Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24237728
DOI
10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.010
PII: S2212-4403(13)00428-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- artefakty MeSH
- audiovizuální záznam MeSH
- fyzické omezení metody MeSH
- hluk MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová tomografie s kuželovým svazkem * MeSH
- pohyb * MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- vibrace MeSH
- zrak MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed (1) to determine whether scanner arm rotation causes significant movement of the head restraint and (2) to measure patient movement and its variation during the scan. STUDY DESIGN: The iCAT scanner and a high-speed camera were used. The 40 patients were divided into 2 groups: the open-eyed group and the blindfolded group. RESULTS: The mean level of head restraint movement was 0.130 mm, with a significantly higher level at the beginning, probably owing to the accelerating arm. Mean movement of patients was 1.135 mm and 1.119 mm in the open-eyed and blindfolded groups, respectively. Patient movement was also significantly higher at the beginning of the scan, when noise and vibrations are likely to surprise the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Patient instruction and a dry-run scan should be done by clinicians. Manufacturers should consider separating the seat and head restraint from the rest of the scanner to avoid vibration transfer.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Neural Basis of Etiopathogenesis and Treatment of Cervicogenic Orofacial Pain