The present study describes a task testing the ability of rats to trigger operant behavior by their relative spatial position to inaccessible rotating objects. Rats were placed in a Skinner box with a transparent front wall through which they could observe one or two adjacent objects fixed on a slowly rotating arena (d = 1 m) surrounded by an immobile black cylinder. The direction of arena rotation was alternated at a sequence of different time intervals. Rats were reinforced for the first bar-press that was emitted when a radius separating the two adjacent objects or dividing a single object into two halves (pointing radius) entered a 60 degrees sector of its circular trajectory defined with respect to the stationary Skinner box (reward sector). Well trained rats emitted 62.1 +/- 3.6% of responses in a 60 degrees sector preceding the reward sector and in the first 30 degrees of the reward sector. Response rate increased only when the pointing radius was approaching the reward sector, regardless of the time elapsed from the last reward. In the extinction session, when no reward was delivered, rats responded during the whole passage of the pointing radius through the former reward sector and spontaneously decreased responding after the pointing radius left this area. This finding suggests that rats perceived the reward sector as a continuous single region. The same results were obtained when the Skinner box with the rat was orbiting around the immobile scene. It is concluded that rats can recognize and anticipate their position relative to movable objects.

Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Memory Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Videnska 1083 142 20 Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Morris R B. Learn Motiv. 1981;12:239–261.

Olton D S, Samuelson R J. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes. 1976;2:97–116.

Whishaw I Q, Maaswinkel H. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3050–3058. PubMed PMC

Maaswinkel H, Whishaw I Q. Behav Brain Res. 1999;99:143–152. PubMed

Rossier J, Kaminsky Y, Schenk F, Bures J. Behav Neurosci. 2000;114:273–284. PubMed

Klement D, Bures J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:2946–2951. PubMed PMC

Heyes C M, Ray E D, Mitchell C J, Nokes T. Learn Motiv. 2000;31:83–98.

Ray E D, Heyes C M. Anim Cognit. 2002;5:245–252. PubMed

Akins C K, Klein E D, Zentrall T R. Anim Learn Behav. 2002;30:275–281. PubMed

Dews P. In: The Theory of Reinforcement Schedules. Schoenfeld W N, editor. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970. pp. 43–61.

Ferster C B, Skinner B F. Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1957.

Cimadevilla J M, Kaminsky Y, Fenton A A, Bures J. J Neurosci Methods. 2000;102:155–164. PubMed

Stuchlik A, Fenton A A, Bures J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;98:3537–3542. PubMed PMC

Stuchlik A, Bures J. Behav Brain Res. 2002;128:179–188. PubMed

Simpson E L, Gaffan E A. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1999;52:1–29. PubMed

Fenton A A, Wesierska M, Kaminsky Y, Bures J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11493–11498. PubMed PMC

Bures J, Fenton A A, Kaminsky Y, Zinyuk L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:343–350. PubMed PMC

Sutherland R J, Chew G L, Baker J C, Linggard R C. Psychobiology. 1987;15:48–57.

Sutherland R J, Linggard R. Behav Neural Biol. 1982;36:103–107. PubMed

Keith J R, McVety K M. Psychobiology. 1988;16:146–151.

Whishaw I Q. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1991;43:83–103. PubMed

O'Keefe J, Dostrofsky J. Brain Res. 1971;34:171–175. PubMed

Bures J, Fenton A A, Kaminsky Y, Rossier J, Sacchetti B, Zinyuk L. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 1997;352:1515–1524. PubMed PMC

Navigation in a Space With Moving Objects: Rats Can Avoid Specific Locations Defined With Respect to a Moving Robot