Comparison of nisin and monensin effects on ciliate and selected bacterial populations in artificial rumen
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- bachor mikrobiologie parazitologie MeSH
- Bacteria účinky léků MeSH
- dezinficiencia aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dieta metody MeSH
- Eukaryota účinky léků MeSH
- monensin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- nisin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- ovce MeSH
- teoretické modely MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dezinficiencia MeSH
- monensin MeSH
- nisin MeSH
The effect of daily supplementation of nisin (2 mg/L), monensin (5.88 mg/L) and nisin and monensin (2 + 5.88 mg/L) on ovine ruminal ciliates and bacteria was investigated using the artificial rumen RUSITEC. Major groups in RUSITEC were Entodinium spp. and Dasytricha ruminantium. The supplementation of nisin significantly increased the population of both major ciliate groups. The supplementation of monensin significantly decreased the population of both groups. The combined effect of nisin and monensin was similar to the effect of monensin. Monensin had strong antiprotozoic effects in contrast to the stimulatory effects of nisin. D. ruminantium followed by Entodinium spp. appeared more resistant to tested compounds than other rumen ciliates. Tested additives did not significantly influence the presence and growth of amylolytic streptococci and enterococci but nisin showed a tendency to decreasing the concentration of Escherichia coli and lactobacilli.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 May;79(1):105-9 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(2):90-6 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Dec 4;71(1):1-20 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Jan;20(1):34-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):5336-42 PubMed
Vet Med (Praha). 1980 Oct;25(10):585-600 PubMed
J Food Prot. 1998 Jul;61(7):802-7 PubMed
Arch Tierernahr. 1988 Feb;38(2):153-7 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1993;38(5):383-6 PubMed
Vet Med (Praha). 1995 Nov;40(11):337-9 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 1993 Aug;76(8):2213-21 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 1999 Dec 15;53(2-3):105-13 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1995;40(3):271-3 PubMed
Eur J Biochem. 1993 Mar 1;212(2):417-22 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(3):408-12 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jan;55(1):1-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Feb;67(2):808-13 PubMed
J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1465-83 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1998;43(1):113-6 PubMed
Vet Med (Praha). 1988 Nov;33(11):699-704 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):151-5 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jul;38(1):72-7 PubMed
Vet Med (Praha). 1991 Jun;36(6):335-40 PubMed
Res Vet Sci. 1986 Sep;41(2):251-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(3):204-8 PubMed
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Jan-Feb;115(1-2):6-10 PubMed
