Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice?
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
15164271
PubMed Central
PMC3476738
DOI
10.1007/s00586-004-0738-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bederní obratle patofyziologie MeSH
- diagnostické zobrazování metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- elektrofyziologie metody MeSH
- elektromyografie metody MeSH
- fyzikální vyšetření metody MeSH
- H-reflex fyziologie MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nervové vedení fyziologie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- spinální stenóza diagnóza MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- zátěžový test MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
UNLABELLED: Neurogenic claudication (NC) is typical of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). One suspected pathophysiological mechanism underlying NC is intermittent hypoxia of cauda equina fibres resulting from venous pooling, which may lead to ischaemic nerve conduction failure and to transient clinical and electrophysiological changes after exercise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appearance of significant transient electrophysiological abnormalities after walking exercise in patients with LSS and to establish the contribution of dynamic electrophysiological examination in the differential diagnostics of patients with LSS. The study participants were 36 consecutive patients with LSS demonstrated by computed tomography (CT). The control groups included, respectively, 28 patients with diabetes mellitus and clinically manifested polyneuropathy, and 32 healthy volunteers. The LSS patients were divided into four subgroups based on the clinical severity of the disease (with respect to the presence or absence of NC in the history and pareses on neurological examination). Soleus H-reflex, tibial F-wave and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to abductor hallucis muscle were examined in all groups, before and after quantified walking on a treadmill. The electrophysiological parameters measured after an exercise treadmill test (ETT) in LSS patients and in both control groups were compared with the same parameters obtained before ETT. The study shows that the electrophysiological parameters reveal minimal but statistically significant changes after walk loading in patients with LSS (a prolongation of the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and of the latency of the soleus H-reflex). The changes in these parameters were demonstrated not only in patients with NC but also in patients without NC. More pronounced changes were found in LSS patients exhibiting chronic lower extremity pareses. CONCLUSIONS: From among a large battery of electrophysiological tests, only the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and the latency of the soleus H-reflex exhibit changes after walk loading in patients with LSS. These are minimal but statistically significant. Dynamic electrophysiological examination can illustrate the pathophysiology of NC in LSS, but from a practical point of view its contribution to the differential diagnostics of LSS or diabetic polyneuropathy is limited by an absence of established cut-off values.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Adamova B (2003) The importance of electrophysiological measurements in the diagnostics of lumbar spinal stenosis with emphasis on dynamic tests. Dissertation, Library of Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Adamova Ces Slov Neurol Neurochir. 2000;5:261.
Adamova Eur Spine J. 2002;11:54.
Adamova Eur Spine J. 2003;12:190. PubMed PMC
Airaksinen Spine. 1997;22:2278. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710010-00016. PubMed DOI
Altman DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London, p 611
Arnoldi Clin Orthop. 1976;115:4. PubMed
Baramki Eur Spine J. 1999;8:411. doi: 10.1007/s005860050196. PubMed DOI PMC
Berger Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1053. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199908)22:8<1053::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-Y. PubMed DOI
Hall Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:271. PubMed
Kondo Spine. 1989;14:862. PubMed
London Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:457. PubMed
Manganotti Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;35:323. PubMed
Ooi Spine. 1990;15:544. PubMed
Pastor Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:985. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199808)21:8<985::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-1. PubMed DOI
Penning Clin Biomech. 1992;7:3. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(92)90002-L. PubMed DOI
Porter Spine. 1996;21:2046. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609010-00024. PubMed DOI
Porter Spine. 1992;17:9. PubMed
Schonstrom J Orthop Res. 1989;7:115. PubMed
Sortland O, Magnaes B, Hauge T (1977) Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol 355 [Suppl]: 42–54 PubMed
Tang Brain. 1988;111:207. PubMed
Turner Spine. 1992;17:1. PubMed
Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, London, p 765
Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis