-5 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 1995 Mar;15(6):1127-37 PubMed

Microbiol Rev. 1983 Sep;47(3):361-409 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(1):50-4 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1985 Jun;162(3):1100-5 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Apr;78(4):2110-4 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Aug;14(4):405-14 PubMed

Gene. 1996 Nov 7;179(1):9-19 PubMed

Biodegradation. 1997;8(2):113-24 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Apr;59(4):1018-24 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(3):217-20 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Dec;55(12):3143-9 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Jul;62(7):2629-35 PubMed

J Ind Microbiol. 1995 Feb;14(2):61-75 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(6):555-60 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 1995 Jan;15(1):97-106 PubMed

Microbiol Rev. 1984 Jun;48(2):95-124 PubMed

J Ind Microbiol. 1995 Feb;14(2):186-99 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(4):331-4 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1995 Aug;177(15):4207-15 PubMed

Trends Biotechnol. 1991 Jan;9(1):17-24 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994 Aug;14(4):381-6 PubMed

Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:753-89 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Aug;59(8):2531-7 PubMed

Science. 1984 Sep 7;225(4666):1043-6 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1997;42(5):441-4 PubMed

Mikrobiol Z. 1994 Jul-Sep;56(4):16-20 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 1994 Jan;145(1):61-7 PubMed

Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 1996 Jan-Mar;38(1):45-64 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1998;43(5):453-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...