Previous research has shown that lay people can accurately assess male sexual orientation based on limited information, such as face, voice, or behavioral display. Gender-atypical traits are thought to serve as cues to sexual orientation. We investigated the presumed mechanisms of sexual orientation attribution using a standardized set of facial and vocal stimuli of Czech men. Both types of stimuli were rated for sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity by non-student heterosexual women and homosexual men. Our data showed that by evaluating vocal stimuli both women and homosexual men can judge sexual orientation of the target men in agreement with their self-reported sexual orientation. Nevertheless, only homosexual men accurately attributed sexual orientation of the two groups from facial images. Interestingly, facial images of homosexual targets were rated as more masculine than heterosexual targets. This indicates that attributions of sexual orientation are affected by stereotyped association between femininity and male homosexuality; however, reliance on such cues can lead to frequent misjudgments as was the case with the female raters. Although our study is based on a community sample recruited in a non-English speaking country, the results are generally consistent with the previous research and thus corroborate the validity of sexual orientation attributions.

Center for Theoretical Study Charles University and the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sandfort TGM (2005) Sexual orientation and gender: Stereotypes and beyond. Arch Sex Behav 34: 595–611. PubMed

Shelp SG (2002) Gaydar: Visual detection of sexual orientation among gay and straight men. J Homosex 44: 1–14. PubMed

Tskhay KO, Rule NO (2013) Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups a review and meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 17: 72–86. PubMed

Gaudio RP (1994) Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69: 30–57.

Linville SE (1998) Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men's speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop 50: 35–48. PubMed

Rieger G, Linsenmeier J, Gygax L, Garcia S, Bailey JM (2010) Dissecting "Gaydar": Accuracy and the role of masculinity–femininity. Arch Sex Behav 39: 124–140. PubMed

Ambady N, Hallahan M, Conner B (1999) Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 538–547. PubMed

Johnson KL, Gill S, Reichman V, Tassinary LG (2007) Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. J Pers Soc Psychol 93: 321–334. PubMed

Rieger G, Linsenmeier J, Gygax L, Bailey JM (2008) Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: evidence from home videos. Dev Psychol 44: 46–58. PubMed

Valentova JV, Varella MAC, Bartova K (under review) Body appearance and self-grooming can cue to sexual orientation of Czech men. J Appl Soc Psych.

Rule NO, Ambady N (2008) Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. J Exp Soc Psychol 44: 1100–1105.

Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams J, Macrae CN (2008) Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 95: 1019–1028. PubMed

Tabak JA, Zayas V (2012) The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation. PLoS One 7: e36671. PubMed PMC

Valentova J, Rieger G, Havlicek J, Linsenmeier JAW, Bailey JM (2011) Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: A cross-cultural comparison. Arch Sex Behav 40: 1145–1152. PubMed

Rule NO, Ishii K, Ambady N, Rosen KS, Hallett KC (2011) Found in translation: Cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation. Pers Soc Psy Bull 37, 1499–1507. PubMed

Bailey JM, Zucker KJ (1995) Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Dev Psychol 31: 43–55.

Rahman Q, Wilson GD (2003) Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual orientation. Pers Indiv Differ 34: 1337–1382.

Dunkle JH, Francis PL (1990) The role of facial masculinity/femininity in the attribution of homosexuality. Sex Roles 23: 157–167.

Johnson KL, Ghavami N (2011) At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS One 6: e18025. PubMed PMC

Munson B (2007) The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Lang Speech 50: 125–142. PubMed

Pierrehumbert JB, Bent T, Munson B, Bradlow AR, Bailey JM (2004) The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production (L). J Acoust Soc Am 116: 1905–1908. PubMed

Cartei V, Reby D (2012) Acting gay: Male actors shift the frequency components of their voices towards female values when playing homosexual characters. J Nonverbal Behav 36: 79–93.

Rendall D, Vasey P, McKenzie J (2008) The Queen's English: An alternative, biosocial hypothesis for the distinctive features of "gay speech". Arch Sex Behav 37: 188–204. PubMed

Munson B, McDonald EC, DeBoe NL, White AR (2006) The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech. J Phonetics 34: 202–240.

Van Borsel J, De Bruyn E, Lefebvre E, Sokoloff A, De Ley S, et al. (2009) The prevalence of lisping in gay men. J Commun Disorders 42: 100–106. PubMed

Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world. Behav Brain Sci 33: 61–83. PubMed

Kulick D (2000) Gay and lesbian language. Annu Rev Anthrop 29: 243–285.

Valentová J, Roberts SC, Havlíček J (2013) Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: the role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. Perception 42: 187–197. PubMed

Jacobs G, Smyth R, Rogers H (2006) Language and sexuality: Searching for the phonetic correlates of gay- and straight-sounding male voices. Toronto working papers in linguistics: 46–61.

Avery JD, Liss JM (1996) Acoustic characteristics of less-masculine-sounding male speech. J Acoust Soc Am 99: 3738–3748. PubMed

Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2005) Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voice. Anim Behav 69: 561–568.

Brambilla M, Riva P, Rule NO (2013) Familiarity increases the accuracy of categorizing male sexual orientation. Pers Indiv Differ 55: 193–195.

Freeman JB, Johnson KL, Ambady N, Rule NO (2010) Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Pers Soc Psychol B 36: 1318–1331. PubMed

Moskowitz D, Turrubiates J, Lozano H, Hajek C (2013) Physical, behavioral, and psychological traits of gay men identifying as Bears. Arch Sex Behav 42: 775–784. PubMed PMC

Nováková L, Valentova J, Havlíček J (in press) Olfactory performance in men and women is predicted by their gender nonconformity but not sexual orientation. PLoS One. PubMed PMC

Valentova JV, Kleisner K, Havlíček J, Neustupa J (2013) Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0194-x PubMed DOI

Vocal Parameters of Speech and Singing Covary and Are Related to Vocal Attractiveness, Body Measures, and Sociosexuality: A Cross-Cultural Study