Fakoemulzifikace u katarakty po PPV (srovnání peroperacního prubehu fakoemulzifikace s pars plana infuzí a bez pars plana infuze)
[Phacoemulsification of cataracts after pars plana vitrectomy (comparison of phacoemulsification with pars plana infusion and without pars plana infusion)]
Language Czech Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
15185453
- MeSH
- Phacoemulsification adverse effects methods MeSH
- Lens Implantation, Intraocular MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Intraoperative Complications * MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Vitrectomy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- English Abstract MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
PURPOSE: To compare peroperative complications of standard phaco technique and phaco with pars plana infusion performed for cataract after pars plana vitrectomy. METHOD: This prospective study randomly divided group of 64 patients with cataract after PPV into group A (standard phaco, 38 patients) and group B (phaco with par olana infusion, 26 patients). The study verifies the rate of peroperative complications such as deep anterior chamber, diaphragma movement miosis, and zonular dehiscention in these two groups. RESULTS: Peroperative complications had slightly higher rate in group B (with infusion). No specific complication in group A (standard phaco) was found. CONCLUSION: Standard phaco technic without par plana infusion has at least the same level of safety as phaco with pars plana infusion.