Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
18700375
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Alkalies MeSH
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous MeSH
- Implants, Experimental MeSH
- Hydroxides MeSH
- Dental Etching methods MeSH
- Dental Polishing MeSH
- Osseointegration MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Dogs MeSH
- Dental Prosthesis Retention * MeSH
- Wettability MeSH
- Tibia MeSH
- Titanium MeSH
- Vibration MeSH
- Dental Implants * MeSH
- Dental Prosthesis Design * MeSH
- Dental Restoration Failure MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Dogs MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Alkalies MeSH
- hydroxide ion MeSH Browser
- Hydroxides MeSH
- Titanium MeSH
- Dental Implants * MeSH
PURPOSE: This study was carried out to quantify the effect of an alkali-modified surface on implant stability during healing using an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 screw-shaped, self-tapping, commercially pure titanium dental implants, divided into a test group (implants with an alkali-modified surface or "biosurface") and a control group (implants with a turned, machined surface) were inserted without pretapping in the tibiae of 3 beagle dogs. The resonance frequency analysis method was used to measure the implant stability quotient (ISQ) 0, 1, 3, 9, and 12 weeks after implantation. The animals were sacrificed after 2, 5, and 12 weeks, and the bone-implant contact (BIC%) was evaluated histomorphometrically. RESULTS: The difference in the osseointegration rates (deltaISQ/deltahealing time) between the implants with alkali-modified surface (biosurface) and those with a turned, machined surface was evaluated as a mean of 0.843 ISQ/week within the first 9 weeks of healing. The mean increase in the secondary implant stability was found to be proportional to the mean increase in the BIC at healing period earlier than 5 weeks. DISCUSSION: The characteristics that differed between the implant surfaces, ie, specific surface area, contact angle, and hydroxylation/hydration, may represent factors that influence the rate of osseointegration and the secondary implant stability. CONCLUSION: The alkali-treated surface enhances the secondary stability in the early stages of healing compared to the turned, machined surface, as a consequence of faster BIC formation.