Effect of sodium monensin and cinnamaldehyde on the growth and phenotypic characteristics of Prevotella bryantii and Prevotella ruminicola
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- akrolein analogy a deriváty farmakologie MeSH
- antiprotozoální látky farmakologie MeSH
- bachor mikrobiologie MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- inhibiční koncentrace 50 MeSH
- monensin farmakologie MeSH
- parazitické testy citlivosti MeSH
- Prevotella ruminicola klasifikace účinky léků růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- Prevotella klasifikace účinky léků růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- akrolein MeSH
- antiprotozoální látky MeSH
- cinnamaldehyde MeSH Prohlížeč
- monensin MeSH
Two representative strains of Gram-negative rumen bacteria from the genus Prevotella were used as model organisms in order to evaluate the effect of cinnamaldehyde (the secondary metabolite found in extracts of the Cinnamomum family) vs. sodium monensin on growth, cell size and cell protein production. Prevotella bryantii B(1)4 was found to be remarkably more resistant to the action of both compounds than Prevotella ruminicola 23. The approximate IC(50) concentrations of sodium monensin influenced the increase in cell size of both strains during growth, which was much more pronounced in the case of the B(1)4 strain. A similar effect was observed in strain B(1)4 when 1.438 mmol/L cinnamaldehyde was added to the growth medium, indicating a possible interference with cell division. The action of cinnamaldehyde on P. bryantii B(1)4 was concentration-dependent, in contrast to the effect observed on P. ruminicola 23.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 Jul 22;37(2-3):155-62 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Oct;70(10):5750-5 PubMed
Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1324-8 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):999-1007 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jul;88(7):2508-16 PubMed
J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):552-8 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec;183(23):6746-51 PubMed
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2005 Dec 21;4:20 PubMed
J Food Prot. 2002 Oct;65(10):1545-60 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):151-5 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 2000 Mar;40(3):185-9 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jun;90(6):2580-95 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Apr;27(1):65-74 PubMed
Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Jun;43(6):799-836 PubMed
J Food Prot. 1998 Jun;61(6):657-61 PubMed
Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Sep 15;74(6):831-40 PubMed
