Intracerebellar application of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive stem cells to Lurcher mutant and wild type B6CBA mice
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
22534699
PubMed Central
PMC3560625
DOI
10.12659/msm.882726
PII: 882726
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- mozeček cytologie MeSH
- mutantní kmeny myší MeSH
- myši MeSH
- nádorové kmenové buňky cytologie MeSH
- nervové kmenové buňky cytologie MeSH
- přežívání štěpu MeSH
- transplantace kmenových buněk * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Neurotransplantation has great potential for future treatments of various neurodegenerative disorders. Preclinically, the Lurcher mutant mouse represents an appropriate model of genetically-determined olivocerebellar degeneration. The aim of the present study was to assess survival of naïve and neurally differentiated P19 carcinoma stem cells following transplantation into the cerebellum of Lurcher mice and wild type littermates. MATERIAL/METHODS: Adult normal wild type (n=51) and Lurcher mutant mice (n=87) of the B6CBA strain were used. The mean age of the animals at the time of transplantation was 261.5 days. Suspension of naive and neurally differentiated P19 carcinoma stem cells was injected into the cerebellum of the mice. In the Lurcher mutants, 2 depths of graft injection were used. Three weeks after implantation the brains of experimental animals were examined histologically. RESULTS: Survival of neuroprogenitor grafts at a depth of 1.6 mm was significantly higher in wild type vs. Lurcher mutant mice. In wild type mice, the typical graft localization was in the middle of the cerebellum, whereas in Lurcher mice the graft was never found inside the degenerated cerebellum and was primarily localized in the mesencephalon. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the appearance and low survival rate of cerebellar P19 carcinoma stem cell grafts in the Lurcher mutant mice weigh against the therapeutic value of this cell line in preclinical studies of neurodegeneration.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Garbuzova-Davis S, Willing AE, Milliken M, et al. Positive effect of transplantation of hNT neurons (NTera 2/D1 cell-line) in a model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Neurol. 2002;174:169–80. PubMed
Borlongan CV, Tajima Y, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved human embryonal carcinoma-derived neurons (NT2N cells) promotes functional recovery in ischemic rats. Exp Neurol. 1998;149:310–21. PubMed
Saporta S, Makoui AS, Willing AE, et al. Functional recovery after complete contusion injury to the spinal cord and transplantation of human neuroteratocarcinoma neurons in rats. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(1 Suppl):63–68. PubMed
Meltzer CC, Kondziolka D, Villemagne VL, et al. Serial [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after human neuronal implantation for stroke. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:586–91. PubMed
Kondziolka D, Steinberg GK, Wechsler L, et al. Neurotransplantation for patients with subcortical motor stroke: a phase 2 randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:38–45. PubMed
Hara K, Matsukawa N, Yasuhara T, et al. Transplantation of post-mitotic human neuroteratocarcinoma-overexpressing Nurr1 cells provides therapeutic benefits in experimental stroke: in vitro evidence of expedited neuronal differentiation and GDNF secretion. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:1240–51. PubMed
Baker KA, Hong M, Sadi D, Mendez I. Intrastriatal and intranigral grafting of hNT neurons in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2000;162:350–60. PubMed
Hurlbert MS, Gianani RI, Hutt C, et al. Neural transplantation of hNT neurons for Huntington’s disease. Cell Transplant. 1999;8:143–51. PubMed
Manto MU. The wide spectrum of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) Cerebellum. 2005;4:2–6. PubMed
Manto M, Marmolino D. Cerebellar disorders – at the crossroad of molecular pathways and diagnosis. Cerebellum. 2009a;8:417–22. PubMed
Lalonde R, Strazielle C. Spontaneous and induced mouse mutations with cerebellar dysfunctions: Behavior and neurochemistry. Brain Res. 2007;1140:51–74. PubMed
Manto M, Marmolino D. Animal models of human cerebellar ataxias: a cornerstone for the therapies of the twenty-first century. Cerebellum. 2009b;8:137–54. PubMed
Sajan SA, Waimey KE, Millen KJ. Novel approaches to studying the genetic basis of cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2010;9:272–83. PubMed PMC
Underwood BR, Rubinsztein DC. Spinocerebellar ataxias caused by polyglutamine expansions: A review of therapeutic strategies. Cerebellum. 2008;7:215–21. PubMed
Marmolino D, Manto M. Past, present and future therapeutics for cerebellar ataxias. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2010;8:41–61. PubMed PMC
Louboutin J-P, Reyes BAS, Van Bockstaele EJ, Strayer DS. Gene transfer to the cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2010;9:587–97. PubMed
Rossi F, Cattaneo E. Neural stem cell therapy for neurological diseases: dreams and reality. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:401–9. PubMed
Phillips RJS. ‘Lurcher’. A new gene in linkage group XI of the house mouse. J Genet. 1960;57:35–42.
