Perceived vocal attractiveness and measured sex-dimorphic vocal parameters are both associated with underlying individual qualities. Research tends to focus on speech but singing is another highly evolved communication system that has distinct and universal features with analogs in other species, and it is relevant in mating. Both speaking and singing voice provides relevant information about its producer. We tested whether speech and singing function as "backup signals" that indicate similar underlying qualities. Using a sample of 81 men and 86 women from Brazil and the Czech Republic, we investigated vocal attractiveness rated from speech and singing and its association with fundamental frequency (F0), apparent vocal tract length (VTL), body characteristics, and sociosexuality. F0, VTL, and rated attractiveness of singing and speaking voice strongly correlated within the same individual. Lower-pitched speech in men, higher-pitched speech and singing in women, individuals who like to sing more, and singing of individuals with a higher pitch modulation were perceived as more attractive. In men, physical size positively predicted speech and singing attractiveness. Male speech but not singing attractiveness was associated with higher sociosexuality. Lower-pitched male speech was related to higher sociosexuality, while lower-pitched male singing was linked to lower sociosexuality. Similarly, shorter speech VTL and longer singing VTL predicted higher sociosexuality in women. Different vocal displays function as "backup signals" cueing to attractiveness and body size, but their relation to sexual strategies in men and women differs. Both singing and speech may indicate evolutionarily relevant individual qualities shaped by sexual selection.

Department of Basic Psychological Processes University of Brasília Brasília Brazil

Department of Experimental Psychology Institute of Psychology University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czechia

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Åkerlund L., Gramming P. (1994). Average loudness level, mean fundamental frequency, and subglottal pressure: comparison between female singers and nonsingers. J. Voice 8 263–270. 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80298-x PubMed DOI

Apicella C. L., Feinberg D. R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter – gatherers. Proc. R. Soc. B 276 1077–1082. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1542 PubMed DOI PMC

Apicella C. L., Feinberg D. R., Marlowe F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biol. Lett. 3 682–684. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0410 PubMed DOI PMC

Babel M., McGuire G., King J. (2014). Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness. PLoS One 9:e88616. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088616 PubMed DOI PMC

Barsties B., Verfaillie R., Roy N., Maryn Y. (2013). Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females? Codas 25 310–318. PubMed

Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V. (2019). Femininity in men and masculinity in women is positively related to sociosexuality. Pers. Individ. Differ. 152:109575 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109575 DOI

Boersma P., Weenink D. (2013). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program], Version 5.3.42. Available at: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ 10.1590/s2317-17822013000400003 (accessed July, 2019). DOI

Borkowska B., Pawlowski B. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. Anim. Behav. 82 55–59.10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.024 DOI

Broesch T. L., Bryant G. A. (2015). Prosody in infant-directed speech is similar across western and traditional cultures. J. Cogn. Dev. 16 31–43. 10.1080/15248372.2013.833923 DOI

Bro-Jørgensen J. (2010). Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25 292–300. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003 PubMed DOI

Brown D. E. (1991). Human Universals. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Brown S. (2001). “The “musilanguage” model of music evolution,” in The Origins of Music, eds Wallin N. L., Merker B., Brown S., (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 271–300.

Brown S. (2017). A joint prosodic origin of language and music. Front. Psychol. 8:1894. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01894 PubMed DOI PMC

Bruckert L., Liénard J.-S., Lacroix A., Kreutzer M., Leboucher G. (2006). Women use voice parameters to assess men’s characteristics. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273 83–89. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3265 PubMed DOI PMC

Busch S. L. (2013). Beyond Singer vs. Non-singer in Singing, Health and Well-being: Development and Testing of the Singing Experience Scale. Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.

