Representation of species-specific vocalizations in the medial geniculate body of the guinea pig
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- akční potenciály fyziologie MeSH
- akustická stimulace MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- metathalamus cytologie fyziologie MeSH
- morčata MeSH
- neurony fyziologie MeSH
- reakční čas fyziologie MeSH
- sluchová percepce fyziologie MeSH
- spektrální analýza MeSH
- vokalizace zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- vztah dávky záření a odpovědi MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- morčata MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Individual nuclei of the auditory pathway contribute in a specific way to the processing of complex acoustical signals. We investigated the responses of single neurons to typical guinea pig vocalizations (purr, chutter, chirp and whistle) in the ventral part of the medial geniculate body (MGB) of anesthetized guinea pigs. The neuronal and population peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) reflected the repetition frequency of individual phrases in the calls. The patterns of PSTHs correlated well with the sound temporal envelope in calls with short phrases (purr, chirp). The dominant onset character of the neuronal responses resulted in a lower correlation between the sound envelope and the PSTH pattern in the case of longer calls (chutter and whistle). A time-reversed version of whistle elicited on average a 13% weaker response than did the natural whistle. The rate-characteristic frequency (CF) profile provided only a coarse representation of the sound frequency spectrum without detailed information about the individual spectral peaks and their relative magnitudes. In comparison with the inferior colliculus (Suta et al. in J Neurophysiol 90:3794-3808, 2003), the processing of species-specific vocalizations in the MGB differs in: (1) a less precise representation of the temporal envelope in the case of longer calls, but not in the case of calls consisting of one or more short phrases; (2) a less precise rate-CF representation of the spectral envelope in the case of low-frequency calls, but not in the case of broad-band calls; (3) a smaller difference between the responses to natural and time-reversed whistle.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Brain Res. 2002 May 10;935(1-2):9-15 PubMed
Hear Res. 2000 Dec;150(1-2):27-42 PubMed
Bull Math Biol. 1989;51(3):337-46 PubMed
J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):1039-57 PubMed
Audiology. 1996 Nov-Dec;35(6):335-45 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):1244-62 PubMed
Physiol Res. 2000;49(3):369-78 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 1982;48(3):323-6 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;86(5):2616-20 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2684-99 PubMed
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1991 Oct-Dec;2(4):257-72 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):14019-24 PubMed
Physiol Rev. 2004 Apr;84(2):541-77 PubMed
Neurosci Lett. 1999 May 28;267(2):89-92 PubMed
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 May;85(5):1978-94 PubMed
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2004;47(4):339-41 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 1969 Jul;32(4):613-36 PubMed
Hear Res. 1999 May;131(1-2):135-52 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;90(6):3794-808 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):1723-37 PubMed
Hear Res. 1980 Aug;3(2):133-46 PubMed
Hear Res. 2005 Aug;206(1-2):177-84 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2685-706 PubMed
Eur J Neurosci. 1995 Mar 1;7(3):438-50 PubMed
J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Nov;66(5):1381-1403 PubMed
Z Tierpsychol. 1976 May;41(1):80-106 PubMed
Neurosci Res. 1994 May;19(3):303-16 PubMed
Jpn J Physiol. 1991;41(6):817-29 PubMed
Hear Res. 2005 Nov;209(1-2):97-103 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2004 May;91(5):2117-34 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):1062-6 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 15;88(24):11339-43 PubMed
J Neurosci. 2001 Nov 1;21(21):8672-9 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 1980;39(1):87-104 PubMed
Hear Res. 2005 Jun;204(1-2):115-26 PubMed