Vocal Parameters of Speech and Singing Covary and Are Related to Vocal Attractiveness, Body Measures, and Sociosexuality: A Cross-Cultural Study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31695631
PubMed Central
PMC6817625
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02029
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- fitness indicators, fundamental frequency, human voice, music, sociosexuality, song, vocal attractiveness, voice modulation,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Perceived vocal attractiveness and measured sex-dimorphic vocal parameters are both associated with underlying individual qualities. Research tends to focus on speech but singing is another highly evolved communication system that has distinct and universal features with analogs in other species, and it is relevant in mating. Both speaking and singing voice provides relevant information about its producer. We tested whether speech and singing function as "backup signals" that indicate similar underlying qualities. Using a sample of 81 men and 86 women from Brazil and the Czech Republic, we investigated vocal attractiveness rated from speech and singing and its association with fundamental frequency (F0), apparent vocal tract length (VTL), body characteristics, and sociosexuality. F0, VTL, and rated attractiveness of singing and speaking voice strongly correlated within the same individual. Lower-pitched speech in men, higher-pitched speech and singing in women, individuals who like to sing more, and singing of individuals with a higher pitch modulation were perceived as more attractive. In men, physical size positively predicted speech and singing attractiveness. Male speech but not singing attractiveness was associated with higher sociosexuality. Lower-pitched male speech was related to higher sociosexuality, while lower-pitched male singing was linked to lower sociosexuality. Similarly, shorter speech VTL and longer singing VTL predicted higher sociosexuality in women. Different vocal displays function as "backup signals" cueing to attractiveness and body size, but their relation to sexual strategies in men and women differs. Both singing and speech may indicate evolutionarily relevant individual qualities shaped by sexual selection.
Department of Basic Psychological Processes University of Brasília Brasília Brazil
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Åkerlund L., Gramming P. (1994). Average loudness level, mean fundamental frequency, and subglottal pressure: comparison between female singers and nonsingers. PubMed DOI
Apicella C. L., Feinberg D. R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter – gatherers. PubMed DOI PMC
Apicella C. L., Feinberg D. R., Marlowe F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. PubMed DOI PMC
Babel M., McGuire G., King J. (2014). Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness. PubMed DOI PMC
Barsties B., Verfaillie R., Roy N., Maryn Y. (2013). Do body mass index and fat volume influence vocal quality, phonatory range, and aerodynamics in females? PubMed
Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V. (2019). Femininity in men and masculinity in women is positively related to sociosexuality. DOI
Boersma P., Weenink D. (2013). DOI
Borkowska B., Pawlowski B. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. DOI
Broesch T. L., Bryant G. A. (2015). Prosody in infant-directed speech is similar across western and traditional cultures. DOI
Bro-Jørgensen J. (2010). Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. PubMed DOI
Brown D. E. (1991).
Brown S. (2001). “The “musilanguage” model of music evolution,” in
Brown S. (2017). A joint prosodic origin of language and music. PubMed DOI PMC
Bruckert L., Liénard J.-S., Lacroix A., Kreutzer M., Leboucher G. (2006). Women use voice parameters to assess men’s characteristics. PubMed DOI PMC
Busch S. L. (2013).
Charlton B. D. (2014). Menstrual cycle phase alters women’s sexual preferences for composers of more complex music. PubMed DOI PMC
Christiner M., Reiterer S. M. (2013). Song and speech: examining the link between singing talent and speech imitation ability. PubMed DOI PMC
Collins S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. PubMed
Collins S. A., Missing C. (2003). Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. DOI
Corretge R. (2019).
Darwin C. (1871).
Dixson A. F., Halliwell G., East R., Wignarajah P., Anderson M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. PubMed DOI
Dukes R. L., Bisel T. M., Borega K. N., Lobato E. A., Owens M. D. (2003). Expressions of love, sex, and hurt in popular songs: a content analysis of all-time greatest hits. DOI
Evans S., Neave N., Wakelin D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. PubMed DOI
Evans S., Neave N., Wakelin D., Hamilton C. (2008). The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. PubMed DOI
Feinberg D. R., Jones B. C., Little A. C., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. DOI
Filippi P. (2016). Emotional and interactional prosody across animal communication systems: a comparative approach to the emergence of language. PubMed DOI PMC
Fitch W. T. (2005). The evolution of language: a comparative review. DOI
Fitch W. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective. PubMed DOI
Foulkes P., Docherty G. J., Watt D. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. PubMed DOI
Fraccaro P. J., Jones B. C., Vukovic J., Smith F. G., Watkins C. D., Feinberg D. R., et al. (2011). Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive. DOI
Garland H., Brown B. R. (1972). Face-saving as affected by subjects’ sex, audiences’ sex and audience expertise. PubMed
Hall M. L., Kingma S. A., Peters A. (2013). Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PubMed DOI PMC
Hodges-Simeon C. R., Gaulin S. J., Puts D. A. (2011). Voice correlates of mating success in men: examining “contests” versus “mate choice” modes of sexual selection. PubMed DOI
Hodges-Simeon C. R., Gurven M., Gaulin S. J. C. (2015). The low male voice is a costly signal of phenotypic quality among Bolivian adolescents. DOI
Hughes S. M., Dispenza F., Gallup G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. DOI
Hughes S. M., Mogilski J. K., Harrison M. A. (2014). The perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. DOI
Isenstein S. (2016).
