Fitness and proteome changes accompanying the development of erythromycin resistance in a population of Escherichia coli grown in continuous culture
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23996919
PubMed Central
PMC3831644
DOI
10.1002/mbo3.121
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Continuous cultivation system, Escherichia coli, erythromycin, fitness, proteome, resistance,
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial genetics MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Erythromycin pharmacology MeSH
- Escherichia coli drug effects genetics metabolism MeSH
- Genetic Fitness drug effects MeSH
- Culture Media MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests MeSH
- Escherichia coli Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Proteome genetics metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anti-Bacterial Agents MeSH
- Erythromycin MeSH
- Culture Media MeSH
- Escherichia coli Proteins MeSH
- Proteome MeSH
We studied the impact of a sublethal concentration of erythromycin on the fitness and proteome of a continuously cultivated population of Escherichia coli. The development of resistance to erythromycin in the population was followed over time by the gradient plate method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements. We measured the growth rate, standardized efficiency of synthesis of radiolabeled proteins, and translation accuracy of the system. The proteome changes were followed over time in two parallel experiments that differed in the presence or absence of erythromycin. A comparison of the proteomes at each time point (43, 68, and 103 h) revealed a group of unique proteins differing in expression. From all 35 proteins differing throughout the cultivation, only three were common to more than one time point. In the final population, a significant proportion of upregulated proteins was localized to the outer or inner cytoplasmic membranes or to the periplasmic space. In a population growing for more than 100 generations in the presence of antibiotic, erythromycin-resistant bacterial clones with improved fitness in comparison to early resistant culture predominated. This phenomenon was accompanied by distinct changes in protein expression during a stepwise, population-based development of erythromycin resistance.
See more in PubMed
Andersson DI. Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003;6:452–456. PubMed
Andersson DI, Hughes D. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:260–271. PubMed
Andersson S, Kurland CG. Elongating ribosomes in vivo are refractory to erythromycin. Biochimie. 1987;69:901–904. PubMed
Bernier SP, Letoffe S, Delepierre M, Ghigo JM. Biogenic ammonia modifies antibiotic resistance at a distance in physically separated bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;81:705–716. PubMed
Chastre J. Evolving problems with resistant pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008;14:3–14. PubMed
Chittum HS, Champney WS. Ribosomal-protein gene sequence changes in erythromycin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1994;176:6192–6198. PubMed PMC
Delcour AH. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1794:808–816. PubMed PMC
Gaynor M, Mankin AS. Macrolide antibiotics: binding site, mechanism of action, resistance. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003;3:949–960. PubMed
Gibson F, Mcdougall B, Jones MJ, Teltscher H. The action of antibiotics on indole synthesis by cell suspensions of Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1956;15:446–458. PubMed
Hoskisson PA, Hobbs G. Continuous culture-making a comeback? Microbiology. 2005;151:3153–3159. PubMed
Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. Polyamine modulon in Escherichia coli: genes involved in the stimulation of cell growth by polyamines. J. Biochem. 2006;139:11–16. PubMed
Iyer R, Delcour AH. Complex inhibition of OmpF and OmpC bacterial porins by polyamines. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:18595–18601. PubMed
Knight CG, Zitzmann N, Prabhakar S, Antrobus R, Dwek R, Hebestreit H, et al. Unraveling adaptive evolution: how a single point mutation affects the protein coregulation network. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:1015–1022. PubMed
Kurland CG. Translational accuracy and the fitness of bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1992;26:29–50. PubMed
Lee HH, Molla MN, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Bacterial charity work leads to population-wide resistance. Nature. 2010;467:82–85. PubMed PMC
Len ACL, Cordwell SJ, Harty DWS, Jacques NA. Cellular and extracellular proteome analysis of Streptococcus mutans grown in a chemostat. Proteomics. 2003;3:627–646. PubMed
Lovmar M, Ehrenberg M. Rate, accuracy and cost of ribosomes in bacterial cells. Biochimie. 2006;88:951–961. PubMed
Malek I, Ricica J. Continuous cultivation of microorganisms – a review. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 1966;11:479–535. PubMed
Mankin AS. Macrolide myths. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008;11:414–421. PubMed PMC
Normark S, Boman HG, Matsson E. Mutant of Escherichia coli with anomalous cell division and ability to decrease episomally and chromosomally mediated resistance to ampicillin and several other antibiotics. J. Bacteriol. 1969;97:1334–1342. PubMed PMC
Pardee AB, Jacob F, Monod J. Genetic control and cytoplasmic expression of inducibility in the synthesis of beta-galactosidase by E. coli. J. Mol. Biol. 1959;1:165–178.
Schultz DW, Yarus M. A simple and sensitive in vivo luciferase assay for tRNA-mediated nonsense suppression. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:595–602. PubMed PMC
Toprak E, Veres A, Michel JB, Chait R, Hartl DL, Kishony R. Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:101–105. PubMed PMC
Weisblum B. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995;39:577–585. PubMed PMC