Medial calcar of proximal humeral fracture as landmark in restoration of humeral length in case of hemiarthroplasty
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- fraktury humeru chirurgie MeSH
- hemiartroplastika MeSH
- humerus anatomie a histologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
PURPOSE: Several methods to restore the appropriate length of the humerus in the case of proximal humeral fractures treated by hemiarthroplasty have been previously published. Our study evaluates the possibility of using the medial calcar of humerus for humeral length reconstruction not based on preoperative planning. METHODS: Preparations of 320 dry humeral bones were used for the purpose of the study. Points of interest were marked on each bone: the most proximal point of the humeral head, the crest of greater tuberosity, diameters of the head, the anatomical and surgical necks. Proximal parts of bones were then scanned from two angles with a digital camera and all measurements were performed on calibrated photographs. We compared accuracy in humeral length reconstruction using insertion of the pectoralis major and the area of medial calcar where usually a fracture develops. RESULTS: The distance between the top part of the humeral head and the insertion of pectoralis major was 54.1 ± 6.0 mm. The distance between the lateral margin of the anatomical neck and the medial calcar was 51.4 ± 4.3 mm. We compared these data with diameters of the humeral head. CONCLUSIONS: The site of the fracture can be used for the reconstruction of the humeral length with greater accuracy than area of the pectoralis major insertion. We suggest that to obtain the final distance between the lateral margin of the artificial head and medial calcar of the fracture 2-3 mm should be added to the diameter of the head.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1090-103 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;13(2):239-47 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2 Suppl):S47-60 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;17(6):947-50 PubMed
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Sep;79(5):857-65 PubMed
Injury. 2008 Dec;39(12):1345-58 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):401-12 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;15(6):675-8 PubMed
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Oct;(307):27-36 PubMed
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1077-89 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;12(6):569-77 PubMed
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1594-602 PubMed
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Oct;(170):189-95 PubMed
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1215-23 PubMed
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Sep-Oct;17(5):709-14 PubMed
Orthop Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;39(4):441-50, vi PubMed
Internal architecture of the proximal femur: calcar femorale or Adams' arch?