Janik V. M. (2013). Cognitive skills in bottlenose dolphin communication. PubMed DOI
Johnstone R. A. (1996). Multiple displays in animal communication: ‘backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. DOI
Jost L., Fuchs M., Loeffler M., Thiery J., Kratzsch J., Berger T., et al. (2018). Associations of sex hormones and anthropometry with the speaking voice profile in the adult general population. PubMed DOI
Juslin P. N., Laukka P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code? PubMed DOI
Kachel S., Radtke A., Skuk V. G., Zäske R., Simpson A. P., Steffens M. C. (2018). Investigating the common set of acoustic parameters in sexual orientation groups: a voice averaging approach. PubMed DOI PMC
Kaufman S. B., Kozbelt A., Silvia P., Kaufman J. C., Ramesh S., Feist G. J. (2016). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. DOI
Klofstad C. A., Anderson R. C., Peters S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. PubMed DOI PMC
Leanderson R., Sundberg J., Von Euler C. (1987). Breathing muscle activity and subglottal pressure dynamics in singing and speech. DOI
Lehmann C., Welker L., Schiefenhövel W. (2009). Towards an ethology of song: a categorization of musical behaviour. DOI
Leongómez J. D., Binter J., Kubicová L., Stolařová P., Klapilová K., Havlíček J., et al. (2014). Vocal modulation during courtship increases proceptivity even in naive listeners. DOI
Levitin D. J. (2008).
Little A. C., Jones B. C., Penton-Voak I. S., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. PubMed DOI PMC
Ma W., Fiveash A., Thompson W. F. (2019). Spontaneous emergence of language-like and music-like vocalizations from an artificial protolanguage. DOI
Mehr S. A., Singh M., York H., Glowacki L., Krasnow M. M. (2018). Form and function in human song. PubMed DOI PMC
Mennen I., Schaeffler F., Docherty G. (2012). Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German. PubMed DOI
Miller G. (2000). “Evolution of human music through sexual selection,” in
Mithen S. (2005).
Moshontz H., Campbell L., Ebersole C. R., IJzerman H., Urry H. L., Forscher P. S., et al. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. PubMed PMC
Neumann K., Schunda P., Lehmann C., Euler H. A. (2008). Attractiveness of the high male speaking and singing voice.
Ostrander G. M., Pipitone R. N., Shoup-Knox M. L. (2018). Interactions between observer and stimuli fertility status: endocrine and perceptual responses to intrasexual vocal fertility cues. PubMed DOI
Park H., Lee S., Kim H. J., Ju Y. S., Shin J. Y., Hong D., et al. (2012). Comprehensive genomic analyses associate UGT8 variants with musical ability in a Mongolian population. PubMed DOI PMC
Penke L., Asendorpf J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. PubMed DOI
Pereira K. J., da Silva C. S. A., Havlíček J., Kleisner K., Varella M. A. C., Pavlovič O., et al. (2019). Femininity-masculinity and attractiveness – Associations between self-ratings, third-party ratings and objective measures. DOI
Peretz I., Coltheart M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. PubMed DOI
Pisanski K., Cartei V., McGettigan C., Raine J., Reby D. (2016). Voice modulation: a window into the origins of human vocal control? PubMed DOI
Pisanski K., Feinberg D. R. (2019). “Vocal attractiveness,” in
Pisanski K., Fraccaro P. J., Tigue C. C., O’Connor J. J. M., Röder S., Andrews P. W., et al. (2014). Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: a meta-analysis. DOI
Pisanski K., Oleszkiewicz A., Plachetka J., Gmiterek M., Reby D. (2018). Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice. PubMed DOI PMC
Puts D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. DOI
Puts D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. DOI
Puts D. A., Barndt J. L., Welling L. L., Dawood K., Burriss R. P. (2011). Intrasexual competition among women: vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness. DOI
Puts D. A., Gaulin S. J. C., Verdolini K. V. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. DOI
Puts D. A., Hill A. K., Bailey D. H., Walker R. S., Rendall D., Wheatley J. R., et al. (2016). Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids. PubMed DOI PMC
Puts D. A., Hodges C. R., Cárdenas R. A., Gaulin S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. DOI
Raine J., Pisanski K., Bond R., Simner J., Reby D. (2019). Human roars communicate upper-body strength more effectively than do screams or aggressive and distressed speech. PubMed DOI PMC
Raine J., Pisanski K., Oleszkiewicz A., Simner J., Reby D. (2018). Human listeners can accurately judge strength and height relative to self from aggressive roars and speech. PubMed DOI PMC
Rowe M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. PubMed DOI PMC
Savage P. E., Tierney A. T., Patel A. D. (2017). Global music recordings support the motor constraint hypothesis for human and avian song contour. DOI
Saxton T. K., Mackey L. L., McCarty K., Neave N. (2015). A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. PubMed DOI PMC
Searcy W. A., Andersson M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song.
