Previous research has shown repeatedly that human stature influences mate preferences and mate choice in heterosexuals. In general, it has been shown that tall men and average height women are most preferred by the opposite sex, and that both sexes prefer to be in a relationship where the man is taller than the woman. However, little is known about such partner preferences in homosexual individuals. Based on an online survey of a large sample of non-heterosexual men (N = 541), we found that the majority of men prefer a partner slightly taller than themselves. However, these preferences were dependent on the participant's own height, such that taller men preferred shorter partners, whereas shorter men preferred taller partners. We also examined whether height preferences predicted the preference for dominance and the adoption of particular sexual roles within a couple. Although a large proportion of men preferred to be in an egalitarian relationship with respect to preferred dominance (although not with respect to preferred sexual role), men that preferred a more dominant and more "active" sexual role preferred shorter partners, whereas those that preferred a more submissive and more "passive" sexual role preferred taller partners. Our results indicate that preferences for relative height in homosexual men are modulated by own height, preferred dominance and sex role, and do not simply resemble those of heterosexual women or men.

Center for Theoretical Study Charles University Prague and the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic

Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences Faculty of Science Charles University Prague

Department of Sociology University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Barber N (1995) The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology 16: 395–424.

Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1–14.

Puts DA (2010) Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 157–175.

Gray JP, Wolfe LD (1980) Height and sexual dimorphism of stature among human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 53: 441–456. PubMed

Courtiol A, Raymond M, Godelle B, Ferdy JB (2010) Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences. Evolution 64: 2189–2203. PubMed

Courtiol A, Picq S, Godelle B, Raymond M, Ferdy JB (2010) From preferred to actual mate characteristics: The case of human body shape. PLoS ONE 5: e13010. PubMed PMC

Kurzban R, Weeden J (2005) HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 227–244.

Stulp G, Buunk AP, Kurzban R, Verhulst S (2013) The height of choosiness: mutual mate choice for stature results in suboptimal pair formation for both sexes. Animal Behaviour 86: 37–46.

Becker NSA, Touraille P, Froment A, Heyer E, Courtiol A (2012) Short stature in African pygmies is not explained by sexual selection. Evolution and Human Behavior 33: 615–622.

Pawlowski B (2003) Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 709–712. PubMed PMC

Pierce CA (1996) Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 24: 143–149.

Swami V, Furnham A, Balakumar N, Williams C, Canaway K, et al. (2008) Factors influencing preferences for height: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences 45: 395–400.

Stulp G, Buunk AP, Pollet TV (2013) Women want taller men more than men want shorter women. Personality and Individuality Differences 54: 877–883.

Sorokowski P, Butovskaya ML (2012) Height preferences in humans may not be universal: Evidence from the Datoga people of Tanzania. Body Image 9: 510–516. PubMed

Sorokowski P, Sorokowska A, Fink B, Mberira M (2011) Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS) might not be universal: Data from a semi nomad population (Himba) in Namibia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43: 32–37.

Feingold A (1992) Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin 112: 125–139. PubMed

Rahman Q, Korhonen M, Aslam A (2005) Sexually dimorphic 2D:4D ratio, height, weight, and their relation to number of sexual partners. Personality and Individual Differences 39: 83–92.

Nettle D (2002) Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 13: 473–491. PubMed

Pawlowski B, Dunbar RIM, Lipowicz A (2000) Evolutionary fitness: Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403: 156. PubMed

Stulp G, Pollet TV, Verhulst S, Buunk AP (2012) A curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success in human males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 375–384. PubMed PMC

Allebeck P, Bergh C (1992) Height, body mass index and mortality: do social factors explain the association? Public Health 106: 375–382. PubMed

Kee F, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Evans A, O’Reilly D, et al. (1997) Short stature and heart disease: nature or nurture? International Journal of Epidemiology 26: 748–756. PubMed

Peck AM, Vågerö DH (1989) Adult body height, self perceived health and mortality in the Swedish population. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 43: 380–384. PubMed PMC

Silventoinen K, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O (1999) Social background, adult body-height and health. International Journal of Epidemiology 28: 911–918. PubMed

Waaler HT (1984) Height, weight and mortality, The Norwegian experience. Acta Medica Scandinavica 215: 1–56. PubMed

Sear R (2010) Height and reproductive success: is bigger always better? In: Frey UJ, Störmer C, Willführ KP, editors. Homo novus: a human without illusions. The Frontiers Collection. Heidelberg: Springer. 127–143.

Michaud DS, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. (2001) Physical activity, obesity, height, and the risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 286: 921–929. PubMed

Salska I, Frederick DA, Pawlowski B, Reilly AH, Laird KT, et al. (2008) Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences 44: 203–215.

Buunk AP, Park JH, Zurriaga R, Klavina L, Massar K (2008) Height predicts jealousy differently for men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 133–139.

