Hybrid Technique of Lamellar Keratoplasty (DMEK-S)
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
23840937
PubMed Central
PMC3687501
DOI
10.1155/2013/254383
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of the hybrid technique of posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK-S). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 eyes of 55 patients enrolled in a single-center study underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty with a hybrid lamella DMEK-S implanted using a solution implantation technique, owing to endothelial dysfunction. The outcome measures studied were visual acuity and endothelial cell density. RESULTS: The rate of endothelial cell loss caused by surgery was 43.8%. During followups, we observed the stabilization of postoperative findings, or at minimum a very low rate of corneal endothelial cell loss. The UCDVA and BCDVA dramatically improved postoperatively. The rebubbling rate in our group of patients was 61.9%. We replaced the lamella due to its failure or malfunction in 17 patients (23.9%). CONCLUSION: In summary, DMEK-S combines the advantages of DSEK/DSAEK and DMEK. The central zone of bare Descemet's membrane and endothelium allows for very good visual outcomes, and the peripheral rim allows for better manipulation of the lamella during implantation. It is an effective method of treating the endothelial dysfunction of various etiologies, but the high complication rate needs to be addressed before widespread implementation of the technique in the future.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Melles GRJ, Eggink FAGJ, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lameliar keratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17(6):618–626. PubMed
Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, Slomovic A, Rootman D. Comparison of Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1525–1533. PubMed
Villarrubia A, Palacín E, Aránguez C, Solana J, García-Alonso CR. Complications after endothelial keratoplasty: three years of experience. Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2011;86(6):180–186. PubMed
Jordan CS, Price MO, Trespalacios R, Price FW., Jr. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty—part one: clinical signs and symptoms. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(3):387–390. PubMed
Mashor RS, Kaiserman I, Kumar NL, Sansanayudh W, Rootman DS. Deep Lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Up to 5-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(4):680–686. PubMed
Pieramici D, Green WR, Stark WJ. Stripping of Descemet’s membrane: a clinicopathologic correlation. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1994;25(4):226–231. PubMed
Shulman J, Kropinak M, Ritterband DC, et al. Failed descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts: a clinicopathologic analysis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;148(5):752–759. PubMed
Gorovoy MS, Ratanasit A. Epithelial downgrowth after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29(10):1192–1194. PubMed
Terry MA, Wall JM, Hoar KL, Ousley PJ. A prospective study of endothelial cell loss during the 2 years after deep Lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(4):631–639. PubMed
Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):488–e3. PubMed
Ham L, Dapena I, Van Der Wees J, Melles GRJ. Endothelial cell density after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 3-year follow-up. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;149(6):1016–1017. PubMed
Melles GRJ, Ong TS, Ververs B, Van Der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Cornea. 2006;25(8):987–990. PubMed
Studeny P, Farkas A, Vokrojova M, Liskova P, Jirsova K. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S) British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;94(7):909–914. PubMed
Kim P, Brodbaker E, Litchtinger A, et al. Outcomes of repeat endothelial keratoplasty in patients with failed deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012;31(10):1154–1157. PubMed
Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, et al. Complications of Descemet’s Stripping with Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Survey of 118 Eyes at One Institute. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1517–1524. PubMed
Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price FW., Jr. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):725–729. PubMed