The effect of cerebellar transplantation and enforced physical activity on motor skills and spatial learning in adult Lurcher mutant mice

. 2009 Mar ; 8 (1) : 35-45.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid18850257

Lurcher mutant mice represent a model of olivocerebellar degeneration. They are used to investigate cerebellar functions, consequences of cerebellar degeneration and methods of therapy influencing them. The aim of the work was to assess the effect of foetal cerebellar graft transplantation, repeated enforced physical activity and the combination of both these types of treatment on motor skills, spontaneous motor activity and spatial learning ability in adult B6CBA Lurcher mice. Foetal cerebellar grafts were applied into the cerebellum of Lurchers in the form of solid tissue pieces. Enforced motor activity was realised through rotarod training. Motor functions were examined using bar, ladder and rotarod tests. Spatial learning was tested in the Morris water maze. Spontaneous motor activity in the open field was observed. The presence of the graft was examined histologically. Enforced physical activity led to moderate improvement of some motor skills and to a significant amelioration of spatial learning ability in Lurchers. The transplantation of cerebellar tissue did not influence motor functions significantly but led to an improvement of spatial learning ability. Mutual advancement of the effects of both types of treatment was not observed. Spontaneous motor activity was influenced neither by physical activity nor by the transplantation. Physical activity did not influence the graft survival and development. Because nerve sprouting and cell migration from the graft to the host cerebellum was poor, the functional effects of the graft should be explained with regard to its trophic influence rather than with any involvement of the grafted cells into neural circuitries.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):769-73 PubMed

J Comp Neurol. 1994 May 1;343(1):173-82 PubMed

Neuroscience. 1993 Jul;55(1):1-21 PubMed

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 May;3(5):401-9 PubMed

Neuroscience. 2006;139(4):1221-34 PubMed

Neuroscience. 1987 Jan;20(1):1-22 PubMed

Prague Med Rep. 2007;108(1):49-56 PubMed

J Neurosci Methods. 1984 May;11(1):47-60 PubMed

Stroke. 1997 Jun;28(6):1225-31; discussion 1231-2 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 1993 Jul;122(1):165-70 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 7;26(23):6230-7 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 2006 Oct;201(2):281-92 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(4):1135-9 PubMed

J Neurosci. 1997 Apr 1;17(7):2400-7 PubMed

Cell Transplant. 1996 Mar-Apr;5(2):269-77 PubMed

Arch Neurol. 2001 Mar;58(3):498-504 PubMed

Prague Med Rep. 2005;106(1):79-84 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 1999 Aug;158(2):301-11 PubMed

Behav Genet. 1998 Jul;28(4):299-308 PubMed

Neuroscience. 1997 Sep;80(1):175-90 PubMed

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993 Dec 30;197(3):1267-76 PubMed

Brain Res. 1988 Jul 5;455(1):24-30 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 1995 Aug;134(2):273-6 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Oct 11;287(1020):167-201 PubMed

Neuroreport. 1995 Oct 2;6(14):1827-32 PubMed

Brain Res. 1976 Jul 30;111(2):396-8 PubMed

Physiol Behav. 1992 Mar;51(3):523-5 PubMed

Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):493-5 PubMed

Brain Res. 1993 Aug 13;619(1-2):111-9 PubMed

Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Feb;21(4):979-88 PubMed

Brain Res. 1982 Nov 4;250(2):358-62 PubMed

Behav Brain Res. 2004 Apr 2;150(1-2):65-72 PubMed

J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1982 Apr;68:87-98 PubMed

Brain Res Bull. 1997;44(3):229-32 PubMed

Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jan;19(1):159-68 PubMed

Neuroscience. 1993 May;54(1):69-92 PubMed

Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Dec;35(4):291-303 PubMed

Behav Genet. 1994 Nov;24(6):497-501 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 2003 Nov;184(1):274-84 PubMed

Exp Brain Res. 1999 Oct;128(4):535-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace