-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors
D. Fischerova, G. Santos, L. Wong, V. Yulzari, RJ. Bennett, P. Dundr, A. Burgetova, P. Barsa, G. Szabó, N. Sousa, U. Scovazzi, D. Cibula
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu přehledy, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
UNCE 204065 and COOPERATIO
Charles University in Prague
MH CZ-DRO-VFN641165
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
NV19-03-00552
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
37058402
DOI
10.1002/uog.26223
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory nervové pochvy * diagnóza patologie chirurgie MeSH
- nádory pánve * MeSH
- neurilemom * diagnostické zobrazování patologie MeSH
- neurofibrom * diagnóza patologie chirurgie MeSH
- retroperitoneální nádory * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- ultrasonografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors (PNSTs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at a single gynecologic oncology center between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022. All ultrasound images, videoclips and final histological specimens of benign PNSTs were reviewed side-by-side in order to: describe the ultrasound appearance of the tumors, using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) groups, following a predefined ultrasound assessment form; describe their origin in relation to nerves and pelvic anatomy; and assess the association between their ultrasound features and histotopography. A review of the literature reporting benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNSTs with preoperative ultrasound examination was performed. RESULTS: Five women (mean age, 53 years) with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST were identified, four with a schwannoma and one with a neurofibroma, of which all were sporadic and solitary. All patients had good-quality ultrasound images and videoclips and final biopsy of surgically excised tumors, except one patient managed conservatively who had only a core needle biopsy. In all cases, the findings were incidental. The five PNSTs ranged in maximum diameter from 31 to 50 mm. All five PNSTs were solid, moderately vascular tumors, with non-uniform echogenicity, well-circumscribed by hyperechogenic epineurium and with no acoustic shadowing. Most of the masses were round (n = 4 (80%)), and contained small, irregular, anechoic, cystic areas (n = 3 (60%)) and hyperechogenic foci (n = 5 (100%)). In the woman with a schwannoma in whom surgery was not performed, follow-up over a 3-year period showed minimal growth (1.5 mm/year) of the mass. We also summarize the findings of 47 cases of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and neurofibroma identified in a literature search. CONCLUSIONS: On ultrasound examination, no imaging characteristics differentiate reliably between benign schwannomas and neurofibromas. Moreover, benign PNSTs show some similar features to malignant retroperitoneal tumors. They are solid lesions with intralesional blood vessels and show degenerative changes such as cystic areas and hyperechogenic foci. Therefore, ultrasound-guided biopsy may play a pivotal role in their diagnosis. If confirmed to be benign PNSTs, these tumors can be managed conservatively, with ultrasound surveillance. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Central Military Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital de Braga Braga Portugal
Department of Neurosurgery Neurocenter Regional Hospital Liberec Liberec Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Monash University and Monash Health Clayton Australia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sheba Medical Center Ramat Gan Israel
Institute for Women's Health The Medical City Pasig City Philippines
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24000934
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240213093511.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/uog.26223 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37058402
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fischerova, D $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272243218 $7 xx0074804
- 245 10
- $a Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors / $c D. Fischerova, G. Santos, L. Wong, V. Yulzari, RJ. Bennett, P. Dundr, A. Burgetova, P. Barsa, G. Szabó, N. Sousa, U. Scovazzi, D. Cibula
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors (PNSTs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at a single gynecologic oncology center between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022. All ultrasound images, videoclips and final histological specimens of benign PNSTs were reviewed side-by-side in order to: describe the ultrasound appearance of the tumors, using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) groups, following a predefined ultrasound assessment form; describe their origin in relation to nerves and pelvic anatomy; and assess the association between their ultrasound features and histotopography. A review of the literature reporting benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNSTs with preoperative ultrasound examination was performed. RESULTS: Five women (mean age, 53 years) with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST were identified, four with a schwannoma and one with a neurofibroma, of which all were sporadic and solitary. All patients had good-quality ultrasound images and videoclips and final biopsy of surgically excised tumors, except one patient managed conservatively who had only a core needle biopsy. In all cases, the findings were incidental. The five PNSTs ranged in maximum diameter from 31 to 50 mm. All five PNSTs were solid, moderately vascular tumors, with non-uniform echogenicity, well-circumscribed by hyperechogenic epineurium and with no acoustic shadowing. Most of the masses were round (n = 4 (80%)), and contained small, irregular, anechoic, cystic areas (n = 3 (60%)) and hyperechogenic foci (n = 5 (100%)). In the woman with a schwannoma in whom surgery was not performed, follow-up over a 3-year period showed minimal growth (1.5 mm/year) of the mass. We also summarize the findings of 47 cases of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and neurofibroma identified in a literature search. CONCLUSIONS: On ultrasound examination, no imaging characteristics differentiate reliably between benign schwannomas and neurofibromas. Moreover, benign PNSTs show some similar features to malignant retroperitoneal tumors. They are solid lesions with intralesional blood vessels and show degenerative changes such as cystic areas and hyperechogenic foci. Therefore, ultrasound-guided biopsy may play a pivotal role in their diagnosis. If confirmed to be benign PNSTs, these tumors can be managed conservatively, with ultrasound surveillance. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a retroperitoneální nádory $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D012186
- 650 12
- $a nádory nervové pochvy $x diagnóza $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D018317
- 650 12
- $a neurofibrom $x diagnóza $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D009455
- 650 12
- $a neurilemom $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D009442
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
- 650 12
- $a nádory pánve $7 D010386
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Santos, G $u Institute for Women's Health, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines
- 700 1_
- $a Wong, L $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000318216523
- 700 1_
- $a Yulzari, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- 700 1_
- $a Bennett, R J $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dundr, P $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289406124 $7 xx0080436
- 700 1_
- $a Burgetova, A $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299752338 $7 xx0163957
- 700 1_
- $a Barsa, P $u Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000159653119
- 700 1_
- $a Szabó, G $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary $1 https://orcid.org/0000000285738260
- 700 1_
- $a Sousa, N $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
- 700 1_
- $a Scovazzi, U $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and University of Genoa, Genova, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000209898123
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, D $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163879356 $7 jo20000074072
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 62, č. 5 (2023), s. 727-738
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37058402 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240213093508 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2049516 $s 1210628
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 62 $c 5 $d 727-738 $e - $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
- GRA __
- $a UNCE 204065 and COOPERATIO $p Charles University in Prague
- GRA __
- $a MH CZ-DRO-VFN641165 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- GRA __
- $a NV19-03-00552 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240109