Since Darwin proposed that human musicality evolved through sexual selection, empirical evidence has supported intersexual selection as one of the adaptive functions of artistic propensities. However, intrasexual competition has been overlooked. We tested their relative importance by investigating the relationship between the self-perceived talent/expertise in 16 artistic and 2 sports modalities and proxies of intersexual selection (i.e., mate value, mating and parenting efforts, sociosexuality, and number of sexual partners) and intrasexual competition (i.e., aggressiveness, intrasexual competitiveness) in heterosexuals. Participants were 82 Brazilian men, 166 Brazilian women, 146 Czech men, and 458 Czech women (Mage = 26.48, SD = 7.12). Factor analysis revealed five factors: Literary-arts (creative writing, humor, acting/theater/film, poetry, storytelling), Visual-arts (painting/drawing, sculpting, handcrafting, culinary arts, architecture design), Musical-arts (playing/instruments, singing, dance, whistling), Circus-arts (juggling, acrobatics), and Sports (individual, collective). Multivariate General Linear Model (GLM) showed more associations of the arts to intersexual selection in women and to intrasexual selection in men, and overall more relationships in women than in men. In women, literary and musical-arts were related to elevated inter- and intrasexual selections proxies, visual and circus-arts were related to elevated intersexual selection proxies, and sports were related to intrasexual selection proxies. In men, literary-arts and sports were related to elevated inter- and intrasexual selection proxies, musical-arts were related to intrasexual proxies, and circus-arts were related to intersexual proxies; visual-arts did not have predictors. Although present in both sexes, each sexual selection component has different relative importance in each sex. Artisticality functions to attract and maintain long/short-term partners, and to compete with mating rivals.

Department of Experimental Psychology Institute of Psychology University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Department of Psychology and Life Sciences Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Psychology Saint Mary's University Halifax NS Canada

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Andersson M. B. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Andrews P. W., Gangestad S. W., Matthews D. (2002). Adaptationism–how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behav. Brain Sci. 25 489–504. 10.1017/s0140525x02000092 PubMed DOI

Apostolou M. (2015). The athlete and the spectator inside the man: a cross-cultural investigation of the evolutionary origins of athletic behavior. Cross Cult. Res. 49 151–173. 10.1177/1069397114536516 DOI

Beaussart M. L., Kaufman S. B., Kaufman J. C. (2012). Creative activity, personality, mental illness, and short-term mating success. J. Creat. Behav. 46 151–167. 10.1002/jocb.11 DOI

Bongard S., Schulz I., Studenroth K. U., Frankenberg E. (2019). Attractiveness ratings for musicians and non-musicians: an evolutionary-psychology perspective. Front. Psychol. 10:2627. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02627 PubMed DOI PMC

Bressler E. R., Balshine S. (2006). The influence of humor on desirability. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27 29–39. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002 DOI

Bressler E. R., Martin R. A., Balshine S. (2006). Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27 121–130. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001 DOI

Buss D. M., Abbott M., Angleitner A., Asherian A., Biaggio A., Blanco-Villasenor A., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: a study of 37 cultures. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 21 5–47. 10.1177/0022022190211001 DOI

Buss D. M., Barnes M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50 559–570. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 DOI

Buunk A. P., Fisher M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. J. Evol. Psychol. 7 37–48. 10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5 DOI

Candolin U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78 575–595. 10.1017/S1464793103006158 PubMed DOI

Carson S. H., Peterson J. B., Higgins D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creat. Res. J. 17 37–50. 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4 DOI

Chang A., Kragness H. E., Tsou W., Bosnyak D. J., Thiede A., Trainor L. J. (2021). Body sway predicts romantic interest in speed dating. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 16 185–192. 10.1093/scan/nsaa093 PubMed DOI PMC

Charlton B. D. (2014). Menstrual cycle phase alters women’s sexual preferences for composers of more complex music. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 281:20140403. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0403 PubMed DOI PMC

Chen B. B., Chang L. (2015). Creativity and aggression as ornament and armament: intersexual and intrasexual selection on men’s mating behaviors. Evol. Psychol. 13:147470491501300118. 10.1177/147470491501300118 PubMed DOI

Clegg H., Nettle D., Miell D. (2011). Status and mating success amongst visual artists. Front. Psychol. 2:310. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00310 PubMed DOI PMC

Darwin C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

Davies S. (2012). The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Block A., Dewitte S. (2007). Mating games: cultural evolution and sexual selection. Biol. Philos. 22 475–491. 10.1007/s10539-006-9041-y DOI

De Block A., Dewitte S. (2009). Darwinism and the cultural evolution of sports. Perspect. Biol. Med. 52 1–16. 10.1353/pbm.0.0063 PubMed DOI

De Tiège A., Verpooten J., Braeckman J. (2021). From animal signals to art: manipulative animal signaling and the evolutionary foundations of aesthetic behavior and art production. Q. Rev. Biol. 96 1–27. 10.1086/713210 DOI

Deaner R. O., Balish S. M., Lombardo M. P. (2016). Sex differences in sports interest and motivation: an evolutionary perspective. Evol. Behav. Sci. 10 73–97. 10.1037/ebs0000049 DOI

Dissanayake E. (2008). “The arts after darwin: does art have an origin and adaptive function?,” in World Art Studies: Exploring Concepts and Approaches, eds Zijlemans K., van Damme W. (Amsterdam: Valiz; ), 241–263. 10.1007/s13187-012-0411-7 DOI

Dutton D. (2009). The Art Instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. (1989). Human Ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Fernandez A. M., Muñoz-Reyes J. A., Dufey M. (2014). BMI, age, mate value, and intrasexual competition in Chilean women. Curr. Psychol. 33 435–450. 10.1007/s12144-014-9221-x DOI

Fink B., Hugill N., Lange B. P. (2012). Women’s body movements are a potential cue to ovulation. Pers. Individ. Differ. 53 759–763. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.005 DOI

Fisher M. L., Candea C. (2012). You ain’t woman enough to take my man: female intrasexual competition as portrayed in songs. J. Soc. Evol. Cult. Psychol. 6:480. 10.1037/h0099238 DOI

Fukui H. (2001). Music and testosterone: a new hypothesis for the origin and function of music. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 930 448–451. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05767.x PubMed DOI

Galasinska K., Szymkow A. (2021). The more fertile, the more creative: changes in women’s creative potential across the ovulatory cycle. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:5390. 10.3390/ijerph18105390 PubMed DOI PMC

Gouveia V. V., Chaves C. M. C. M., Peregrino R. R., Branco A. O. C., Gonçalves M. P. (2008). Medindo a agressão: O questionário de buss-perry. Arq. Bras. Psicol. 60 92–103.

Graves B. M. (2010). Ritualized combat as an indicator of intrasexual selection effects on male life history evolution. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 22 45–49. 10.1002/ajhb.20933 PubMed DOI

Greengross G., Miller G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence 39 188–192. 10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006 DOI

Griskevicius V., Cialdini R. B., Kenrick D. T. (2006). Peacocks, picasso, and parental investment: the effects of romantic motives on creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:63. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.63 PubMed DOI

Harrison M. A., Hughes S. M. (2017). Sex drugs and rock and roll: evidence supporting the storied trilogy. Hum. Ethol. Bull. 32 63–84. 10.22330/heh/323/63-84 DOI

Haselton M. G., Miller G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Hum. Nat. 17 50–73. 10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0 PubMed DOI

Hodges-Simeon C. R., Gaulin S. J., Puts D. A. (2011). Voice correlates of mating success in men: examining “contests” versus “mate choice” modes of sexual selection. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40 551–557. 10.1007/s10508-010-9625-0 PubMed DOI

Hodgson D., Verpooten J. (2015). The evolutionary significance of the arts: exploring the by-product hypothesis in the context of ritual, precursors, and cultural evolution. Biol. Theory 10 73–85.

Hogh-Olesen H. (2018). The Aesthetic Animal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hone L. S., Hurwitz W., Lieberman D. (2015). Sex differences in preferences for humor: a replication, modification, and extension. Evol. Psychol. 13:147470491501300110. 10.1177/147470491501300110 PubMed DOI

Hsu R. M. C. S., Valentova J. V. (2020). Motivation for different physical activities: a comparison among sports, exercises and body/movement practices. Psicol. USP 31:153. 10.1590/0103-6564e190153 DOI

Hsu R. M. C. S., Cardoso F. L., Varella M. A. C., Pires E. M., Valentova J. V. (2022). Comparing different typologies of physical activities with a focus on motivation. Front. Psychol. 2022:2194. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790490 PubMed DOI PMC

Hugill N., Fink B., Neave N., Seydel H. (2009). Men’s physical strength is associated with women’s perceptions of their dancing ability. Pers. Individ. Differ. 47 527–530. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.009 DOI

Jokela M., Rotkirch A., Rickard I. J., Pettay J., Lummaa V. (2010). Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women. Behav. Ecol. 21 906–912. 10.1093/beheco/arq078 DOI

Kalinowski K., Kozłowska A., Malesza M., Danel D. P. (2021). Evolutionary origins of music. classical and recent hypotheses. Anthropol. Rev. 84 213–231. 10.2478/anre-2021-0011 DOI

Kamble S., Shackelford T. K., Pham M., Buss D. M. (2014). Indian mate preferences: continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Pers. Individ. Differ. 70 150–155. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.024 DOI

Karamihalev S. (2013). Why creativity is sexy: a review of the evidence of sexual selection for creative abilities in humans. J. Eur. Psychol. Stud. 4 78–86. 10.5334/jeps.bb DOI

Kaufman S. B., Kozbelt A., Silvia P., Kaufman J. C., Ramesh S., Feist G. J. (2016). Who finds bill gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. J. Creat. Behav. 50 294–307. 10.1002/jocb.78 DOI

Kordsmeyer T. L., Hunt J., Puts D. A., Ostner J., Penke L. (2018). The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evol. Hum. Behav. 39 424–436. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008 DOI

Kruger D. J. (2017). Brief self-report scales assessing life history dimensions of mating and parenting effort. Evol. Psychol. 15:1474704916673840. 10.1177/1474704916673840 PubMed DOI PMC

Lebuda I., Sorokowski P., Groyecka-Bernard A., Marczak M., Gajda A., Jankowska D. M., et al. (2021). Creativity, mating, and reproductive successes outside the WEIRD world. Creat. Res. J. 33 255–263. 10.1080/10400419.2020.1870816 DOI

Li N. P., Bailey J. M., Kenrick D. T., Linsenmeier J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 947–955. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947 PubMed DOI

Lidborg L. H., Cross C. P., Boothroyd L. G. (2022). A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans. Elife 11:e65031. 10.7554/eLife.65031 PubMed DOI PMC

Lombardo M. P. (2012). On the evolution of sport. Evol. Psychol. 10 1–28. 10.1177/147470491201000101 PubMed DOI

Longman D. P., Wells J. C., Stock J. T. (2020). Human athletic paleobiology: using sport as a model to investigate human evolutionary adaptation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 171 42–59. 10.1002/ajpa.23992 PubMed DOI PMC

Low B. S. (1979). “Sexual selection and human ornamentation,” in Evolutionary Biology And Human Social Behavior, eds Chagnon N. A., Irons W. (Boston: Duxbury Press; ), 462–487.

