• This record comes from PubMed

Evaluation of potential biomarkers for the discrimination of bacterial and viral infections

. 2011 Oct ; 39 (5) : 411-7. [epub] 20110701

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

PURPOSE: Timely knowledge of the bacterial etiology and localization of infection are important for empirical antibiotic therapy. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate routinely used biomarkers together with novel laboratory parameters in the diagnosis of infection. METHODS: In this prospective study, 54 adult patients with bacterial infections admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases were included. For comparison, 27 patients with viral infections were enrolled. In these patients, white blood cell (WBC) counts, differential blood counts, serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, soluble CD14 (sCD14), heparin-binding protein (HBP), cortisol (Cort), and monocyte surface expression of TLR2, TLR4, HLA-DR, and CD14 were analyzed. Also, these biomarkers were evaluated in 21 patients with acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), as well as in 21 patients with pyelonephritis and urosepsis. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity and specificity (expressed as the area under the curve [AUC]) for bacterial infection were observed in serum concentration of PCT (0.952), neutrophil and lymphocyte counts (0.852 and 0.841, respectively), and serum levels of HBP (0.837), IL-6 (0.830), and Cort (0.817). In addition, the serum levels of IFN-γ and Cort were significantly higher and IL-8 levels were lower in CABP when compared to pyelonephritis or urosepsis. CONCLUSIONS: From the novel potential biomarkers, only PCT demonstrated superiority over the routine parameters in the differentiation of bacterial from viral infections. However, some of the novel parameters should be further evaluated in larger and better characterized cohorts of patients in order to find their clinical applications.

Comment In

PubMed

See more in PubMed

Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 1;49(7):1044-50 PubMed

Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5 Suppl):S202-8 PubMed

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007 Dec;40(6):513-7 PubMed

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Jun;21(6):584-8; discussion 613-4 PubMed

Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R41 PubMed

Blood. 1996 Jun 15;87(12):5144-51 PubMed

Scand J Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;42(8):634-6 PubMed

Biomark Insights. 2009 Aug 05;4:111-21 PubMed

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Mar;37(2):234-41 PubMed

Thorax. 1995 Dec;50(12):1253-7 PubMed

Blood. 2002 Mar 1;99(5):1785-93 PubMed

Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R83 PubMed

An Pediatr (Barc). 2007 Jun;66(6):566-72 PubMed

J Chin Med Assoc. 2003 Sep;66(9):523-7 PubMed

Lancet. 1993 Feb 27;341(8844):515-8 PubMed

Infection. 2011 Feb;39(1):41-5 PubMed

Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(9):663-71 PubMed

N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1699-713 PubMed

Cell Immunol. 2001 Jan 10;207(1):13-8 PubMed

Shock. 2004 Nov;22(5):403-9 PubMed

Am J Surg. 1993 Feb;165(2A Suppl):75S-81S PubMed

Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2746-52 PubMed

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Nov;30 Suppl 1:S16-23 PubMed

Mymensingh Med J. 2008 Jul;17(2 Suppl):S72-6 PubMed

Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55 PubMed

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Aug;25(8):501-9 PubMed

J Leukoc Biol. 2009 Mar;85(3):382-90 PubMed

J Immunol. 2004 Feb 15;172(4):2407-15 PubMed

Immunol Invest. 2008;37(8):752-69 PubMed

Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Aug;17(4):371-5 PubMed

Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(6-7):596-603 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...