Heterogeneity in the kinetics of nuclear proteins and trajectories of substructures associated with heterochromatin
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
21418567
PubMed Central
PMC3068931
DOI
10.1186/1756-8935-4-5
PII: 1756-8935-4-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Protein exchange kinetics correlate with the level of chromatin condensation and, in many cases, with the level of transcription. We used fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to analyse the kinetics of 18 proteins and determine the relationships between nuclear arrangement, protein molecular weight, global transcription level, and recovery kinetics. In particular, we studied heterochromatin-specific heterochromatin protein 1β (HP1β) B lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 (BMI1), and telomeric-repeat binding factor 1 (TRF1) proteins, and nucleolus-related proteins, upstream binding factor (UBF) and RNA polymerase I large subunit (RPA194). We considered whether the trajectories and kinetics of particular proteins change in response to histone hyperacetylation by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors or after suppression of transcription by actinomycin D. RESULTS: We show that protein dynamics are influenced by many factors and events, including nuclear pattern and transcription activity. A slower recovery after photobleaching was found when proteins, such as HP1β, BMI1, TRF1, and others accumulated at specific foci. In identical cells, proteins that were evenly dispersed throughout the nucleoplasm recovered more rapidly. Distinct trajectories for HP1β, BMI1, and TRF1 were observed after hyperacetylation or suppression of transcription. The relationship between protein trajectory and transcription level was confirmed for telomeric protein TRF1, but not for HP1β or BMI1 proteins. Moreover, heterogeneity of foci movement was especially observed when we made distinctions between centrally and peripherally positioned foci. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we propose that protein kinetics are likely influenced by several factors, including chromatin condensation, differentiation, local protein density, protein binding efficiency, and nuclear pattern. These factors and events likely cooperate to dictate the mobility of particular proteins.
See more in PubMed
Belmont AS. Visualizing chromosome dynamics with GFP. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:250–257. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02000-1. PubMed DOI
Meshorer E. StemBook. The Stem Cell Research Community; 2008. Imaging chromatin in embryonic stem cells.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27072/ PubMed
Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell. 2007;128:787–800. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028. PubMed DOI
Lanctot C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:104–115. doi: 10.1038/nrg2041. PubMed DOI
Mattout A, Meshorer E. Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.02.001. PubMed DOI
Branco MR, Pombo A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040138. PubMed DOI PMC
Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:292–301. doi: 10.1038/35066075. PubMed DOI
Probst AV, Almouzni G. Pericentric heterochromatin: dynamic organization during early development in mammals. Differentiation. 2008;76:15–23. PubMed
Blackburn EH. Telomeres and telomerase: their mechanisms of action and the effects of altering their functions. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:859–862. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.036. PubMed DOI
Blasco MA. Telomere length, stem cells and aging. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:640–649. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.38. PubMed DOI
Prieto JL, McStay B. Pseudo-NORs: a novel model for studying nucleoli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:2116–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.004. PubMed DOI
Raska I, Shaw PJ, Cmarko D. New insights into nucleolar architecture and activity. Int Rev Cytol. 2006;255:177–235. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(06)55004-1. PubMed DOI
Raska I, Shaw PJ, Cmarko D. Structure and function of the nucleolus in the spotlight. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:325–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.008. PubMed DOI
Alcobia I, Quina AS, Neves H, Clode N, Parreira L. The spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin during normal human lymphopoiesis: evidence for ontogenically determined spatial patterns. Exp Cell Res. 2003;290:358–369. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00335-5. PubMed DOI
Boisvert FM, van Koningsbruggen S, Navascues J, Lamond AI. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:574–585. doi: 10.1038/nrm2184. PubMed DOI
