Defect-diaphragmatic ratio: a new parameter for assessment of defect size in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- bránice chirurgie MeSH
- brániční hernie diagnóza mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- chirurgické síťky * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití trendy MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- vrozená brániční kýla * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zákroky plastické chirurgie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
AIM: The aim of our study is to introduce a new objective method of perioperative evaluation of the size of diaphragmatic defect to enable comparison of results among various centres and methods used for diaphragmatic reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and respiratory distress within 24 h of birth operated on from January 2009 to December 2011. Weight, length, thoracic shape and the diameters of diaphragmatic defect were measured. To determine the relative size of the defect, a defect-diaphragmatic ratio (DDR = defect area:diaphragm area × 100) was calculated. The measured and calculated data were subsequently compared between Gore-Tex patch group (GT) and primary repair group (PR). Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with CDH were admitted during study period. The overall survival rate was 79 % (37/47). Preoperative stabilization was achieved in 85 % (40/47). Survival of operated neonates was 93 % (37/40). Diaphragmatic reconstruction with Gore-Tex patch was used in 7 neonates (17 %), and primary repair in 33 (83 %). Mortality in Gore-Tex group was 29 %; mortality in primary repair group was 3 %. Data of anthropometric measurement were complete in 34 children (5 GT and 29 PR). Significant differences were found between GT group and PR group in the size of diaphragmatic defect with the transverse and sagittal diameters of defect (48.0 ± 5.7 vs. 30.1 ± 5.9, P < 0.00061; 34.0 ± 12.5 vs. 16.0 ± 7.3, P < 0.0022) and DDR (18.29 ± 4.60 vs. 5.77 ± 3.28, P < 0.0005), respectively. CONCLUSION: The value of DDR as an objective criterion of the extent of diaphragmatic defect was confirmed by the close correlation between DDR and feasibility of primary repair in the study group. This objective assessment of defect size may improve comparing various surgical techniques and results of different centres, and thus facilitates sharing experience with management of neonates with CDH.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Apr;22(4):335-40 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jan;41(1):29-33; discussion 29-33 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jan;47(1):81-6 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2005 Jan;21(1):64-7 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Dec;15(6):399-403 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Dec;8(6):329-33 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):151-4 PubMed
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jun;6(3):136-8 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar;38(3):296-300; discussion 296-300 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):155-60; discussion 160 PubMed
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;17(2):90-7 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jan;36(1):152-4 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Sep;25(9):733-43 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 1997 Mar 21;12(2/3):95-100 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Nov;40(11):1701-5 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Jan;23(1):27-31 PubMed
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e651-7 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jul;33(7):1004-9 PubMed
Semin Perinatol. 2004 Jun;28(3):174-84 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Sep;27(9):969-74 PubMed
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Dec;25(12):1059-64 PubMed
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 May;41(5):888-92 PubMed
Curr Probl Surg. 1994 Oct;31(10):787-846 PubMed
