The family of orchids involves a number of critically endangered species. Understanding of drivers of their landscape distribution could provide a valuable insight into their decline. Our objectives were to develop models predicting distribution of selected orchid species-four co-occurring forest orchid species, Cephalanthera rubra, Epipactis atrorubens, E. helleborine, and Neottia nidus-avis-at a landscape scale using a wide range of habitat characteristics. Subsequently, we compared the model predictions with species occurrence and the results of the field germination experiment while considering two germination stages-asymbiotic (early stage) and symbiotic. And finally, we attempted to identify possible drivers of species' landscape distribution (i.e., dispersal, availability of habitat patches, or fungal associates). We have discovered that different habitat characteristics determined the distribution of different orchids. The species also differed in terms of availability of suitable habitat patches and patch occupancy (the highest being E. atrorubens with 80%). Landscape distribution of the species was primarily restricted by the availability of fungal associates (the most important factor for C. rubra) and by the availability of suitable habitat patches (the most important in case of N. nidus-avis). Despite expected easy dispersal of spores, orchid distribution seems to be limited by the availability of fungal associates in the landscape. In contrast, the availability of orchid seeds does not seem to limit their distribution. These results can provide useful guidelines for conservation of the studied species.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University 128 01 Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia 370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences 252 43 Průhonice Czech Republic

Městský úřad Strakonice Odbor životního prostředí Velké náměstí 2 386 01 Strakonice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2002 Sep;11(9):1831-44 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1799-806 PubMed

Oecologia. 2005 Aug;145(1):1-8 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):797-804 PubMed

New Phytol. 2007;176(2):237-41 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2008 Aug;17(16):3707-16 PubMed

Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Feb;14(2):64-70 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2012 Mar;21(6):1511-23 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(7):1411-21 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2012 Sep;21(17):4160-70 PubMed

Am J Bot. 2012 Jun;99(6):1020-32 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 05;8(6):e65879 PubMed

Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1256688 PubMed

AoB Plants. 2015 Apr 21;7:null PubMed

New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(1):255-64 PubMed

Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285-93 PubMed

Historical biogeography and local adaptation explain population genetic structure in a widespread terrestrial orchid

Epiphytic Orchid Diversity along an Altitudinal Gradient in Central Nepal