Molecular evidence for the existence of cryptic species assemblages of several myxosporeans (Myxozoa)
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Myxozoa classification genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Fish Diseases parasitology MeSH
- Parasitic Diseases, Animal parasitology MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- DNA, Protozoan genetics MeSH
- DNA, Ribosomal genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Fishes parasitology MeSH
- Base Sequence MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- DNA, Protozoan MeSH
- DNA, Ribosomal MeSH
Myxosporeans Chloromyxum cristatum, Chloromyxum fluviatile and Zschokkella nova (Myxozoa) are common gall bladder parasites of the cyprinid fishes frequently persisting as co-infections. Despite the fact that they are believed to be innocuous endocommensals, C. cristatum clearly displays the potential of a serious pathogen since it may pervade fish liver parenchyma and cause its necrosis. Employing the comparison of genetic distances among the myxosporean rDNA sequences and performing phylogenetic analyses, we demonstrate that cryptic species assemblages exist in C. fluviatile and Z. nova. Sequence comparison revealed that Chloromyxum legeri, previously assigned as a junior synonym of C. fluviatile, is a valid species. The same method is used to display the distinction of Z. nova isolates from China and the Czech Republic. We show that C. cristatum is not an assemblage of more species, and our results support the synonymy of Chloromyxum cyprini with C. cristatum. We have developed a multiplex PCR as an effective tool for the detection and discrimination of Z. nova, C. cristatum, and C. fluviatile. It is especially advantageous for the distinction of the non-mature plasmodia of both Chloromyxum species. This method also helped to assess the exact prevalence of these parasites in examined samples and enabled to select single-infected host samples for the intended population studies.
See more in PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2006 Jun;99(1):90-6 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Oct;53(1):81-93 PubMed
Mol Cell Probes. 2003 Feb;17(1):33-9 PubMed
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1991;38(1):11-21 PubMed
Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):116-8 PubMed
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2006 Mar;53(1):1-36 PubMed
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4 PubMed
Angew Parasitol. 1983 Feb;24(1):1-14 PubMed
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2004 Jun;51(2-3):211-4 PubMed
Front Zool. 2007 Feb 16;4:6 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2006 Apr;92(2):357-63 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Apr 25;12(8):3563-83 PubMed
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 2006 Dec;36(14):1521-34 PubMed
Unraveling the mystery of a myxozoan parasite of the trout: redescription of Chloromyxum schurovi
Biodiversity and host-parasite cophylogeny of Sphaerospora (sensu stricto) (Cnidaria: Myxozoa)