Support for population level tobacco control policies in Hungary
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Grantová podpora
R01 TW007927
FIC NIH HHS - United States
1 R01 TW007927-01
FIC NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
22571024
PubMed Central
PMC3821970
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a3716
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kouření zákonodárství a právo psychologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- postoj * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sexuální faktory MeSH
- stupeň vzdělání MeSH
- tabákový průmysl zákonodárství a právo MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe MeSH
- zdravotní politika * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Maďarsko MeSH
BACKGROUND: Smoking is the leading, preventable risk factor for premature death and disability in Hungary. The objective of this paper was to assess the social acceptability of and the predictors of holding favourable attitudes toward tobacco control policies among the Hungarian population. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire-based study was carried out among individuals aged 16-70 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether support for the ten tobacco control policies varies as a function of age, sex, educational level, and smoking status. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents supported the studied tobacco control measures. Over 90 percent of the sample supported: fines for retailers selling tobacco products to minors (92.3%), stricter enforcement of restrictions on selling tobacco products to minors (90.5%), and a ban on smoking in health care institutions (91.4%). The lowest levels of support were for bans on sponsorship by the tobacco industry (52.8%) and price increases on tobacco products (54.9%). For each measure, support was significantly lower among smokers than non-smokers. Age and education were significantly related to support for some but not all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Strong majorities of Hungarians support the enactment and enforcement of a wide range of tobacco control measures, a fact that was acknowledged by Parliament's passage of the 2011 Anti-Smoking Law. Advocacy efforts to encourage the acceptance of tobacco control policies should focus not only on smokers, but also on younger and less educated non-smokers.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
The Gallup Organization. Survey on tobacco: analytical report [Internet] 2009 Mar; [cited 2009 Apr 13]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_253_en.pdf.
O’Kelly S. EuroHeart 2009 [Internet] 2009 Sep; [cited 2010 Aug 22]. Available from: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-09/esoc-e2090809.php.
Thomas S, Fayter D, Misso K, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Sowden A, et al. Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. Tob Control. 2008 Aug;17(4):230–7. PubMed PMC
Cokkinides V, Bandi P, McMahon C, Jemal A, Glynn T, Ward E. Tobacco control in the United States - recent progress and opportunities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):352–65. PubMed
Act XCIII of 1993 on workers protection [Internet] [cited 2010 Oct 6]. Available from: http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=99300093.TV/. (In Hungarian.)
Act LXXVII of 2005 on advertising an amendment of Act LVIII of 1997 [Internet] [cited 2011 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.complex.hu/kzldat/t0500077.htm/t0500077.htm. (In Hungarian.)
Szilágyi T. Hungary introduces a total ban on tobacco advertising. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):79–81. PubMed PMC
Act XLVIII of 2008 on advertising [Internet] [cited 2011 Jul 13]. Available from: http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0800048.TV. (In Hungarian.)
Act XLII of 1999 on the protection of non-smokers and the regulation of tobacco sales, marketing and use [Internet] [cited 2010 Oct 6]. Available from: http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=99900042.TV/. (In Hungarian.)
Lomnici Z, Fejér E, Gazsó BL, Rónyai N. Operative legislative provisions of organizations and the Hungarian tobacco control program. Hungarian policy and investigation. Egészségtudomány [Internet] 2011;55(2):99. [cited 2011 Jul 11] Available from: http://egeszsegtudomany.higienikus.hu/cikk/2011-2/2011-2.pdf. (In Hungarian.)
World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control [Internet] Geneva: WHO; 2003. updated reprint 2004, 2005 [cited 2010 Oct 10]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241591013.pdf.
Act XLI of 2011 an amendment of Act XLII of 1999 on the protection of non-smokers and the regulation of tobacco sales, marketing and use [Internet] [cited 2011 May 5]. Available from: http://www.kozlonyok.hu/nkonline/MKPDF/hiteles/MK11048.pdf. (In Hungarian.)
Szilágyi T. Increasing taxes of tobacco products and decreasing smoking: experiences and suggestions. Study for the Hungarian Coalition on Tobacco Control [Internet] 2006 [cited 2011 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.health21.hungary.globalink.org/koal_menu_elemei/dohanyado_vegso.doc. (In Hungarian.)
Act CXXVII of 2003 on excise tax and distribution of excise products [Internet] [cited 2011 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.complex.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0300127.TV×hift=0. (In Hungarian.)
World Health Organization. Guidelines for controlling and monitoring the tobacco epidemic [Internet] Geneva: WHO; 1998. Monitoring tobacco use. [cited 2009 Jan 2]. Available from: http://health21.hungary.globalink.org/koal_menu_elemei/WHO.DOC. (In Hungarian.)
Starr G, Rogers T, Schooley M, Porter S, Wiesen E, Jamison N. Key outcome indicators for evaluating comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.
California Adult Tobacco Survey (CATS) Instrument. California adult tobacco survey: 2007 questionnaire [Internet] Sacramento (CA): CATS; 2007. [cited 2009 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/tobacco/Documents/CTCP-CATSQuestionnaire2007.pdf.
Marques-Vidal P, Melich-Cerveira J, Paccaud F, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Cornuz J. Opinions on tobacco control policies in Lausanne, Switzerland, 2003–2006. Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):193–4. PubMed
Schumann A, John U, Thyrian JR, Ulbricht S, Hapke U, Meyer C. Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behaviour. Eur J Public Health. 2006 Oct;16(5):513–9. PubMed
Abdullah AS, Yang T, Beard J. Predictors of women’s attitudes toward world health organization framework convention on tobacco control policies in urban China. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010 May;19(5):903–9. PubMed
Foley KL, Balázs P. Social will for tobacco control among the Hungarian public health workforce. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2010 Mar;18(1):25–30. PubMed PMC
Thyrian JR, Panagiotakos DB, Polychronopulos E, Willemsen MC, Zatoñski W, John U. The exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and attitudes towards tobacco control measures - a comparison of 5 European countries. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2010 Jun;18(2):87–92. PubMed