McStay B, Grummt I. The epigenetics of rRNA genes: from molecular to chromosome biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:131–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175259. PubMed DOI
Grummt I. Life on a planet of its own: regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription in the nucleolus. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1691–1702. doi: 10.1101/gad.1098503R. PubMed DOI
Russell J, Zomerdijk JC. RNA-polymerase-I-directed rDNA transcription, life and works. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Gorski SA, Snyder SK, John S, Grummt I, Misteli T. Modulation of RNA polymerase assembly dynamics in transcriptional regulation. Mol Cell. 2008;30:486–497. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.021. PubMed DOI PMC
Perry RP, Kelley DE. Inhibition of RNA synthesis by actinomycin D: characteristic dose-response of different RNA species. J Cell Physiol. 1970;76:127–139. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040760202. PubMed DOI
Sobell HM. Actinomycin and DNA transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:5328–5331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.16.5328. PubMed DOI PMC
Weiland Y, Lemmer P, Cremer C. Combining FISH with localisation microscopy: super-resolution imaging of nuclear genome nanostructures. Chromosome Res. 2011;19:5–23. doi: 10.1007/s10577-010-9171-6. PubMed DOI
Egner A, Verrier S, Goroshkov A, Soling HD, Hell SW. 4Pi-microscopy of the Golgi apparatus in live mammalian cells. J Struct Biol. 2004;147:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.006. PubMed DOI
Schermelleh L, Carlton PM, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, Burke B, Cardoso MC, Agard DA, Gustafsson MG, Leonhardt H, Sedat JW. Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science. 2008;320:1332–1336. doi: 10.1126/science.1156947. PubMed DOI PMC
Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt Lett. 1994;19:780–782. doi: 10.1364/OL.19.000780. PubMed DOI
Misteli T. Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science. 2001;291:843–847. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5505.843. PubMed DOI
Hernandez-Munoz I, Lund AH, van der Stoop P, Boutsma E, Muijrers I, Verhoeven E, Nusinow DA, Panning B, Marahrens Y, van Lohuizen M. Stable X chromosome inactivation involves the PRC1 polycomb complex and requires histone MACROH2A1 and the CULLIN3/SPOP ubiquitin E3 ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7635–7640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408918102. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang X, Kam Z, Carlton PM, Xu L, Sedat JW, Blackburn EH. Rapid telomere motions in live human cells analyzed by highly time-resolved microscopy. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2008;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-1-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Festenstein R, Pagakis SN, Hiragami K, Lyon D, Verreault A, Sekkali B, Kioussis D. Modulation of heterochromatin protein 1 dynamics in primary Mammalian cells. Science. 2003;299:719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.1078694. PubMed DOI
Cheutin T, McNairn AJ, Jenuwein T, Gilbert DM, Singh PB, Misteli T. Maintenance of stable heterochromatin domains by dynamic HP1 binding. Science. 2003;299:721–725. doi: 10.1126/science.1078572. PubMed DOI
Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, Scambler PJ, Brown DT, Misteli T. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell. 2006;10:105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.10.017. PubMed DOI PMC
Minc E, Allory Y, Worman HJ, Courvalin JC, Buendia B. Localization and phosphorylation of HP1 proteins during the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Chromosoma. 1999;108:220–234. doi: 10.1007/s004120050372. PubMed DOI
Sparmann A, van Lohuizen M. Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:846–856. doi: 10.1038/nrc1991. PubMed DOI
Sykorova E, Fajkus J. Structure-function relationships in telomerase genes. Biol Cell. 2009;101:375–392. doi: 10.1042/BC20080205. PubMed DOI
Horakova AH, Bartova E, Galiova G, Uhlirova R, Matula P, Kozubek S. SUV39h-independent association of HP1 beta with fibrillarin-positive nucleolar regions. Chromosoma. 2010;119:227–241. doi: 10.1007/s00412-009-0252-2. PubMed DOI
Jacobson K, Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. PubMed DOI PMC
Braga J, Desterro JM, Carmo-Fonseca M. Intracellular macromolecular mobility measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with confocal laser scanning microscopes. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:4749–4760. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-06-0496. PubMed DOI PMC
