A combination of ion exchange and electrochemical reduction for nitrate removal from drinking water. Part I: nitrate removal using a selective anion exchanger in the bicarbonate form with reuse of the regenerant solution
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
16042116
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- anionty analýza MeSH
- chromatografie iontoměničová MeSH
- čištění vody přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- dusičnany chemie MeSH
- elektrochemie * MeSH
- hydrogenuhličitany chemie MeSH
- iontová výměna MeSH
- kvartérní amoniové sloučeniny chemie MeSH
- měď analýza MeSH
- oxidace-redukce MeSH
- spektrofotometrie atomová MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- anionty MeSH
- dusičnany MeSH
- hydrogenuhličitany MeSH
- kvartérní amoniové sloučeniny MeSH
- měď MeSH
- triethylammonium cation MeSH Prohlížeč
The process of selective nitrate removal from drinking water by means of ion exchange was studied. A commercial strong base anion exchanger with triethylammonium (-N+Et3) functional groups was used in the bicarbonate (HCO3-) and carbonate (CO3(2-)) form. The aim of this study was to optimize ion-exchanger regeneration in view of the subsequent electrochemical reduction of nitrates in the spent regenerant solution. The effects of ion-exchanger form, concentration of regenerant solution, and presence of nitrates, chlorides, and sulphates in the regenerant solution were studied. The strong base anion exchanger in HCO3- form that was investigated was able to treat 270 bed volumes of model water solution containing 124 mg dm(-3) nitrates. To achieve adequate regeneration of the saturated anion exchanger, it is necessary to use approximately 30 bed volumes of fresh 1-M sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) regenerant solution. The presence of residual 50-mg dm(-3) nitrates in the regenerant solution, treated by electrolysis, resulted in an increase in the dose of regenerant solution to 35 bed volumes and a decrease in the subsequent sorption run of approximately 13%. The volume of applied regenerant solution was high, but the consumption of NaHCO3 for regeneration was low.