Variation in the number of chromosomes was revealed in 61 samples of Cimex lectularius Linnaeus, 1758 from the Czech Republic and other European countries, hosted on Myotis Kaup, 1829 (4) and Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 (57). The karyotype of all the specimens of Cimex lectularius analysed contained 26 autosomes and a varying number of the sex chromosomes. The number of sex chromosomes showed extensive variation, and up to 20 fragments were recorded. Altogether, 12 distinct karyotypes were distinguished. The male karyotypes consisted of 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 42 and 47 chromosomes. The females usually exhibited the number of chromosomes which was complementary to the number established in the males from the same sample. However, 11 polymorphic samples were revealed in which the karyotypes of females and males were not complementary each other. The complement with 2n = 26+X1X2Y was found in 44% of the specimens and 57,4% samples of bed bugs studied. The karyotypes with higher chromosome numbers as well as individuals with chromosomal mosaics were usually found within the samples exhibiting particularly extensive variation between individuals, and such complements were not found within samples contaning a few or single specimen. The occurrence of chromosomal mosaics with the karyotype constitution varying between cells of single individual was observed in five specimens (4.3%) from five samples. We assume that polymorphism caused by fragmentation of the X chromosome may result in meiotic problems and non-disjunction can produce unbalanced gametes and result in lowered fitness of individuals carrying higher numbers of the X chromosome fragments. This effect should be apparently enhanced with the increasing number of the fragments and this may be the reason for the observed distribution pattern of individual karyotypes in the studied samples and the rarity of individuals with extremely high chromosome numbers. The assumed lowering of the fitness of individuals carrying higher numbers of the X chromosome fragments could affect population dynamics of variable populations.

Charles University Prague Faculty of Science Department of Zoology Viničná 7 CZ 12844 Praha Czech Republic

Institute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Květná 8 CZ 60365 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Balvín O, Kratochvíl L, Vilímová J. (2013) Batbugs (Cimex pipistrelli group, Heteroptera: Cimicidae) are morphologically, but not genetically differentiated among bat hosts. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 10.1111/jzs.12031 DOI

Balvín O, Munclinger P, Kratochvíl L, Vilímová J. (2012) Mitochondrial DNA and morphology show independent evolutionary histories of bedbug Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) on bats and humans. Parasitology Research 111: 457-469.10.1007/s00436-012-2862-5 PubMed DOI

Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, Lopez J, Ganem G, Nunes AC, Ramalhinho MG, Auffray JC, Searle JB, Mathias ML. (2007) Patterns of genic diversity and structure in a species undergoing rapid chromosomal radiation: an allozyme analysis of house mice from the Madeira archipelago. Heredity 99: 432-442.10.1038/sj.hdy.6801021 PubMed DOI

Darlington CD. (1939) The genetical and mechanical properties of the sex chromosomes. V. Cimex and the Heteroptera. Journal of Genetics 39: 101-140.10.1007/BF02982821 DOI

Grozeva S, Kuznetsova V, Anokhin B. (2010) Bed bug cytogenetics: karyotype, sex chromosome system, FISH mapping of 18S rDNA, and male meiosis in Cimex lectularius Linnaeus, 1758 (Heteroptera: Cimicidae). Comparative Cytogenetics 4: 151-160.10.3897/compcytogen.v4i2.36 DOI

Grozeva S, Kuznetsova V, Anokhin B. (2011) Karyotypes, male meiosis and comparative FISH mapping of 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG)n repeat in eight species of true bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Comparative Cytogenetics 5: 355-374.10.3897/compcytogen.v5i4.2307 PubMed DOI PMC

Grozeva S, Nokkala S. (2001) Chromosome numbers, sex determining systems, and patterns of the C-heterochromatin distribution in 13 species of lace bugs (Heteroptera, Tingidae). Folia Biologica (Kraków) 49: 29-41 PubMed

Grozeva S, Nokkala S. (2002) Achiasmatic male meiosis in Cimex sp. (Heteroptera, Cimicidae). Caryologia 55: 189-192.10.1080/00087114.2002.10589276 DOI

Henry TJ. (2009) Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In: Foottit RG, Adler PH. (Eds). Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society.Blackwell Bublishing, Chichester, UK: 223-263

Horn A, Basset P, Yannic G, Banaszek A, Borodin PM, Bulatova NS, Jadwiszczak K, Jones RM, Polyakov AV, Ratkiewicz M, Searle JB, Shchipanov NA, Zima J, Hausser J. (2012) Chromosomal rearrangements do not seem to affect the gene flow in hybrid zones between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution 66: 882-889.10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01478.x PubMed DOI