Charlton B. D. (2014). Menstrual cycle phase alters women’s sexual preferences for composers of more complex music. Proc. R. Soc. B 281:20140403. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0403 PubMed DOI PMC

Christiner M., Reiterer S. M. (2013). Song and speech: examining the link between singing talent and speech imitation ability. Front. Psychol. 4:874. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00874 PubMed DOI PMC

Collins S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Anim. Behav. 60 773–780. PubMed

Collins S. A., Missing C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Anim. Behav. 65 997–1004. 10.1006/anbe.2003.2123 PubMed DOI

Corretge R. (2019). Praat Vocal Toolkit. Available at: http://www.praatvocaltoolkit.com (accessed July, 2019).

Darwin C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray.

Dixson A. F., Halliwell G., East R., Wignarajah P., Anderson M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Arch. Sex. Behav. 32 29–39. 10.1023/a:1021889228469 PubMed DOI

Dukes R. L., Bisel T. M., Borega K. N., Lobato E. A., Owens M. D. (2003). Expressions of love, sex, and hurt in popular songs: a content analysis of all-time greatest hits. Soc. Sci. J. 40 643–650. 10.1016/s0362-3319(03)00075-2 DOI

Evans S., Neave N., Wakelin D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biol. Psychol. 72 160–163. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.09.003 PubMed DOI

Evans S., Neave N., Wakelin D., Hamilton C. (2008). The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiol. Behav. 93 783–788. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.033 PubMed DOI

Feinberg D. R., Jones B. C., Little A. C., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Anim. Behav. 69 561–568. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.012 DOI

Filippi P. (2016). Emotional and interactional prosody across animal communication systems: a comparative approach to the emergence of language. Front. Psychol. 7:1393. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01393 PubMed DOI PMC

Fitch W. T. (2005). The evolution of language: a comparative review. Biol. Philos. 20 193–203. 10.1007/s10539-005-5597-1 DOI

Fitch W. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective. Cognition 100 173–215. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.009 PubMed DOI

Foulkes P., Docherty G. J., Watt D. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81 177–206. 10.3109/02699206.2015.1115555 PubMed DOI

Fraccaro P. J., Jones B. C., Vukovic J., Smith F. G., Watkins C. D., Feinberg D. R., et al. (2011). Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive. J. Evol. Psychol. 9 57–67. 10.1556/jep.9.2011.33.1 DOI

Garland H., Brown B. R. (1972). Face-saving as affected by subjects’ sex, audiences’ sex and audience expertise. Sociometry 35 280–289. PubMed

Hall M. L., Kingma S. A., Peters A. (2013). Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PLoS One 8:e56717. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056717 PubMed DOI PMC

Hodges-Simeon C. R., Gaulin S. J., Puts D. A. (2011). Voice correlates of mating success in men: examining “contests” versus “mate choice” modes of sexual selection. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40 551–557. 10.1007/s10508-010-9625-0 PubMed DOI

Hodges-Simeon C. R., Gurven M., Gaulin S. J. C. (2015). The low male voice is a costly signal of phenotypic quality among Bolivian adolescents. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36 294–302. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.002 DOI

Hughes S. M., Dispenza F., Gallup G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25 295–304. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001 DOI

Hughes S. M., Mogilski J. K., Harrison M. A. (2014). The perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. J. Nonverbal. Behav. 38 107–127. 10.1007/s10919-013-0163-z DOI

Isenstein S. (2016). Singing Voice Attractiveness. Master thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.

Janik V. M. (2013). Cognitive skills in bottlenose dolphin communication. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 157–159. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.005 PubMed DOI

Johnstone R. A. (1996). Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 351 329–338. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0026 DOI

Jost L., Fuchs M., Loeffler M., Thiery J., Kratzsch J., Berger T., et al. (2018). Associations of sex hormones and anthropometry with the speaking voice profile in the adult general population. J. Voice 32 261–272. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.011 PubMed DOI

Juslin P. N., Laukka P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code? Psychol. Bull. 129 770–814. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770 PubMed DOI

Kachel S., Radtke A., Skuk V. G., Zäske R., Simpson A. P., Steffens M. C. (2018). Investigating the common set of acoustic parameters in sexual orientation groups: a voice averaging approach. PLoS One 13:e0208686. 10.1371/journal.pone.0208686 PubMed DOI PMC

