Effect of nisin on two cultures of rumen ciliates
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
12879756
DOI
10.1007/bf02931376
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Rumen metabolism MeSH
- Bacteriocins pharmacology MeSH
- Ciliophora drug effects growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Gram-Negative Facultatively Anaerobic Rods growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections prevention & control MeSH
- Fatty Acids, Volatile metabolism MeSH
- Nisin pharmacology MeSH
- Sheep metabolism MeSH
- Colony Count, Microbial MeSH
- Deer metabolism MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Bacteriocins MeSH
- Fatty Acids, Volatile MeSH
- Nisin MeSH
The effect of nisin (in the form of Nisaplin) was determined using two species of rumen ciliate protozoa in vitro, on their co-culture bacterial population, and volatile fatty acid concentration. Nisaplin did not affect the in vitro growth of Entodinium caudatum at concentrations of 50-400 mg/L during short-term treatment (5 d). Long-term application (30 d) of Nisaplin (100 mg/L) significantly decreased growth of the Epidinium ecaudatum forma caudatum et ecaudatum but not growth of E. caudatum. Nisaplin moderately supported the growth of E. caudatum after omission of wheat gluten (source of amino acids for protozoan growth). An inhibition of Gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacterial population in the protozoan cultures (lactobacilli, enterococci, staphylococci and amylolytic streptococci) was observed during long-term Nisaplin treatment. The concentration of volatile fatty acids significantly increased during the long-term Nisaplin treatment of both cultures. The propionate concentration in the mixture of volatile fatty acids was nearly twice higher on the account of the decreased concentration (from 74 to 63%) of acetate.
See more in PubMed
J Anim Sci. 1998 Jan;76(1):275-86 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Dec 4;71(1):1-20 PubMed
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Jan-Feb;115(1-2):6-10 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(2):90-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Aug;57(8):2164-70 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Jan;20(1):34-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(3):269-74 PubMed
Eur J Biochem. 1993 Mar 1;212(2):417-22 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jun;59(2):171-200 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):171-7 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Nov;36(5):752-4 PubMed
Application of PCR, rep-PCR and RAPD techniques for typing of Lactococcus lactis strains