Morphological variability in selected heterocystous cyanobacterial strains as a response to varied temperature, light intensity and medium composition
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- dusík metabolismus MeSH
- kultivační média metabolismus MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie MeSH
- sinice cytologie růst a vývoj metabolismus účinky záření MeSH
- světlo MeSH
- teplota MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dusík MeSH
- kultivační média MeSH
The effect of temperature, light and nutrient composition on morphological traits was determined in seven nostocacean cyanobacteria (Anabaena planctonica, A. sphaerica var. conoidea, A. spiroides, Aphanizomenon gracile, Nostoc sp., Scytonema sp., and Tolypothrix sp.). Their morphological variability was high but only some of the features showed changes reflecting varied growth conditions. The frequency of heterocyst occurrence decreased with increasing nitrogen concentration. Within the range studied, the effect of temperature on heterocyst frequency of Tolypothrix sp. and planktonic Anabaena strains could be fitted by a normal curve with a clear optimum while linear correlation was found in Aphanizomenon gracile. T-and S-type branching was observed in both Scytonema sp. and Tolypothrix sp. strains. T-type branching was found to be markedly dependent on nitrogen concentration. The abundance of necridic cells of Tolypothrix sp. increased linearly with temperature and light intensity. Regularity of trichome coiling of A. spiroides depended on culture medium, suggesting that nutrient composition may be the main controlling factor. In contrast, the effect of the experimental conditions on the dimensions of vegetative cells and heterocysts was weak. Their variability was markedly higher within each experimental treatment than between treatments.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(1):61-7 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Sep;52(Pt 5):1867-80 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(4):411-8 PubMed
Bacteriol Rev. 1971 Jun;35(2):171-205 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(2):121-8 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(5):619-26 PubMed
Arch Microbiol. 1998 Jun;169(6):469-82 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(6):565-71 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Jan;55(Pt 1):11-26 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001 Mar;51(Pt 2):513-526 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007;52(6):603-17 PubMed