Kaufman S. B., Kozbelt A., Silvia P., Kaufman J. C., Ramesh S., Feist G. J. (2016). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. J. Creat. Behav. 50 294–307. 10.1002/jocb.78 DOI

Klofstad C. A., Anderson R. C., Peters S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279 2698–2704. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0311 PubMed DOI PMC

Leanderson R., Sundberg J., Von Euler C. (1987). Breathing muscle activity and subglottal pressure dynamics in singing and speech. J. Voice 1 258–261. 10.1016/s0892-1997(87)80009-7 DOI

Lehmann C., Welker L., Schiefenhövel W. (2009). Towards an ethology of song: a categorization of musical behaviour. Music. Sci. 13 321–338. 10.1177/1029864909013002141 DOI

Leongómez J. D., Binter J., Kubicová L., Stolařová P., Klapilová K., Havlíček J., et al. (2014). Vocal modulation during courtship increases proceptivity even in naive listeners. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35 489–496. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.008 DOI

Levitin D. J. (2008). The World in Six Songs: How the Musical Brain Created Human Nature. New York, NY: Penguin.

Little A. C., Jones B. C., Penton-Voak I. S., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 269 1095–1100. 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984 PubMed DOI PMC

Ma W., Fiveash A., Thompson W. F. (2019). Spontaneous emergence of language-like and music-like vocalizations from an artificial protolanguage. Semiotica 229 1–23. 10.1515/sem-2018-0139 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI

Mehr S. A., Singh M., York H., Glowacki L., Krasnow M. M. (2018). Form and function in human song. Curr. Biol. 28 356–368. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.042 PubMed DOI PMC

Mennen I., Schaeffler F., Docherty G. (2012). Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 2249–2260. 10.1121/1.3681950 PubMed DOI

Miller G. (2000). “Evolution of human music through sexual selection,” in The Origins of Music, eds Wallin N. L., Merker B., Brown S., (Cambridge MA: MIT Press; ), 329–360.

Mithen S. (2005). The Singing Neanderthal. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

Moshontz H., Campbell L., Ebersole C. R., IJzerman H., Urry H. L., Forscher P. S., et al. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Adv. Meth. Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1 501–515. PubMed PMC

Neumann K., Schunda P., Lehmann C., Euler H. A. (2008). Attractiveness of the high male speaking and singing voice. Paper Presented at Conference Choice for the Voice of the British Voice Association, London.

Ostrander G. M., Pipitone R. N., Shoup-Knox M. L. (2018). Interactions between observer and stimuli fertility status: endocrine and perceptual responses to intrasexual vocal fertility cues. Horm. Behav. 98 191–197. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.12.008 PubMed DOI

Park H., Lee S., Kim H. J., Ju Y. S., Shin J. Y., Hong D., et al. (2012). Comprehensive genomic analyses associate UGT8 variants with musical ability in a Mongolian population. J. Med. Genet. 49 747–752. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101209 PubMed DOI PMC

Penke L., Asendorpf J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95 1113–1135. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 PubMed DOI

Pereira K. J., da Silva C. S. A., Havlíček J., Kleisner K., Varella M. A. C., Pavlovič O., et al. (2019). Femininity-masculinity and attractiveness – Associations between self-ratings, third-party ratings and objective measures. Pers. Individ. Differ. 147 166–171. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.033 DOI

Peretz I., Coltheart M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nat. Neurosci. 6 688–691. 10.1038/nn1083 PubMed DOI

Pisanski K., Cartei V., McGettigan C., Raine J., Reby D. (2016). Voice modulation: a window into the origins of human vocal control? Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 304–318. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.002 PubMed DOI

Pisanski K., Feinberg D. R. (2019). “Vocal attractiveness,” in Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception, eds Frühholz S., Belin P., (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 607–625.

