The ability of rumen ciliates, Eudiplodinium maggii, Diploplastron affine, and Entodinium caudatum, to use the murein saccharides
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23446488
PubMed Central
PMC3910104
DOI
10.1007/s12223-013-0231-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Rumen parasitology MeSH
- Bacteria chemistry MeSH
- Ciliophora metabolism MeSH
- Culture Media chemistry MeSH
- Fatty Acids, Volatile metabolism MeSH
- Peptidoglycan isolation & purification metabolism MeSH
- Polysaccharides metabolism MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Culture Media MeSH
- Fatty Acids, Volatile MeSH
- Peptidoglycan MeSH
- Polysaccharides MeSH
Murein polysaccharides may contribute to a considerable part of the dry matter of bacterial cells. Their utilization by protozoa inhabiting the rumen is, however, poorly recognized. The objective of this study was to examine the ability of three species of ciliates, i.e., Eudiplodinium maggii, Diploplastron affine, and Entodinium caudatum of digest, and ferment these saccharides. The cultivation experiments showed that the enrichment of growth medium with bacterial cell wall β-glycans increased the ciliate number (p < 0.05). A statistically significant increase (p < 0.01) was followed by a continuous decrease (p < 0.01) in the percentage of individuals containing β-glycans particles after 4- and 24-h incubation of ciliates with this substrate, respectively. The enzymatic experiments confirmed the ability of the examined protozoa to digest murein. E. caudatum exhibited the highest activity (8.2 unit (U)/mg protein per min), and E. maggii, the lowest (3.0 U/mg protein per min). The production rates of volatile fatty acids by starved and fed ciliate species were 0.7 and 1.6 (E. caudatum) pmol/ciliate cell per h, 30.5 and 42.5 (E. maggii) pmol/ciliate cell per h, and 8.3 and 19.2 (D. affine) pmol/ciliate cell per h (p < 0.05).
See more in PubMed
Abou Akkada AR, Howard BH. The biochemistry of rumen protozoa. 3. The carbohydrate metabolism of Entodinium. Biochem J. 1960;76:445–451. PubMed PMC
Belzecki G, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR, McIntosh FM, Michalowski T. Characterization of the amylolytic properties of the rumen ciliate protozoan Eudiplodinium maggii. J Anim Feed Sci. 2007;16:590–606.
Belzecki G, Miltko R, Kwiatkowska E, Michalowski T. Mureinolytic ability of the rumen ciliate Diploplastron affine. Folia Microbiol. 2010;55:312–314. doi: 10.1007/s12223-010-0047-0. PubMed DOI
Bonhomme A. Rumen ciliates: their metabolism and relationships with bacteria and their hosts. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1990;30:203–266. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(90)90016-2. DOI
Coleman GS. The cellulase contents of 15 species of entodiniomorphid protozoa, mixed bacteria and plant derbies isolated from the ovine rumen. J Agric Sci. 1985;104:349–360. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600044038. DOI
Coleman GS. Protozoal–bacterial interaction in the rumen. In: Nolan JV, Leng RA, Demeyer DI, editors. The roles of protozoa and fungi in ruminant digestion. 1. Armidale: Penambul Books; 1988. pp. 13–26.
Coleman GS, Davies JI, Cash MA. The cultivation of rumen ciliates Epidinium ecaudatum caudatum and Polyplastron multivesiculatum in vitro. J Gen Microbiol. 1972;73:509–521. doi: 10.1099/00221287-73-3-509. PubMed DOI
Czerkawski JW. An introduction to rumen studies. New York: Pergamon; 1986.
Dogiel VA. Monographie der Familie Ophryoscolecidae. Arch Protistenk. 1927;59:1–288.
Glauner B. Separation and quantification of muropeptides with high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1988;172:451–64. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90468-X. PubMed DOI
Hungate RE. The culture of Eudiplodinium neglectum, with experiments on the digestion of cellulose. Biol Bull. 1942;83:303–319. doi: 10.2307/1538229. DOI
Jouany JP, Ushida K. Protozoa and fiber digestion in the rumen. In: Hoshimo S, Onodera R, Minato H, Itabashi H, editors. The rumen ecosystem: the microbial metabolism and its regulation. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press; 1990. pp. 139–151.
Ling JR. Digestion of bacterial cell walls in the rumen. In: Hoshino S, Onodera R, Minato H, Itabashi H, editors. The rumen ecosystem: the microbial metabolism and its regulation. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press; 1990. pp. 83–90.
Litzinger S, Mayer C. The murein sacculus. In: König H, Claus H, Varma A, editors. Prokaryotic cell wall compounds: structure and biochemistry. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 3–52.
Michalowski T. The synthesis and turnover of the cellular mater of ciliates in the rumen. Acta Protozool. 1990;29:47–72.
Michalowski T. Digestion and fermentation of the microcrystalline cellulose by the rumen ciliate protozoon Eudiplodinium maggii. Acta Protozool. 1997;36:181–185.
Michalowski T, Szczepkowski P, Muszynski P. The nutritive factors affecting the growth of the rumen ciliate Diploplastron affine in vitro. Acta Protozool. 1986;25:419–426.
Michalowski T, Muszynski P, Landa L. Factor influencing the growth on rumen ciliates Eudiplodinium maggii in vitro. Acta Protozool. 1991;30:115–120.
Michalowski T, Harmeyer J, Belzecki G. The importance of washing the omasum for successful defaunation of sheep. J Anim Feed Sci. 1999;8:611–619.
Morgavi DP, Sakurada M, Tomita Y, Onodera R. Electrophoretic forms of chitinolytic and lysozyme activities in ruminal protozoa. Curr Microbiol. 1996;32:115–118. doi: 10.1007/s002849900020. PubMed DOI
Pace J. Seed proteins. In: Peach K, Tracey MV, editors. Modern methods of plant analysis. Berlin: Springer; 1955. pp. 69–105.
Parker RE. Introductory statistics for biology. Southampton: The Camelot Press Ltd; 1979.
Sherr EB, Sherr BF. Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs. Anton Leeuw Int J G. 2002;81:293–308. doi: 10.1023/A:1020591307260. PubMed DOI
Stewart CS, Flint HJ, Bryant MP. The rumen bacteria. In: Hobson PJ, Stewart CS, editors. The rumen microbial ecosystem. 2. Madras: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1997. pp. 10–72.
Vaqué D, Gasol JM, Marrasé C. Grazing rates on bacteria: the significance of methodology and ecological factors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1994;109:263–274. doi: 10.3354/meps109263. DOI
Williams AG, Coleman GS. The rumen protozoa. Berlin: Springer; 1992.
Ziolecki A, Kwiatkowska E. Gas chromatography of C1 to C5 fatty acids in rumen fluid and fermentation media. J Chromatogr. 1973;80:250–254. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)85338-3. PubMed DOI