Effect of nisin on two cultures of rumen ciliates
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
12879756
DOI
10.1007/bf02931376
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bachor metabolismus MeSH
- bakteriociny farmakologie MeSH
- Ciliophora účinky léků růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- gramnegativní fakultativně anaerobní tyčinky růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- grampozitivní bakteriální infekce prevence a kontrola MeSH
- kyseliny mastné těkavé metabolismus MeSH
- nisin farmakologie MeSH
- ovce metabolismus MeSH
- počet mikrobiálních kolonií MeSH
- vysoká zvěř metabolismus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bakteriociny MeSH
- kyseliny mastné těkavé MeSH
- nisin MeSH
The effect of nisin (in the form of Nisaplin) was determined using two species of rumen ciliate protozoa in vitro, on their co-culture bacterial population, and volatile fatty acid concentration. Nisaplin did not affect the in vitro growth of Entodinium caudatum at concentrations of 50-400 mg/L during short-term treatment (5 d). Long-term application (30 d) of Nisaplin (100 mg/L) significantly decreased growth of the Epidinium ecaudatum forma caudatum et ecaudatum but not growth of E. caudatum. Nisaplin moderately supported the growth of E. caudatum after omission of wheat gluten (source of amino acids for protozoan growth). An inhibition of Gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacterial population in the protozoan cultures (lactobacilli, enterococci, staphylococci and amylolytic streptococci) was observed during long-term Nisaplin treatment. The concentration of volatile fatty acids significantly increased during the long-term Nisaplin treatment of both cultures. The propionate concentration in the mixture of volatile fatty acids was nearly twice higher on the account of the decreased concentration (from 74 to 63%) of acetate.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Anim Sci. 1998 Jan;76(1):275-86 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Dec 4;71(1):1-20 PubMed
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Jan-Feb;115(1-2):6-10 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(2):90-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2164-70 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Jan;20(1):34-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(3):269-74 PubMed
Eur J Biochem. 1993 Mar 1;212(2):417-22 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jun;59(2):171-200 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):171-7 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Nov;36(5):752-4 PubMed
Application of PCR, rep-PCR and RAPD techniques for typing of Lactococcus lactis strains