Pisanski K., Fraccaro P. J., Tigue C. C., O’Connor J. J. M., Röder S., Andrews P. W., et al. (2014). Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 95 89–99. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.011 DOI

Pisanski K., Oleszkiewicz A., Plachetka J., Gmiterek M., Reby D. (2018). Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. B 285:20181634. 10.1098/rspb.2018.1634 PubMed DOI PMC

Puts D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26 388–397. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.001 DOI

Puts D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31 157–175. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005 DOI

Puts D. A., Barndt J. L., Welling L. L., Dawood K., Burriss R. P. (2011). Intrasexual competition among women: vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 50 111–115. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.011 DOI

Puts D. A., Gaulin S. J. C., Verdolini K. V. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27 283–296. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.003 DOI

Puts D. A., Hill A. K., Bailey D. H., Walker R. S., Rendall D., Wheatley J. R., et al. (2016). Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283:20152830. 10.1098/rspb.2015.2830 PubMed DOI PMC

Puts D. A., Hodges C. R., Cárdenas R. A., Gaulin S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28 340–344. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.002 DOI

Raine J., Pisanski K., Bond R., Simner J., Reby D. (2019). Human roars communicate upper-body strength more effectively than do screams or aggressive and distressed speech. PLoS One 14:e0213034. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213034 PubMed DOI PMC

Raine J., Pisanski K., Oleszkiewicz A., Simner J., Reby D. (2018). Human listeners can accurately judge strength and height relative to self from aggressive roars and speech. iScience 4 273–280. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.05.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Rowe M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Dev. 83 1762–1774. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x PubMed DOI PMC

Savage P. E., Tierney A. T., Patel A. D. (2017). Global music recordings support the motor constraint hypothesis for human and avian song contour. Music Percept. 34 327–334. 10.1525/mp.2017.34.3.327 DOI

Saxton T. K., Mackey L. L., McCarty K., Neave N. (2015). A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. Behav. Ecol. 27 512–519. 10.1093/beheco/arv178 PubMed DOI PMC

Searcy W. A., Andersson M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 17 507–533.

Šebesta P., Kleisner K., Tureček P., Kočnar T., Akoko R. M., Třebický V., et al. (2017). Voices of Africa: acoustic predictors of human male vocal attractiveness. Anim. Behav. 127 205–211. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.014 DOI

Šebesta P., Třebický V., Fialová J., Havlíček J. (2019). Roar of a champion: loudness and voice pitch predict perceived fighting ability but not success in MMA fighters. Front. Psychol. 10:859. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00859 PubMed DOI PMC

Sell A., Bryant G. A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., Von Rueden C., et al. (2010). Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. Proc. R. Soc. B 277 3509–3518. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0769 PubMed DOI PMC

Shirazi T. N., Puts D. A., Escasa-Dorne M. J. (2018). Filipino women’s preferences for male voice pitch: intra-individual, life history, and hormonal predictors. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 4 188–206. 10.1007/s40750-018-0087-2 DOI

Slobodchikoff C. N., Kiriazis J., Fischer C., Creef E. (1991). Semantic information distinguishing individual predators in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Anim. Behav. 42 713–719. 10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80117-4 PubMed DOI

Smith E. A., Bird R. L. B. (2000). Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: public generosity as costly signaling. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21 245–261. 10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00031-3 PubMed DOI

Spinelli M., Fasolo M., Mesman J. (2017). Does prosody make the difference? A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. Devel. Rev. 44 1–18. 10.1016/j.dr.2016.12.001 DOI

Stulp G., Buunk A. P., Pollet T. V., Nettle D., Verhulst S. (2013). Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PLoS One 8:e54186. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054186 PubMed DOI PMC

Sundberg J. (1977). The acoustics of the singing voice. Sci. Am. 236 82–91. 10.1038/scientificamerican0377-82 PubMed DOI

Sundberg J. (2003). Research on the singing voice in retrospect. TMH QPSR 45 11–22.

Sundberg J. (2018). “The singing voice,” in The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception, eds Fruhholz S., Belin P., (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 117–142.

