In MRI applications where short acquisition time is necessary, the increase of acquisition speed is often at the expense of image resolution and SNR. In such cases, the newly developed parallel acquisition techniques could provide images without mentioned limitations and in reasonably shortened measurement time. A newly designed eight-channel head coil array (i-PAT coil) allowing for parallel acquisition of independently reconstructed images (GRAPPA mode) has been tested for its applicability in neuroradiology. Image homogeneity was tested in standard phantom and healthy volunteers. BOLD signal changes were studied in a group of six volunteers using finger tapping stimulation. Phantom studies revealed an important drop of signal even after the use of a normalization filter in the center of the image and an important increase of artifact power with reduction of measurement time strongly depending on the combination of acceleration parameters. The additional application of a parallel acquisition technique such as GRAPPA decreases measurement time in the range of about 30%, but further reduction is often possible only at the expense of SNR. This technique performs best in conditions in which imaging speed is important, such as CE MRA, but time resolution still does not allow the acquisition of angiograms separating the arterial and venous phase. Significantly larger areas of BOLD activation were found using the i-PAT coil compared to the standard head coil. Being an eight-channel surface coil array, peripheral cortical structures profit from high SNR as high-resolution imaging of small cortical dysplasias and functional activation of cortical areas imaged by BOLD contrast. In BOLD contrast imaging, susceptibility artifacts are reduced, but only if an appropriate combination of acceleration parameters is used.

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine ZRIR MR Videnska 1958 140 00 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2001 Jun;45(6):1066-74 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):1202-10 PubMed

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997 Feb;18(2):291-301 PubMed

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Feb;19(2):201-8; discussion 209 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 1997 Oct;38(4):591-603 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 1999 May;41(5):1009-22 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):1931-6 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2000 Aug;44(2):301-8 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jun;43(6):779-86 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2002 Dec;48(6):1011-20 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 1999 Nov;42(5):952-62 PubMed

Rofo. 2002 Jun;174(6):704-13 PubMed

Med Phys. 2001 Aug;28(8):1629-43 PubMed

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Sep;22(8):1615-9 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 2000 Oct;44(4):602-9 PubMed

Magn Reson Med. 1993 May;29(5):681-7 PubMed