Mafra A. L., Varella M. A. C., Defelipe R. P., Anchieta N. M., de Almeida C. A. G., Valentova J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Pers. Individ. Differ. 163:110042. 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042 DOI

Marin M. M., Schober R., Gingras B., Leder H. (2017). Misattribution of musical arousal increases sexual attraction towards opposite-sex faces in females. PLoS One 12:e0183531. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183531 PubMed DOI PMC

Martindale C., Locher P., Petrov V. M., Berleant A. (2007). Evolutionary and Neurocognitive Approaches to Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts. New York: Taylor and Francis.

May J. L., Hamilton P. A. (1980). Effects of musically evoked affect on women’s interpersonal attraction toward and perceptual judgments of physical attractiveness of men. Motiv. Emot. 4 217–228. 10.1007/BF00995420 DOI

Menninghaus W. (2019). Aesthetics After Darwin: The Multiple Origins and Functions of Art. Boston: Academic Studies Press.

Miller G. (2000). The Mating Mind. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

Miller G., Tybur J. M., Jordan B. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus? Evol. Hum. Behav. 28 375–381. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.002 DOI

Moraes Y. L., Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C. (2021). The evolution of playfulness, and selection in relation to sex. Front. Psychol. 2022:925842. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925842 PubMed DOI PMC

Mosing M. A., Verweij K. J., Madison G., Pedersen N. L., Zietsch B. P., Ullén F. (2015). Did sexual selection shape human music? Testing predictions from the sexual selection hypothesis of music evolution using a large genetically informative sample of over 10,000 twins. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36 359–366. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.004 DOI

Nettle D., Clegg H. (2006). Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273 611–615. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3349 PubMed DOI PMC

Penke L., Asendorpf J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95:1113. 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 PubMed DOI

Pereira K. J., Varella M. A. C., Kleisner K., Pavlovič O., Valentova J. V. (2019). Positive association between facial and vocal femininity/masculinity in women but not in men. Behav. Process. 164 25–29. 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.04.010 PubMed DOI

Pinker S. (2004). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York, NY: Viking.

Prokosch M. D., Coss R. G., Scheib J. E., Blozis S. A. (2009). Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30 11–20. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.07.004 DOI

Puts D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31 157–175. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005 DOI

Puts D. A., Barndt J. L., Welling L. L., Dawood K., Burriss R. P. (2011). Intrasexual competition among women: vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness. Pers. Individ. Differ. 50 111–115. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.011 DOI

Puts D. A., Hill A. K., Bailey D. H., Walker R. S., Rendall D., Wheatley J. R., et al. (2016). Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283:20152830. 10.1098/rspb.2015.2830 PubMed DOI PMC

Richards R. A. (2019). The Biology of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Röder S., Carbon C.-C., Shackelford T. K., Pisanski K., Weege B., Fink B. (2016). Men’s visual attention and perceptions of women’s dance movements. Pers. Individ. Differ. 101 1–3. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.025 DOI

Saxton T. K., Mackey L. L., McCarty K., Neave N. (2016). A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. Behav. Ecol. 27 512–519. 10.1093/beheco/arv178 PubMed DOI PMC

Schmitt D. P., Pilcher J. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: how do we know one when we see one? Psychol. Sci. 15 643–649. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00734.x PubMed DOI

Semenyna S. W., Gómez Jiménez F. R., VanderLaan D. P., Vasey P. L. (2020). Inter-sexual mate competition in three cultures. PLoS One 15:e0236549. 10.1371/journal.pone.0236549 PubMed DOI PMC

Sluming V. A., Manning J. T. (2000). Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians: evidence for musical ability as an honest signal of male fitness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21 1–9. 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00026-4 DOI

Souza A. L., Conroy-Beam D., Buss D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Pers. Individ. Differ. 95 45–49. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.053 DOI

Souza R. (2004). Is art an adaptation? Prospects for an evolutionary perspective on aesthetic emotions. J. Aesthet. Art Crit. 62 109–118. 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00144.x DOI