Houtsmuller AB, Rademakers S, Nigg AL, Hoogstraten D, Hoeijmakers JH, Vermeulen W. Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells. Science. 1999;284:958–961. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.958. PubMed DOI
Kruhlak MJ, Lever MA, Fischle W, Verdin E, Bazett-Jones DP, Hendzel MJ. Reduced mobility of the alternate splicing factor (ASF) through the nucleoplasm and steady state speckle compartments. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:41–51. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.1.41. PubMed DOI PMC
Phair RD, Misteli T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature. 2000;404:604–609. doi: 10.1038/35007077. PubMed DOI
Bartova E, Pachernik J, Harnicarova A, Kovarik A, Kovarikova M, Hofmanova J, Skalnikova M, Kozubek M, Kozubek S. Nuclear levels and patterns of histone H3 modification and HP1 proteins after inhibition of histone deacetylases. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:5035–5046. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02621. PubMed DOI
Taddei A, Maison C, Roche D, Almouzni G. Reversible disruption of pericentric heterochromatin and centromere function by inhibiting deacetylases. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:114–120. doi: 10.1038/35055010. PubMed DOI
Ayoub N, Jeyasekharan AD, Bernal JA, Venkitaraman AR. HP1-beta mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature. 2008;453:682–686. doi: 10.1038/nature06875. PubMed DOI
Ayoub N, Jeyasekharan AD, Venkitaraman AR. Mobilization and recruitment of HP1: a bimodal response to DNA breakage. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2945–2950. PubMed
Melcer S, Meshorer E. Chromatin plasticity in pluripotent cells. Essays Biochem. 2010;48:245–262. doi: 10.1042/bse0480245. PubMed DOI
Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. Locus-specific and activity-independent gene repositioning during early tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:39–50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200708204. PubMed DOI PMC
Bartova E, Krejci J, Harnicarova A, Kozubek S. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells induces condensation of chromosome territories and formation of heterochromatin protein 1 foci. Differentiation. 2008;76:24–32. PubMed
Kupper K, Kolbl A, Biener D, Dittrich S, von Hase J, Thormeyer T, Fiegler H, Carter NP, Speicher MR, Cremer T, Cremer M. Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression. Chromosoma. 2007;116:285–306. doi: 10.1007/s00412-007-0098-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Muratani M, Gerlich D, Janicki SM, Gebhard M, Eils R, Spector DL. Metabolic-energy-dependent movement of PML bodies within the mammalian cell nucleus. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:106–110. doi: 10.1038/ncb740. PubMed DOI
Guan Y, Xu M, Liang Z, Xu N, Lu Z, Han Q, Zhang Y, Zhao XS. Heterogeneous transportation of alpha1B-adrenoceptor in living cells. Biophys Chem. 2007;127:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2007.01.009. PubMed DOI
Odenheimer J, Heermann DW, Kreth G. Brownian dynamics simulations reveal regulatory properties of higher-order chromatin structures. Eur Biophys J. 2009;38:749–756. doi: 10.1007/s00249-009-0486-1. PubMed DOI
Bartova E, Pachernik J, Kozubik A, Kozubek S. Differentiation-specific association of HP1alpha and HP1beta with chromocentres is correlated with clustering of TIF1beta at these sites. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007;127:375–388. doi: 10.1007/s00418-006-0259-1. PubMed DOI
Nguyen VT, Giannoni F, Dubois MF, Seo SJ, Vigneron M, Kedinger C, Bensaude O. In vivo degradation of RNA polymerase II largest subunit triggered by alpha-amanitin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:2924–2929. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.15.2924. PubMed DOI PMC
Matula P, Kozubek M, Dvorak V. Fast point-based 3-D alignment of live cells. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006;15:2388–2396. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2006.875209. PubMed DOI
Uhlírová R, Horáková AH, Galiová G, Legartová S, Matula P, Fojtová M, Varecha M, Amrichová J, Vondrácek J, Kozubek S, Bártová E. SUV39h- and A-type lamin-dependent telomere nuclear rearrangement. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109:915–926. PubMed
Zack GW, Rogers WE, Latt SA. Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency. J Histochem Cytochem. 1977;25:741–753. PubMed
Michalet X. Mean square displacement analysis of single-particle trajectories with localization error: Brownian motion in an isotropic medium. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011;82:041914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.041914. PubMed DOI PMC
HP1β-dependent recruitment of UBF1 to irradiated chromatin occurs simultaneously with CPDs
Recruitment of Oct4 protein to UV-damaged chromatin in embryonic stem cells