AIM: To assess target volume coverage during prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on bony anatomy alignment and to assess possibility of safety margin reduction. BACKGROUND: Implementation of IGRT should influence safety margins. Utilization of cone-beam CT provides current 3D anatomic information directly in irradiation position. Such information enables reconstruction of the actual dose distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen prostate patients were treated with daily bony anatomy image-guidance. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired once a week immediately after bony anatomy alignment. After the prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum and bladder were contoured, the delivered dose distribution was reconstructed. Target dose coverage was evaluated by the proportion of the CTV encompassed by the 95% isodose. Original plans employed a 1 cm safety margin. Alternative plans assuming a smaller 7 mm margin between CTV and PTV were evaluated in the same way. Rectal and bladder volumes were compared with the initial ones. Rectal and bladder volumes irradiated with doses higher than 75 Gy, 70 Gy, 60 Gy, 50 Gy and 40 Gy were analyzed. RESULTS: In 12% of reconstructed plans the prostate coverage was not sufficient. The prostate underdosage was observed in 5 patients. Coverage of seminal vesicles was not satisfactory in 3% of plans. Most of the target underdosage corresponded to excessive rectal or bladder filling. Evaluation of alternative plans assuming a smaller 7 mm margin revealed 22% and 11% of plans where prostate and seminal vesicles coverage, respectively, was compromised. These were distributed over 8 and 7 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sufficient dose coverage of target volumes was not achieved for all patients. Reducing of safety margin is not acceptable. Initial rectal and bladder volumes cannot be considered representative for subsequent treatment.

Department of Medical Biophysics Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Medical Biophysics Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Czech Republic ; Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Radiology University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Bindhu J., Supe S.S., Ramachandra A. Cyberknife: a double edged sword? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010;15(4):93–97. PubMed PMC

van Herk M. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:258–267. PubMed

Ceylan C., Kucuk N., Bas Ayata H., Guden M., Engin K. Dosimetric and physical comparison of IMRT and CyberKnife plans in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010;15(6):181–189. PubMed PMC

Kupelian P.A., Langen K.M., Willoughby T. Image-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treating a moving target. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008;18:58–66. PubMed

Balter J.M., Sandler H.M., Lam K. Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:113–118. PubMed

Schallenkamp J.M., Herman M.G., Kruse J.J. Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:800–811. PubMed

Bajon T., Piotrowski T., Antczak A., Bąk B., Błasiak B., Kaźmierska J. Comparison of dose volume histograms for supine and prone position in patients irradiated for prostate cancer–a preliminary study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2011;16(2):65–70. PubMed PMC

Ghilezan J.M., Jaffray D.A., Siewerdsen J.H. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:406–417. PubMed

Sripadam R., Stratford J., Henry A.M. Rectal motion can reduce CTV coverage and increase rectal dose during prostate radiotherapy: a daily cone-beam CT study. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:312–317. PubMed

Yoo S., Yin F.F. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1553–1561. PubMed

Yang Y., Schreibmann E., Li T. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:685–705. PubMed

van Zijtveld M., Dirkx M., Breuers M. Evaluation of the ‘dose of the day’ for IMRT prostate cancer patients derived from portal dose measurements and cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol. 2010;96:172–177. PubMed

Lee L., Le Q.T., Xing L. Retrospective IMRT dose reconstruction based on cone-beam CT and MLC log-file. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:634–644. PubMed

Wang W., Wu Q., Yan D. Quantitative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in target volume definition for offline image-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010;94:71–75. PubMed PMC

Pawlowski J.M., Yang E.S., Malcolm A.W. Reduction of dose delivered to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients via image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:924–934. PubMed

Hatton J.A., Greer P.B., Tang C. Does the planning dose-volume histogram represent treatment doses in image-guided prostate radiation therapy? Assessment with cone-beam computerised tomography scans. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98:162–168. PubMed

Kasaova L., Sirak I., Jansa J. Daily prostate volume and position monitoring using implanted gold markers and on-board imaging during radiotherapy. Acta Med. 2011;54:149–152. PubMed

Comparing morbidity and cancer control after 3D-conformal (70/74 Gy) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (78/82 Gy) for prostate cancer

Utilization of cone beam CT for reconstruction of dose distribution delivered in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma - bony landmark setup compared to fiducial markers setup