Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection: higher incidence of infectious complications?
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hepatectomy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Catheter Ablation adverse effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Liver Neoplasms secondary surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic epidemiology MeSH
AIM: To evaluate clinical experience with radiofrequency (RF)-assisted liver resection in non-cirrhotic and non-cholestatic patients with metastatic liver disease. METHODS: A group of consecutive patients who underwent RF-assisted liver resection for metastatic liver disease was prospectively followed. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and April 2008, 95 liver RF-assisted liver resections were performed, 71 of them for metastatic liver disease. The mean hospital stay was 14 (range 5-40) days. The mean operation time was 141 (range 64-233) minutes. The mean duration of RF coagulation was 10 (range 9-12) minutes. A total of 37 complications in 24 (33%) patients were recorded, including 12 (16.9%) infected collections in resection line that had to be drained percutaneously. The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that RF-assisted resection may have a benefit in decreasing peroperative blood loss and the number of blood transfusions. Nevertheless, an increased incidence of infectious complications and pleural effusions that required evacuation was noted.
References provided by Crossref.org