Tchernof A., Després J. P., Bélanger A., Dupont A., Prud’homme D., Moorjani S., et al. (1995). Reduced testosterone and adrenal C19 steroid levels in obese men. Metabolism 44 513–519. 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90060-8 PubMed DOI

Trehub S. E., Plantinga J., Brcic J. (2009). Infants detect cross-modal cues to identity in speech and singing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169 508–511. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04851.x PubMed DOI

Valentová J., Roberts S. C., Havlíček J. (2013). Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: the role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. Perception 42 187–197. 10.1068/p6909 PubMed DOI

Valentova J. V., Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Varella M. A. C. (2016). Preferred and actual relative height are related to sex, sexual orientation, and dominance: evidence from Czech Republic and Brazil. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 100 145–150. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.049 DOI

Valentova J. V., Bártová K., Štčrbová Z., Varella M. A. C. (2017a). Influence of sexual orientation, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect on preferences and choices for female buttock size, breast size and shape, and WHR. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 104 313–319. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.005 DOI

Valentova J. V., Havlíček J. (2013). Perceived sexual orientation based on vocal and facial stimuli is linked to self-rated sexual orientation in Czech men. PLoS One 8:e82417. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082417 PubMed DOI PMC

Valentova J. V., Stulp G., Třebický V., Havlíček J. (2014). Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role. PLoS One 9:e86534. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086534 PubMed DOI PMC

Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C., Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Dixson B. J. W. (2017b). Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: influence of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38 241–248. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.007 DOI

Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C., Havlíček J., Kleisner K. (2017c). Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study. Behav. Proc. 135 95–100. 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005 PubMed DOI

Varella M. A. C., Ferreira J. H. B. P., Cosentino L. A. M., Ottoni E., Bussab V. S. R. (2010). Sex differences in aspects of musicality in a Brazilian sample: adaptative hypotheses. Cogn. Music. Arts 4 10–16.

Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V., Fernández A. M. (2017). “Evolution of artistic and aesthetic propensities through female competitive ornamentation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Women and Competition, ed. Fisher M., (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 757–783.

Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V., Pereira K. J., Bussab V. S. R. (2014). Promiscuity is related to masculine and feminine body traits in both men and women: evidence from Brazilian and Czech samples. Behav. Process. 109 34–39. 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.010 PubMed DOI

Vukovic J., Feinberg D. R., DeBruine L., Smith F. G., Jones B. C. (2010). Women’s voice pitch is negatively correlated with health risk factors. J. Evol. Psychol. 8 217–225. 10.1556/JEP.8.2010.3.2 DOI

Wapnick J., Darrow A. A., Kovacs J., Dalrymple L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. J. Res. Music Educ. 45 470–479. 10.2307/3345540 DOI

Welch G. F. (2006). “Singing and vocal development,” in The Child as Musician: A Handbook of Musical Development, ed. McPherson G., (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 311–329.

Weninger F., Wöllmer M., Schuller B. (2011). “Automatic assessment of singer traits in popular music: Gender, age, height and race,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Miami, FL.

White J., Lorenz H., Perilloux C., Lee A. (2018). Creative casanovas: mating strategy predicts using—but not preferring—atypical flirting tactics. Evol. Psych. Sci. 4 443–455. 10.1007/s40806-018-0155-7 DOI

Xu Y., Lee A., Wu W. L., Liu X., Birkholz P. (2013). Human vocal attractiveness as signaled by body size projection. PLoS One 8:e62397. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062397 PubMed DOI PMC

Zarate J. M. (2013). The neural control of singing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:237. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00237 PubMed DOI PMC

Zatorre R. J., Baum S. R. (2012). Musical melody and speech intonation: singing a different tune. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001372. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001372 PubMed DOI PMC

Zumoff B., Strain G. W., Miller L. K., Rosner W., Senie R., Seres D. S., et al. (1990). Plasma free and non-sex-hormone-binding-globulin bound testosterone are decreased in obese men in proportion to their degree of obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 71 929–931. 10.1210/jcem-71-4-929 PubMed DOI

Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate

Evolution of Artistic and Athletic Propensities: Testing of Intersexual Selection and Intrasexual Competition