Effect of ethanol and hydrogen peroxide on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) biosynthetic pathway in Cupriavidus necator H16

. 2010 Jul ; 26 (7) : 1261-7. [epub] 20100107

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid24026931

Exposition of Cupriavidus necator to ethanol or hydrogen peroxide at the beginning of the stationary phase increases poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) yields about 30%. Hydrogen peroxide enhances activity of pentose phosphate pathway that probably consequently increases intracellular ratio NADPH/NADP(+). This effect leads to stimulation of the flux of acetyl-CoA into PHB biosynthetic pathway and to an increase of enzymatic activities of β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase while activity of PHB synthase remains uninfluenced. During ethanol metabolisation, in which alcohol dehydrogenase is involved, acetyl-CoA and reduced coenzymes NAD(P)H are formed. These metabolites could again slightly inhibit TCA cycle while flux of acetyl-CoA into PHB biosynthetic pathway is likely to be supported. As a consequence of TCA cycle inhibition also less free CoA is formed. Similarly with hydrogen peroxide, activities of β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase are increased which results in over-production of PHB. Molecular weight of PHB produced under stress conditions was significantly higher as compared to control cultivation. Particular molecular weight values were dependent on stress factor concentrations. This could indicate some interconnection among activities of β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB molecular weight control in vivo.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Biotechnol. 2001 Mar 30;86(2):97-104 PubMed

Curr Microbiol. 2004 Sep;49(3):170-4 PubMed

Biochem J. 1998 Mar 1;330 ( Pt 2):811-7 PubMed

Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 PubMed

Microbiology (Reading). 1994 Jan;140 ( Pt 1):173-83 PubMed

Biochem J. 1973 May;134(1):239-48 PubMed

J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;16(1-2):91-108 PubMed

Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005;31(2):55-67 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6279-83 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1972 Dec;50(6):750-5 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jan;55(1):17-22 PubMed

Int Microbiol. 2000 Mar;3(1):3-8 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(6):587-624 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun;69(6):3244-50 PubMed

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997 Feb;47(2):140-3 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):1977-82 PubMed

Mikrobiologiia. 2007 Nov-Dec;76(6):908-11 PubMed

Biochem J. 1971 Nov;125(1):55-66 PubMed

J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2006 Aug;52(4):209-14 PubMed

Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Jan;15(1):63-7 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):2762-4 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Nov;276(1):34-41 PubMed

Int J Biol Macromol. 1999 Jun-Jul;25(1-3):69-77 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1991 Feb;173(3):968-77 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...