Šebesta P., Kleisner K., Tureček P., Kočnar T., Akoko R. M., Třebický V., et al. (2017). Voices of Africa: acoustic predictors of human male vocal attractiveness. DOI
Šebesta P., Třebický V., Fialová J., Havlíček J. (2019). Roar of a champion: loudness and voice pitch predict perceived fighting ability but not success in MMA fighters. PubMed DOI PMC
Sell A., Bryant G. A., Cosmides L., Tooby J., Sznycer D., Von Rueden C., et al. (2010). Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. PubMed DOI PMC
Shirazi T. N., Puts D. A., Escasa-Dorne M. J. (2018). Filipino women’s preferences for male voice pitch: intra-individual, life history, and hormonal predictors. DOI
Slobodchikoff C. N., Kiriazis J., Fischer C., Creef E. (1991). Semantic information distinguishing individual predators in the alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. DOI
Smith E. A., Bird R. L. B. (2000). Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: public generosity as costly signaling. PubMed DOI
Spinelli M., Fasolo M., Mesman J. (2017). Does prosody make the difference? A meta-analysis on relations between prosodic aspects of infant-directed speech and infant outcomes. DOI
Stulp G., Buunk A. P., Pollet T. V., Nettle D., Verhulst S. (2013). Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PubMed DOI PMC
Sundberg J. (1977). The acoustics of the singing voice. PubMed DOI
Sundberg J. (2003). Research on the singing voice in retrospect.
Sundberg J. (2018). “The singing voice,” in
Tchernof A., Després J. P., Bélanger A., Dupont A., Prud’homme D., Moorjani S., et al. (1995). Reduced testosterone and adrenal C19 steroid levels in obese men. PubMed DOI
Trehub S. E., Plantinga J., Brcic J. (2009). Infants detect cross-modal cues to identity in speech and singing. PubMed DOI
Valentová J., Roberts S. C., Havlíček J. (2013). Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: the role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. PubMed DOI
Valentova J. V., Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Varella M. A. C. (2016). Preferred and actual relative height are related to sex, sexual orientation, and dominance: evidence from Czech Republic and Brazil. DOI
Valentova J. V., Bártová K., Štčrbová Z., Varella M. A. C. (2017a). Influence of sexual orientation, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect on preferences and choices for female buttock size, breast size and shape, and WHR. DOI
Valentova J. V., Havlíček J. (2013). Perceived sexual orientation based on vocal and facial stimuli is linked to self-rated sexual orientation in Czech men. PubMed DOI PMC
Valentova J. V., Stulp G., Třebický V., Havlíček J. (2014). Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role. PubMed DOI PMC
Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C., Bártová K., Štěrbová Z., Dixson B. J. W. (2017b). Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: influence of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect. DOI
Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C., Havlíček J., Kleisner K. (2017c). Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study. PubMed DOI
Varella M. A. C., Ferreira J. H. B. P., Cosentino L. A. M., Ottoni E., Bussab V. S. R. (2010). Sex differences in aspects of musicality in a Brazilian sample: adaptative hypotheses.
Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V., Fernández A. M. (2017). “Evolution of artistic and aesthetic propensities through female competitive ornamentation,” in
Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V., Pereira K. J., Bussab V. S. R. (2014). Promiscuity is related to masculine and feminine body traits in both men and women: evidence from Brazilian and Czech samples. PubMed DOI
Vukovic J., Feinberg D. R., DeBruine L., Smith F. G., Jones B. C. (2010). Women’s voice pitch is negatively correlated with health risk factors. DOI
Wapnick J., Darrow A. A., Kovacs J., Dalrymple L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. DOI
Welch G. F. (2006). “Singing and vocal development,” in
Weninger F., Wöllmer M., Schuller B. (2011). “Automatic assessment of singer traits in popular music: Gender, age, height and race,” in
White J., Lorenz H., Perilloux C., Lee A. (2018). Creative casanovas: mating strategy predicts using—but not preferring—atypical flirting tactics. DOI
Xu Y., Lee A., Wu W. L., Liu X., Birkholz P. (2013). Human vocal attractiveness as signaled by body size projection. PubMed DOI PMC
Zarate J. M. (2013). The neural control of singing. PubMed DOI PMC
Zatorre R. J., Baum S. R. (2012). Musical melody and speech intonation: singing a different tune. PubMed DOI PMC
Zumoff B., Strain G. W., Miller L. K., Rosner W., Senie R., Seres D. S., et al. (1990). Plasma free and non-sex-hormone-binding-globulin bound testosterone are decreased in obese men in proportion to their degree of obesity. PubMed DOI
Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate