The effects of large herbivores on the landscape dynamics of a perennial herb

. 2012 Nov ; 110 (7) : 1411-21. [epub] 20120403

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22492260

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Models assessing the prospects of plant species at the landscape level often focus primarily on the relationship between species dynamics and landscape structure. However, the short-term prospects of species with slow responses to landscape changes depend on the factors affecting local population dynamics. In this study it is hypothesized that large herbivores may be a major factor affecting the short-term prospects of slow-responding species in the European landscape, because large herbivores have increased in number in this region in recent decades and can strongly influence local population dynamics. METHODS: The impact of browsing by large herbivores was simulated on the landscape-level dynamics of the dry grassland perennial polycarpic herb Scorzonera hispanica. A dynamic, spatially explicit model was used that incorporated information on the location of patches suitable for S. hispanica, local population dynamics (matrices including the impact of large herbivores), initial population sizes and dispersal rate of the species. Simulations were performed relating to the prospects of S. hispanica over the next 30 years under different rates of herbivory (browsing intensity) and varying frequencies of population destruction (e.g. by human activity). KEY RESULTS: Although a high rate of herbivory was detected in most populations of S. hispanica, current landscape-level dynamics of S. hispanica were approximately in equilibrium. A decline or increase of over 20 % in the herbivory rate promoted rapid expansion or decline of S. hispanica, respectively. This effect was much stronger in the presence of population destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Browsing by large herbivores can have a dramatic effect on the landscape dynamics of plant species. Changes in the density of large herbivores and the probability of population destruction should be incorporated into models predicting species abundance and distribution.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Escós J, Andujar A. Effects of the spatial pattern of disturbance on the patch-occupancy dynamics of juniper-pine open woodland. Ecological Modelling. 2009;220:1544–1550.

Augspurger CK. Morphology and dispersal potential of wind-dispersed diasporas of neotropical trees. American Journal of Botany. 1986;73:353–363.

Augustine DJ, Frelich LE. Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests. Conservation Biology. 1998;12:995–1004.

Aulak W, Babinska-Werka J. Use of agricultural habitats by roe deer inhabiting a small forest area. Acta Theriologica. 1990;35:121–127.

Bastin L, Thomas CD. The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landscape Ecology. 1999;14:493–507.

Beals EW. Bray–Curtis Ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research. 1984;14:1–55.

Bergelson J, Crawley MJ. The effects of grazers on the performance of individuals and populations of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia. 1992;90:435–444. PubMed

Brunet J, von Oheimb G, Diekmann M. Factors influencing vegetation gradients across ancient–recent woodland borderlines in southern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2000;11:515–524.

Bullock JM, Clarke RT. Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve. Oecologia. 2000;124:506–521. PubMed

Chater AO. Scorzonera. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1976. pp. 320–321.

Chýlová T, Münzbergová Z. Past land use co-determines the present distribution of dry grassland plant species. Preslia. 2008;80:183–198.

Collinge SK. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1996;36:59–77.

Coulon A, Morellet N, Goulard M, Cargnelutti B, Angibault JM, Hewison AJM. Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function. Landscape Ecology. 2008;23:603–614.

Crawley MJ. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. 1st edn. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.

Dupré C, Ehrlén J. Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. Journal of Ecology. 2002;90:796–805.

Ehrlén J, Münzbergová Z. Timing of flowering: opposed selection on different fitness components and trait covariation. The American Naturalist. 2009;173:819–830. PubMed

Ehrlén J, Münzbergová Z, Diekmann M, Eriksson O. Long-term assessment of seed limitation in plants: results from an 11-year experiment. Journal of Ecology. 2006;94:1224–1232.

Ellenberg H. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.

Eriksson O. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos. 1996;77:248–258.

Fischer SF, Poschlod P, Beinlich B. Experimental studies on the dispersal of plants and animals on sheep in calcareous grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology. 1996;33:1206–1222.

Freckleton RP, Watkinson AR. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. Journal of Ecology. 2002;90:419–434.

Gill RMA, Johnson AL, Francis A, Hiscocks K, Peace AJ. Changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) population density in response to forest habitat succession. Forest Ecology and Management. 1996;88:31–41.

Gomez JM. Long-term effects of ungulates on performance, abundance, and spatial distribution of two montane herbs. Ecological Monographs. 2005;75:231–258.

Hanski I. Metapopulation ecology. 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.

Hanski I, Ovaskainen O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature. 2000;404:755–758. PubMed

Harrison S. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1991;42:73–88.

