Effect of ethanol and hydrogen peroxide on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) biosynthetic pathway in Cupriavidus necator H16
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Exposition of Cupriavidus necator to ethanol or hydrogen peroxide at the beginning of the stationary phase increases poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) yields about 30%. Hydrogen peroxide enhances activity of pentose phosphate pathway that probably consequently increases intracellular ratio NADPH/NADP(+). This effect leads to stimulation of the flux of acetyl-CoA into PHB biosynthetic pathway and to an increase of enzymatic activities of β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase while activity of PHB synthase remains uninfluenced. During ethanol metabolisation, in which alcohol dehydrogenase is involved, acetyl-CoA and reduced coenzymes NAD(P)H are formed. These metabolites could again slightly inhibit TCA cycle while flux of acetyl-CoA into PHB biosynthetic pathway is likely to be supported. As a consequence of TCA cycle inhibition also less free CoA is formed. Similarly with hydrogen peroxide, activities of β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase are increased which results in over-production of PHB. Molecular weight of PHB produced under stress conditions was significantly higher as compared to control cultivation. Particular molecular weight values were dependent on stress factor concentrations. This could indicate some interconnection among activities of β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB molecular weight control in vivo.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Biotechnol. 2001 Mar 30;86(2):97-104 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 2004 Sep;49(3):170-4 PubMed
Biochem J. 1998 Mar 1;330 ( Pt 2):811-7 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 1994 Jan;140 ( Pt 1):173-83 PubMed
Biochem J. 1973 May;134(1):239-48 PubMed
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;16(1-2):91-108 PubMed
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005;31(2):55-67 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6279-83 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 1972 Dec;50(6):750-5 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2010 Jan;55(1):17-22 PubMed
Int Microbiol. 2000 Mar;3(1):3-8 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(6):587-624 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jun;69(6):3244-50 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997 Feb;47(2):140-3 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):1977-82 PubMed
Mikrobiologiia. 2007 Nov-Dec;76(6):908-11 PubMed
Biochem J. 1971 Nov;125(1):55-66 PubMed
J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2006 Aug;52(4):209-14 PubMed
Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Jan;15(1):63-7 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):2762-4 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Nov;276(1):34-41 PubMed
Int J Biol Macromol. 1999 Jun-Jul;25(1-3):69-77 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1991 Feb;173(3):968-77 PubMed