The methanogenic activity in the presence of Entodinium caudatum and Epidinium ecaudatum was well preserved after long-term cultivation. Microscopic observation revealed that methane production in the presence of E. caudatum was probably caused by their intracellular methanogenic activity, while methane production in the presence of E. ecaudatum f caudatum et ecaudatum could be attributed to both the methanogenic bacterial fraction of their external surface and their intracellular activity. Methane production per protozoan cell of E. caudatum and E. ecaudatum was 2.1 nmol per cell per d and 6.0 nmol per cell per d, respectively. E. caudatum was responsible for almost the entire methane production in the culture. The activity of free methanogens constituted approximately 50% of the total methane production in the E. ecaudatum culture. Decrease of digestibility of substrates and differences in the fermentation end products accompanied the inhibition of methanogenesis in both cultures by penicillin G, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, 2-bromoethanesulfonate, and pyromellitic diimide. E. caudatum appeared to be more sensitive than E. ecaudatum to the compounds tested. Hydrogen recoveries based on both volatile fatty acids and methane production suggested that the methanogenic population appeared not to be fully able to consume hydrogen produced in the protozoan cultures. The culture conditions tested were found to be suitable for experiments on the relationship between rumen ciliates and rumen bacteria.

Institute of Animal Physiology Slovak Academy of Sciences 040 01 Kosice Slovakia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Br J Nutr. 1984 Sep;52(2):261-75 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Apr 1;117(2):157-61 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Dec;23(6):389-92 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1983 Nov;156(2):516-23 PubMed

Exp Cell Res. 1964 Dec;36:439-74 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1978 Jun 13;17(12):2374-7 PubMed

Appl Microbiol. 1962 Nov;10:583-92 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Sep;40(3):608-12 PubMed

J Anim Sci. 1985 Feb;60(2):544-50 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Dec;23(6):421-5 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Aug;23(2):129-32 PubMed

J Gen Microbiol. 1969 Jun;56(3):403-8 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Oct;21(4):230-4 PubMed

J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1997 Apr;43(2):129-131 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 1983 Jun;29(6):676-80 PubMed

Arch Tierernahr. 1998;51(4):319-26 PubMed

Br J Nutr. 1982 Jan;47(1):95-9 PubMed

Br J Nutr. 1986 Sep;56(2):407-19 PubMed

Cancer Res. 1956 Jan;16(1):77-86 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Nov;36(5):752-4 PubMed

Some Aspects of the Physiology of the Nyctotherus velox, a Commensal Ciliated Protozoon Taken from the Hindgut of the Tropical Millipede Archispirostreptus gigas

Distinctive archaebacterial species associated with anaerobic rumen protozoan Entodinium caudatum

Effect of nisin on two cultures of rumen ciliates