Herben T, Münzbergová Z, Mildén M, Ehrlén J, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O. Long-term spatial dynamics of Succisa pratensis in a changing rural landscape: linking dynamical modelling with historical maps. Journal of Ecology. 2006;94:131–143.

Hewison AJM, Vincent JP, Joachim J, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Cibien C. The effects of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2001;79:679–689.

Hewison AJM, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, et al. Using radio-tracking and direct observation to estimate roe deer Capreolus capreolus density in a fragmented landscape: a pilot study. Wildlife Biology. 2007;13:313–320.

Husband BC, Barrett SCH. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. Journal of Ecology. 1996;84:461–469.

Jepsen JU, Topping CJ. Modelling roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a gradient of forest fragmentation: behavioural plasticity and choice of cover. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2004;82:1528–1541.

Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC, Boroski BB, Loft ER. Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology. 2002;83:530–544.

Knight TM, Barfield M, Holt RD. Evolutionary dynamics as a component of stage-structured matrix models: an example using Trillium grandiflorum. The American Naturalist. 2008;172:375–392. PubMed

Lamberti P, Mauri L, Merli E, Dusi S, Apollonio M. Use of space and habitat selection by roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a Mediterranean coastal area: how does woods landscape affect home range? Journal of Ethology. 2006;24:181–188.

Lin SM, Galloway LF. Environmental context determines within- and potential between-generation consequences of herbivory. Oecologia. 2009;163:911–920. PubMed

Lindborg R, Eriksson O. Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology. 2004;85:1840–1845.

Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005;28:385–393.

Maron JL, Crone E. Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2006;273:2575–2584. PubMed PMC

Matlack GR. Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology. 1994;75:1491–1502.

Meriggi A, Sotti F, Lamberti P, Gilio N. A review of the methods for monitoring roe deer European populations with particular reference to Italy. Hystrix. 2008;19:23–40.

Mildén M, Münzbergová Z, Herben T, Ehrlén J. Metapopulation dynamics of a perennial plant, Succisa pratensis, in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Modelling. 2006;199:464–475.

Miyashita T, Suzuki M, Ando D, Fujita G, Ochiai K, Asada M. Forest edge creates small-scale variation in reproductive rate of sika deer. Population Ecology. 2008;50:111–120.

Münzbergová Z. Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. Journal of Ecology. 2004;92:854–867.

Münzbergová Z. Effect of population size on the prospect of species survival. Folia Geobotanica. 2006;41:137–150.

Münzbergová Z, Herben T. Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats in metapopulation studies using co-occurrence of species. Oikos. 2004;105:408–414.

Münzbergová Z, Plačková I. Seed mass and population characteristics interact to determine performance of Scorzonera hispanica under common garden conditions. Flora. 2010;205:552–559.

Münzbergová Z, Mildén M, Ehrlén J, Herben T. Population viability and reintroduction strategies: a spatially explicit landscape-level approach. Ecological Applications. 2005;15:1377–1386.

Münzbergová Z, Hadincová V, Wild J, Herben T, Marešová J. Spatial and temporal variation in dispersal pattern of an invasive pine. Biological Invasions. 2010;12:2471–2486.

Nathan R, Katul GG, Horn HS, et al. Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature. 2002;418:409–413. PubMed

Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A. Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2008;23:638–647. PubMed

Nilsen EB, Linnell JDC, Andersen R. Individual access to preferred habitat affects fitness components in female roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2004;73:44–50.

Paige KN, Whitham TG. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory – the advantage of being eaten. The American Naturalist. 1987;129:407–416.

Rooney TP, Waller DM. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003;181:165–176.

Russell FL, Zippin DB, Fowler NL. Effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. American Midland Naturalist. 2001;146:1–26.

Saïd S, Gaillard JM, Duncan P, et al. Ecological correlates of home-range size in spring–summer for female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a deciduous woodland. Journal of Zoology. 2005;267:301–308.

Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology. 1991;5:18–32.

Soons MB, Heil GW. Reduced colonization capacity in fragmented populations of wind-dispersed grass land forbs. Journal of Ecology. 2002;90:1033–1043.

Tájek P, Bucharová A, Münzbergová Z. Limitation of distribution of two rare ferns in fragmented landscape. Acta Oecologica. 2011;37:495–502.

Tremlová K, Münzbergová Z. Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology. 2007;88:965–977. PubMed

Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnell J. Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1996;65:715–724.

Welch D, Staines BW, Catt DC, Scott D. Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Zoology. 1990;221:453–476.

With KA, Gardner RH, Turner MG. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos. 1997;78:151–169.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace