• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors

D. Fischerova, G. Santos, L. Wong, V. Yulzari, RJ. Bennett, P. Dundr, A. Burgetova, P. Barsa, G. Szabó, N. Sousa, U. Scovazzi, D. Cibula

. 2023 ; 62 (5) : 727-738. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu přehledy, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24000934

Grantová podpora
UNCE 204065 and COOPERATIO Charles University in Prague
MH CZ-DRO-VFN641165 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
NV19-03-00552 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors (PNSTs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at a single gynecologic oncology center between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022. All ultrasound images, videoclips and final histological specimens of benign PNSTs were reviewed side-by-side in order to: describe the ultrasound appearance of the tumors, using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) groups, following a predefined ultrasound assessment form; describe their origin in relation to nerves and pelvic anatomy; and assess the association between their ultrasound features and histotopography. A review of the literature reporting benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNSTs with preoperative ultrasound examination was performed. RESULTS: Five women (mean age, 53 years) with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST were identified, four with a schwannoma and one with a neurofibroma, of which all were sporadic and solitary. All patients had good-quality ultrasound images and videoclips and final biopsy of surgically excised tumors, except one patient managed conservatively who had only a core needle biopsy. In all cases, the findings were incidental. The five PNSTs ranged in maximum diameter from 31 to 50 mm. All five PNSTs were solid, moderately vascular tumors, with non-uniform echogenicity, well-circumscribed by hyperechogenic epineurium and with no acoustic shadowing. Most of the masses were round (n = 4 (80%)), and contained small, irregular, anechoic, cystic areas (n = 3 (60%)) and hyperechogenic foci (n = 5 (100%)). In the woman with a schwannoma in whom surgery was not performed, follow-up over a 3-year period showed minimal growth (1.5 mm/year) of the mass. We also summarize the findings of 47 cases of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and neurofibroma identified in a literature search. CONCLUSIONS: On ultrasound examination, no imaging characteristics differentiate reliably between benign schwannomas and neurofibromas. Moreover, benign PNSTs show some similar features to malignant retroperitoneal tumors. They are solid lesions with intralesional blood vessels and show degenerative changes such as cystic areas and hyperechogenic foci. Therefore, ultrasound-guided biopsy may play a pivotal role in their diagnosis. If confirmed to be benign PNSTs, these tumors can be managed conservatively, with ultrasound surveillance. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24000934
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213093511.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/uog.26223 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37058402
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Fischerova, D $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272243218 $7 xx0074804
245    10
$a Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors / $c D. Fischerova, G. Santos, L. Wong, V. Yulzari, RJ. Bennett, P. Dundr, A. Burgetova, P. Barsa, G. Szabó, N. Sousa, U. Scovazzi, D. Cibula
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors (PNSTs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at a single gynecologic oncology center between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022. All ultrasound images, videoclips and final histological specimens of benign PNSTs were reviewed side-by-side in order to: describe the ultrasound appearance of the tumors, using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) groups, following a predefined ultrasound assessment form; describe their origin in relation to nerves and pelvic anatomy; and assess the association between their ultrasound features and histotopography. A review of the literature reporting benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNSTs with preoperative ultrasound examination was performed. RESULTS: Five women (mean age, 53 years) with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST were identified, four with a schwannoma and one with a neurofibroma, of which all were sporadic and solitary. All patients had good-quality ultrasound images and videoclips and final biopsy of surgically excised tumors, except one patient managed conservatively who had only a core needle biopsy. In all cases, the findings were incidental. The five PNSTs ranged in maximum diameter from 31 to 50 mm. All five PNSTs were solid, moderately vascular tumors, with non-uniform echogenicity, well-circumscribed by hyperechogenic epineurium and with no acoustic shadowing. Most of the masses were round (n = 4 (80%)), and contained small, irregular, anechoic, cystic areas (n = 3 (60%)) and hyperechogenic foci (n = 5 (100%)). In the woman with a schwannoma in whom surgery was not performed, follow-up over a 3-year period showed minimal growth (1.5 mm/year) of the mass. We also summarize the findings of 47 cases of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and neurofibroma identified in a literature search. CONCLUSIONS: On ultrasound examination, no imaging characteristics differentiate reliably between benign schwannomas and neurofibromas. Moreover, benign PNSTs show some similar features to malignant retroperitoneal tumors. They are solid lesions with intralesional blood vessels and show degenerative changes such as cystic areas and hyperechogenic foci. Therefore, ultrasound-guided biopsy may play a pivotal role in their diagnosis. If confirmed to be benign PNSTs, these tumors can be managed conservatively, with ultrasound surveillance. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a retroperitoneální nádory $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012186
650    12
$a nádory nervové pochvy $x diagnóza $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D018317
650    12
$a neurofibrom $x diagnóza $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D009455
650    12
$a neurilemom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D009442
650    _2
$a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
650    12
$a nádory pánve $7 D010386
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Santos, G $u Institute for Women's Health, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines
700    1_
$a Wong, L $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000318216523
700    1_
$a Yulzari, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
700    1_
$a Bennett, R J $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dundr, P $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289406124 $7 xx0080436
700    1_
$a Burgetova, A $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299752338 $7 xx0163957
700    1_
$a Barsa, P $u Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000159653119
700    1_
$a Szabó, G $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary $1 https://orcid.org/0000000285738260
700    1_
$a Sousa, N $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
700    1_
$a Scovazzi, U $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and University of Genoa, Genova, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000209898123
700    1_
$a Cibula, D $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163879356 $7 jo20000074072
773    0_
$w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 62, č. 5 (2023), s. 727-738
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37058402 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213093508 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049516 $s 1210628
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 62 $c 5 $d 727-738 $e - $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
GRA    __
$a UNCE 204065 and COOPERATIO $p Charles University in Prague
GRA    __
$a MH CZ-DRO-VFN641165 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a NV19-03-00552 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...