Comparison of antagonistic ability against enteropathogens by G+ and G- anaerobic dominant components of human fecal microbiota

. 2006 ; 51 (2) : 141-5.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid16821725

To confirm if anaerobic G+-components are those responsible for the function of colonization resistance, obligate anaerobic G+- and G- -bacteria from normal dominant microbiota of human feces were isolated from three successive collections and then used in in vitro assays for antagonism against two enteropathogenic bacteria. The production of inhibitory diffusible compounds was determined on supplemented BHI agar and MRS agar media for G- - and G+-bacteria, respectively. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium and Shigella sonnei were used as indicators. G+-bacteria presented a higher overall antagonistic frequency against both pathogenic bacteria (57 and 64 % for S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. sonnei, respectively) when compared to G+-microorganisms but with a quite elevated variation between volunteers (0-100 %) and collection samples (40-72 and 40-80 % for S. enterica sv. Typhimurium and S. sonnei, respectively). On the other hand, only three among 143 G- -isolates tested showed antagonistic activity. The results showed that, at least in vitro, obligate anaerobic G+-components of the dominant human fecal microbiota present a higher potential for antagonism against the enteropathogenic models tested than do G- -bacteria.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):209-12 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2005 Jun;73(6):3197-209 PubMed

J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Apr;49(4):1751-60 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(5):1058-69 PubMed

Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2001 Sep;2(2):43-53 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Sep;65(9):4264-7 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1978 May;7(5):448-53 PubMed

Infection. 1983;11 Suppl 2:S90-2 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Dec;62(12):4608-13 PubMed

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Apr;8(2):139-44 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 1998 Sep;149(8):585-94 PubMed

J Med Microbiol. 2001 Feb;50(2):161-164 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;28(4):405-40 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):2876-83 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(6):573-6 PubMed

Trends Microbiol. 1996 Nov;4(11):430-5 PubMed

Annu Rev Nutr. 2002;22:107-38 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1981 Dec;34(3):957-69 PubMed

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Apr;21(4):340-6 PubMed

J Exp Med. 1956 Sep 1;104(3):411-8 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 1994 Jan;145(1):9-16 PubMed

Gut. 2000 Nov;47(5):646-52 PubMed

FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1993 Mar;6(2-3):235-40 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3854-9 PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

Probiotic potential of enterococci isolated from canine feed

. 2008 ; 53 (1) : 84-8. [epub] 20080515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...