Moznosti posouzení zmen glomerulární filtrace na podklade predikcních formulí
[Possibilities of evaluation of changes of glomerular filtration rate estimated on the basis of predicting formulas]
Jazyk čeština Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu anglický abstrakt, časopisecké články
PubMed
18630613
- MeSH
- chronická nemoc MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnoty glomerulární filtrace * MeSH
- inulin MeSH
- kreatinin krev MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci ledvin patofyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vyšetření funkce ledvin MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- anglický abstrakt MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- inulin MeSH
- kreatinin MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Estimation of changes of glomerular filtration rate based on accurate measurement (GFR) and that based on predicting formulas (eGFR) could differ significantly. In this study we have tried to analyse the relationship between (eGFR)t2/(eGFR)t1 and (GFR)t2/(GFR)t1 (where t1 and t2 denote the time at the beginning and the end of the follow-up interval). METHODS: Renal clearance of inulin (Cin) was repeatedly examined in 32 patients suffering from chronic renal impairment (S(Cr) = 231 +/- 70 micromol/l). Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated on the basis of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations. RESULTS: A significant relationship between (MDRD)t2/(MDRD)t1 and (Cin)t2/(Cin)t1 (r = 0.544, p = 0.0028, R2 = 0.295) as well as between (CG)t2/(CG)t1 and (Cin)t2/(CG)t1 (r = 0.556, p = 0.0026, R2 = 0.309) was found. Average difference between (MDRD)t2/(MDRD)t1-(Cin)t2 /(Cin)t1 was 0.017 +/- 0.17 and that of (CG)t2 /(CG)t1-(Cin)t2/ (Cin)t1 was 0.024 +/- 0,18. Within +/- 0.20 of the difference (eGFR)t2/(eGFR)t1-(Cin)t2 /(Cin)t1 59 % values were found and within +/- 0.30 of this difference 75% values were recorded. Highly significant relationship was found between (MDRD)t2/(MDRD)t1 and (CG)t2/(CG)t1 (r = 0.991; p = 0.0001; R2 = 0.983). CONCLUSION: Considering these preliminary findings, predicting formulas are not sensitive sufficiently to by able to detect GFR changes lower than 30% of initial value.