Acute musculoskeletal infection: comparison of different methods for intraoperative bacterial identification
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
17026882
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- akutní nemoc MeSH
- Bacteria izolace a purifikace MeSH
- bakteriální infekce mikrobiologie chirurgie MeSH
- bakteriologické techniky MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- muskuloskeletální nemoci mikrobiologie chirurgie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Various techniques are used for detection of pathogens in musculoskeletal infection. These methods differ with respect to reliability and ease of handling. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three intraoperative techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 20 cases (18 patients) with clinically confirmed acute musculoskeletal infections, intraoperative collected swab samples, tissue samples and fluid samples injected into standard blood culture vials were used for microbiological diagnosis. Identification of bacteria, time necessary for detection and ease of handling during surgery was evaluated. RESULTS: In 19 cases bacterial growth was demonstrated using either intraoperative swabs or blood culture technique (95% sensitivity), whereas 18 tissue biopsies were positive (90% sensitivity. 27 bacterial species were isolated. In 18 instances for the swab technique, 14 instances for the tissue biopsy and 4 operations for the blood culture vials, ease of handling was rated as excellent. DISCUSSION: The study demonstrated differences between the three tested methods with respect to ease of handling. With respect to the number of detected organisms and time for their detection there are no significant differences. These last findings are in contrast to of the results of other authors. The reason for this could be that during operative dissection an accurate and specific collection of specimens from the acute deep infected soft tissues and bones independent from the type of surgical procedure is possible. Therefore, even with the swab method a high amount of microorganisms can be recovered. Especially for intraarticular infections, fluid samples injected into standard blood vials is a practical method for the surgeon. In acute musculoskeletal infections other than joint infections, there is less benefit for the blood culture vials. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative swab technique yields valid results comparable to other techniques and is an accurate technique for detection of pathogens from acute musculoskeletal infections. Key words: implant, infections, bacteriological techniques, comparative study.
Bone grafts as vancomycin carriers in local therapy of resistant infections