Zuo J, De Jager PL, Takahasi KJ, et al. Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation of δ2 glutamate receptor gene. Nature. 1997;388:769–73. PubMed
Araki K, Meguro H, Kushiya E, et al. Selective expression of the glutamate receptor channel delta 2 subunit in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197:1267–76. PubMed
Caddy KWT, Biscoe TJ. Structural and quantitative studies on the normal C3H and Lurcher mutant mouse. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 1979;287:167–201. PubMed
Zanjani SH, Selimi F, Vogel MW, et al. Survival of interneurons and parallel fiber synapses in a cerebellar cortex deprived of Purkinje cells: studies in the double mutant mouse Grid2Lc/−;Bax−/−. J Comp Neurol. 2006;497:622–35. PubMed
Wetts R, Herrup K. Interaction of granule, Purkinje and inferior olivary neurons in lurcher chimeric mice. I. Qualitative studies. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1982a;68:87–98. PubMed
Wetts R, Herrup K. Interaction of granule, Purkinje and inferior olivary neurons in lurcher chimeric mice. II. Granule cell death. Brain Res. 1982b;250:358–62. PubMed
Cheng SS, Heintz N. Massive loss of mid- and hindbrain neurons during embryonic development of homozygous Lurcher mice. J Neurosci. 1997;17:2400–7. PubMed PMC
Resibois A, Cuvelier L, Goffinet AM. Abnormalities in the cerebellum and brainstem in homozygous Lurcher mice. Neuroscience. 1997;80:75–90. PubMed
Fortier P, Smith AM, Rossignol S. Locomotor deficits in the cerebellar mutant mouse, Lurcher. Exp Brain Res. 1987;66:271–86. PubMed
Lalonde R, Botez MI, Joyal CC, Caumartin M. Motor abnormalities in Lurcher mutant mice. Physiol Behav. 1992;51:523–25. PubMed
Krizkova A, Vozeh F. Development of early motor learning and topical motor skills in a model of cerebellar degeneration. Behav Brain Res. 2004;150:65–72. PubMed
Lalonde R, Lamarre Y, Smith AM. Does the mutant mouse lurcher have deficits in spatially oriented behaviours? Brain Res. 1988;455:24–30. PubMed
Lalonde R, Thifault S. Absence of an association between motor coordination and spatial orientation in lurcher mutant mice. Behav Genet. 1994;24:497–501. PubMed
Porras-Garcia E, Cendelin J, Dominguez-del-Toro E, et al. Purkinje cell loss affects differentially the execution, acquisition and prepulse inhibition of skeletal and facial motor responses in Lurcher mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:979–88. PubMed
Cendelin J, Korelusova I, Vozeh F. The effect of repeated rotarod training on motor skills and spatial learning ability in Lurcher mutant mice. Behav Brain Res. 2008;189:65–74. PubMed
Porras-Garcia E, Sanchez-Campusano R, Martinez-Vargas D, et al. Behavioral Characteristics, Associative Learning Capabilities, and Dynamic Association Mapping in an Animal Model of Cerebellar Degeneration. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:346–65. PubMed
Vogel MW, Caston J, Yuzaki M, Mariani J. The Lurcher mouse: Fresh insights from an old mutant. Brain Res. 2007;1140:4–18. PubMed
Lalonde R, Strazielle C. Spontaneous and induced mouse mutations with cerebellar dysfunctions: Behavior and neurochemistry. Brain Res. 2007;1140:51–74. PubMed
Cendelin J, Vozeh F. Lurcher mouse. In: Manto M, Gruol DL, Schmahmann JD, et al., editors. Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders. LLC. Springer Science+Business Media; 2012. in press. DOI
Houdek Z, Cendelin J, Kulda V, et al. The comparison of P19-derived neuroprogenitors and naive cells survival after the intracerebellar application in B6CBA mice. Folia Biol Prague. 2011;57:162–59. PubMed
McBurney MW, Rogers BJ. Isolation of male embryonal carcinoma cells and their chromosome replication patterns. Dev Biol. 1982;89:503–8. PubMed
Pachernik J, Bryja V, Esner M, et al. Neural differentiation of pluripotent mouse embryonal carcinoma cells by retinoic acid: inhibitory effect of serum. Physiol Res. 2005;54:115–22. PubMed
Babuska V, Kulda V, Houdek Z, et al. Characterization of P19 cells during retinoic acid induced differentiation. Prague Med Rep. 2010;111:288–98. PubMed
Tomey DA, Heckroth JA. Transplantation of normal embryonic cerebellar cell suspensions into the cerebellum of Lurcher mutant mice. Exp Neurol. 1993;122:165–70. PubMed
Cendelin J, Korelusova I, Vozeh F. A preliminary study of solid embryonic cerebellar graft survival in adult B6CBA Lurcher mutant and wild type mice. Anat Rec. 2009a;292:1986–92. PubMed
Carletti B, Rossi F. Selective rather than inductive mechanisms favour specific replacement of Purkinje cells by embryonic cerebellar cells transplanted to the cerebellum of adult Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd) mutant mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1001–12. PubMed
Cendelin J, Korelusova I, Vozeh F. The effect of cerebellar transplantation and enforced physical activity on motor skills and spatial learning in adult Lurcher mutant mice. Cerebellum. 2009b;8:35–45. PubMed
Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes
Embryonic Cerebellar Graft Morphology Differs in Two Mouse Models of Cerebellar Degeneration
Transplantation of Embryonic Cerebellar Grafts Improves Gait Parameters in Ataxic Lurcher Mice