Stewart-Williams S., Thomas A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychol. Inq. 24 137–168. 10.1080/1047840X.2013.804899 DOI

Sütterlin C., Schiefenhövel W., Lehmann C., Forster J., Apfelauer G. (2014). “Art as behaviour – an ethological approach to visual and verbal art, music and architecture,” in Hanse Studies, eds Sütterlin C., Schiefenhövel W., Lehmann C., Forster J., Apfelauer G. (Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg; ). PubMed

Thomas A. G., Jonason P. K., Blackburn J. D., Kennair L. E. O., Lowe R., Malouff J., et al. (2020). Mate preference priorities in the east and west: a cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. J. Pers. 88 606–620. 10.1111/jopy.12514 PubMed DOI

Tifferet S., Gaziel O., Baram Y. (2012). Guitar increases male facebook attractiveness: preliminary support for the sexual selection theory of music. Lett. Evol. Behav. Sci. 3 4–6. 10.5178/lebs.2012.18 DOI

Valentova J. V., Junior F. P. M., Štìrbová Z., Varella M. A. C., Fisher M. L. (2020). The association between dark triad traits and sociosexuality with mating and parenting efforts: a cross-cultural study. Pers. Individ. Differ. 154:109613. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109613 DOI

Valentova J. V., Tureček P., Varella M. A. C., Šebesta P., Mendes F. D. C., Pereira K. J., et al. (2019). Vocal parameters of speech and singing covary and are related to vocal attractiveness, body measures, and sociosexuality: a cross-cultural study. Front. Psychol. 10:2029. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02029 PubMed DOI PMC

Valentova J. V., Varella M. A. C., Havlíček J., Kleisner K. (2017). Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study. Behav. Process. 135 95–100. 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005 PubMed DOI

Varella M. A. C. (2021). Evolved features of artistic motivation: analyzing a brazilian database spanning three decades. Front. Psychol. 12:769915. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769915 PubMed DOI PMC

Varella M. A. C., Ferreira J. H. B. P., Cosentino L. A. M., Ottoni E. B., Bussab V. S. R. (2010). Sex differences in aspects of musicality in a brazilian sample: adaptive hypotheses. Cogn. Music. Arts 4 10–16.

Varella M. A. C., Santos I. B. C., Ferreira J. H. B. P., Bussab V. S. R. (2013). Misunderstandings in applying evolution to human mind and behavior and its causes: a systematic review. EvoS J. 5 81–107.

Varella M. A. C., Souza A. A. L., Ferreira J. H. B. P. (2011). Evolutionary aesthetics and sexual selection in the evolution of rock art aesthetics. Rock Art Res. 28 153–163.

Varella M. A. C., Souza A. A. L., Ferreira J. H. B. P. (2012). Considering both proximal and distal explanations for (rock) art production and appreciation as fruitful. Rock Art Res. 29 227–229.

Varella M. A. C., Valentova J. V., Fernández A. M. (2017). “Evolution of artistic and aesthetic propensities through female competitive ornamentation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Female Competition, ed. Fisher M. L. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 757–783. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.46 DOI

Watkins C. D. (2017). Creating beauty: creativity compensates for low physical attractiveness when individuals assess the attractiveness of social and romantic partners. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4:160955. 10.1098/rsos.160955 PubMed DOI PMC

Weege B., Lange B. P., Fink B. (2012). Women’s visual attention to variation in men’s dance quality. Pers. Individ. Differ. 53 236–240. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.011 DOI

Weege B., Pham M. N., Shackelford T. K., Fink B. (2015). Physical strength and dance attractiveness: further evidence for an association in men, but not in women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27 728–730. 10.1002/ajhb.22703 PubMed DOI

Winegard B., Winegard B., Geary D. C. (2018). The status competition model of cultural production. Evol. Psychol. Sci. 4 351–371. 10.1007/s40806-018-0147-7 DOI

Zahavi A., Zahavi A. (1999). The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.