Vaz M, Hunsberger S, Diffey B (2002) Prediction equations for handgrip strength in healthy Indian male and female subjects encompassing a wide age range. Annals of Human Biology 29: 131–141. PubMed

Archer J, Thanzami V (2007) The relation between physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Personality and Individual Differences 43: 627–633.

von Rueden C, Gurven M, Kaplan H (2008) The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 402–415. PubMed PMC

Carrier DR (2011) The advantage of standing up to fight and the evolution of habitual bipedalism in hominins. PLoS ONE 6: e19630. PubMed PMC

Hensley WE (1993) Height as a measure of success in academe. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior 30: 40–46.

Judge TA, Cable DM (2004) The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Personality and Individual Differences 89: 428–440. PubMed

Melamed T (1992) Personality correlates of physical height. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 1349–1350.

Fink B, Neave N, Brewer G, Pawlowski B (2007) Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS): Further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Personality and Individual Differences 43: 2249–2257.

Silventoinen K, Kaprio J, Lahelma E, Viken RJ, Rose RJ (2003) Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish Twins and their spouses. American Journal of Human Biology 15: 620–627. PubMed

Godoy R, Eisenberg DTA, Reyes-García V, Huanca T, Leonard WR, et al. (2008) Assortative mating and offspring well-being: theory and empirical findings from a native Amazonian society in Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 201–210.

Stulp G, Buunk AP, Pollet TV, Nettle D, Verhulst S (2013) Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PLoS ONE 8: e54186. PubMed PMC

Stulp G, Verhulst S, Pollet TV, Nettle D, Buunk AP (2011) Parental height differences predict the need for an emergency caesarean section. PLoS ONE 6: e20497. PubMed PMC

Bailey JM, Gaulin S, Agyei Y, Gladue BA (1994) Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 1074–1080. PubMed

Vanderlaan D, Vasey P (2008) Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior 37: 572–585. PubMed

Howard JA, Blumstein P, Schwartz P (1987) Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 194–200.

Hayes AF (2001) Age preferences for same- and opposite-sex partners. Journal of Social Psychology 135: 125–133. PubMed

Silverthorne ZA, Quinsey VL (2000) Sexual partner age preferences of homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 29: 67–76. PubMed

Lippa R (2007) The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior 36: 193–208. PubMed

Bailey JM, Kim P, Hills A, Linsenmeier J (1997) Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 960–973. PubMed

Valentová J, Roberts SC, Havlíček J (2013) Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: the role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. Perception 42: 187–197. PubMed

Glassenberg AN, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, DeBruine LM (2010) Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39: 1289–1296. PubMed

Welling LLM, Singh K, Puts DA, Jones BC, Burriss RP (2013) Self-reported sexual desire in homosexual men and women predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic facial cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior 42: 785–791. PubMed

Zheng L, Hart T, Zheng Y (2013) Attraction to male facial masculinity in gay men in china: Relationship to intercourse preference positions and sociosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior 42: 1223–1232. PubMed

Moskowitz DA, Rieger G, Roloff ME (2008) Tops, bottoms and versatiles. Sexual & Relationship Therapy 23: 191–202.

Carballo-Dieguez A, Dolezal C, Nieves L, Diaz F, Decena C, et al. (2004) Looking for a tall, dark, macho man…sexual-role behaviour variations in Latino gay and bisexual men. Culture, Health & Sexuality 6: 159–171.

Zheng L, Hart TA, Zheng Y (2012) The relationship between intercourse preference positions and personality traits among gay men in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior 41: 683–689. PubMed

Carson RC (1969) Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Adline.

Leary TF (1957) Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.

Fournier MA, Moskowitz DS, Zuroff DC (2002) Social rank strategies in hierarchical relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 425–433. PubMed

Jirkovsky D (2003) Tělesná výška a hmotnost mladých mužů ve věku 18–25 let v druhé polovině 20. století. (Body height and weight of young men between 18 and 25 years of age in the second half of the 20th century). Vojenské zdravotnické listy 72: 217–220.

Todd PM, Penke L, Fasolo B, Lenton AP (2007) Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 15011–15016. PubMed PMC

Štěrbová Z, Valentová J (2012) Influence of homogamy, complementarity, and sexual imprinting on mate choice. Anthropologie 50: 47–59.

Ha T, van den Bergh JEM, Engels RCME, Lichtwarck-Aschoff A (2012) Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 41: 673–682. PubMed

Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2002) Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 269: 1095–1100. PubMed PMC

Puts DA (2005) Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 388–397.

Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ (2002) Validity of selfreported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutrition 5: 561–565. PubMed

Vocal Parameters of Speech and Singing Covary and Are Related to Vocal Attractiveness, Body Measures, and Sociosexuality: A Cross-Cultural Study