BACKGROUND: The Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) is the esophageal pressure topography (EPT) metric used for assessing the adequacy of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation in the Chicago Classification of motility disorders. However, because the IRP value is also influenced by distal esophageal contractility, we hypothesized that its normal limits should vary with different patterns of contractility. METHODS: Five hundred and twenty two selected EPT studies were used to compare the accuracy of alternative analysis paradigms to that of a motility expert (the 'gold standard'). Chicago Classification metrics were scored manually and used as inputs for MATLAB™ programs that utilized either strict algorithm-based interpretation (fixed abnormal IRP threshold of 15 mmHg) or a classification and regression tree (CART) model that selected variable IRP thresholds depending on the associated esophageal contractility. KEY RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CART model for achalasia (93%) was better than that of the algorithm-based approach (85%) on account of using variable IRP thresholds that ranged from a low value of >10 mmHg to distinguish type I achalasia from absent peristalsis to a high value of >17 mmHg to distinguish type III achalasia from distal esophageal spasm. Additionally, type II achalasia was diagnosed solely by panesophageal pressurization without the IRP entering the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Automated interpretation of EPT studies more closely mimics that of a motility expert when IRP thresholds for impaired EGJ relaxation are adjusted depending on the pattern of associated esophageal contractility. The range of IRP cutoffs suggested by the CART model ranged from 10 to 17 mmHg.

Department of Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL 60611 2951 USA

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying OGJ morphoogy and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G1033–40. PubMed

Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. Impaired deglutitive OGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal relaxation: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G878–85. PubMed

JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:796–806. PubMed PMC

Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJPM. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(S1):57–65. PubMed PMC

Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Racowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(3):172–81. PubMed

Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. 2. Pacific Grove, CA: Wads-wirth; 1984.

Hou Q, Lin Z, Dusing R, McCallum RW. Optimizing the diagnostic power with gastric emptying scintigraphy at multiple time points. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011;11:84. PubMed PMC

Steinberg D, Colla P. CART: Tree-structured non-parametric data analysis. San Diego, CA: Salford Systems; 1995.

Scherer JR, Kwiatek MA, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Functional esophagogastric junction obstruction with intact peristalsis: A heterogeneous syndrome sometimes akin to achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2219–25. PubMed PMC

Carlson D, Bidari K, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Interpreting esophageal pressure topography (EPT) utilizing a scheme based on individual swallow pattern categorization and formula driven dianosis. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(5 Suppl 1):S-300.