Female sexual arousal disorder with and without a distress criterion: prevalence and correlates in a representative Czech sample
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
19758283
DOI
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01498.x
PII: S1743-6095(15)32351-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- depresivní poruchy diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- koitus fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- masturbace epidemiologie psychologie MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pozornost MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sexuální chování psychologie MeSH
- sexuální dysfunkce psychické diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Sexual medicine would benefit from large representative surveys examining the prevalence of genital female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) symptoms (with and without the increasingly controversial distress criterion), as well as novel FSAD correlates and potential "protective" factors. AIMS: To examine the extent to which genital FSAD symptoms, with and without a distress criterion, are associated with both historical and current aspects of sexual behavior. METHODS: In a representative sample of the Czech population (aged 15-88), 1,000 women were asked whether they currently have impaired lubrication and vaginal swelling (and if so, if this produces marked distress or interpersonal difficulty). They provided details of vaginal orgasm (induced by penile-vaginal intercourse [PVI] without clitoral masturbation) consistency, feelings during their first PVI, estimates of their typical foreplay and PVI durations, their degree of mental focus on vaginal sensations during PVI, among other factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The current prevalence of FSAD with and without a distress criterion and their associations with current and antecedent sexual behaviors and responses. RESULTS: The current prevalence of FSAD was 10.3% without, plus 7.5% with a distress criterion (which tended to be associated with more impairments than without distress). History of vaginal orgasm (odds ratio = 2.78), never masturbating (odds ratio = 2.4), not having felt pain and discomfort on first PVI (odds ratio = 2.27), and not having frequent anal intercourse are protective against FSAD with distress, but not without distress. Age (especially over 50) and inadequate focusing of mental attention on vaginal sensations during PVI are associated with increased FSAD risk both with and without distress. CONCLUSIONS: FSAD with and without distress appear to be different entities to some extent, with the distressed group showing more long-term signs of psychosexual impairment. We suggest that FSAD with and without distress be considered two different disorders.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org