Hwang SW, Svoboda TJ, De Jong IJ, Kabasele KJ, Gosis E. (2005) Bed bug infestations in an urban environment. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11: 533-538.10.3201/eid1104.041126 PubMed DOI PMC

Ituarte S, Papeschi AG. (2004) Achiasmatic male meiosis in Tenagobia (Fuscagobia) fuscata (Stål) (Heteroptera, Corixoidea, Micronectidae). Genetica 122: 199-206.10.1023/B:GENE.0000041048.75715.68 PubMed DOI

Kuznetsova VG, Grozeva SM, Nokkala S, Nokkala Ch. (2011) Cytogenetics of the true bug infraorder Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera, Heteroptera): a review. ZooKeys 154: 31-70.10.3897/zookeys.154.1953 PubMed DOI PMC

Manna GK. (1984) Chromosomes in evolution in Heteroptera. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A. (Eds). Chromosomes in evolution of eukaryotic groups.CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida: 189-225

Panzera F, Pérez R, Panzera Y, Ferrandis I, Ferreiro MJ, Calleros L. (2010) Cytogenetics and genome evolution in the subfamily Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 128: 77-87.10.1159/000298824 PubMed DOI

Papeschi AG, Bressa MJ. (2006) Evolutionary cytogenetics in Heteroptera. Journal of Biological Research 5: 3-21

Pérez R, Calleros L, Rose V, Lorca M, Panzera F. (2004) Cytogenetic studies on Mepraia gajardoi (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Chromosome behaviour in a spontaneous translocation mutant. European Journal of Entomology 101: 211-218

Péricart J. (1996) Family Cimicidae Latreille, 1802 – bed-bugs. In: Aukema B, Rieger C. (Eds). Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palearctic region, Vol.2. Netherlands Entomological Society, Wageningen, Netherland: 141-144

Poggio MG, Bressa MJ, Papeschi AG, Di Iorio O, Turienzo P. (2009) Insects found in birds´ nests from Argentina: cytogenetic studies in Cimicidae (Hemiptera) and its taxonomical and phylogenetic implications. Zootaxa 2315: 39-46

Rebagliati PJ, Mola LM, Papeschi AG, Grazia J. (2005) Cytogenetic studies in Pentatomidae (Heteroptera): A review. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43: 199-213.10.1111/j.1439-0469.2005.00312.199-213 DOI

Reinhardt K, Siva-Jothy MT. (2007) Biology of the bed bugs (Cimicidae). Annual Review of Entomology 52: 351-374.10.1146/annurev.ento.52.040306.133913 PubMed DOI

Romero A, Potter MF, Potter DA, Haynes KF. (2007) Insecticide resistance in the bed bug: A factor in the pest´s sudden resurgence? Journal of Medical Entomology 44: 175–178. 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[175:IRITBB]2.0.CO;2 PubMed DOI

Ryckman RE, Ueshima N. (1964) Biosystematics of the Hesperocimex complex (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) and avian hosts (Piciformes: Picidae; Passeriformes: Hirundinidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 57: 624-638

Schuh RT, Slater JA. (1995) True bugs of the world (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, XII + 336.

Simov N, Ivanova T, Schunger I. (2006) Bat-parasitic Cimex species (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) on the Balkan Peninsula, with zoogeographical remarks on Cimex lectularius Linnaeus. Zootaxa 1190: 59-68

Slack HD. (1939) Structural hybridity in Cimex L. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, B, Chromosoma 1: 104-118.10.1007/BF01271624 DOI

Szalanski AL, Austin JW, McKern JA, Steelman CD, Gold RE. (2008) Mitochondrial and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 diversity of Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 45: 229-236.10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[229:MARITS]2.0.CO;2 PubMed DOI

Šťáhlavský F, Král J. (2004) Karyotype analysis and achiasmatic meiosis in pseudoscorpions of the family Chthoniidae (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones). Hereditas 140: 49-60.10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01783.x PubMed DOI

Traut W. (1976) Pachytene mapping in the female silkworm Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera). Chromosoma 58: 275-284.10.1007/BF00292094 PubMed DOI

Ueshima N. (1964) Experiments on reproductive isolation in Cimex lectularius and Cimex columbarius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 40: 47-53

Ueshima N. (1966) Cytology and cytogenetics. In: Usinger RB. (Ed). Monograph of Cimicidae (Hemiptera – Heteroptera).Entomological Society of America, Maryland, College Park: 183-237

Ueshima N. (1967) Supernumerary chromosomes in the human bed bug Cimex lectularius Linn. (Cimicidae: Hemiptera). Chromosoma (Berlin) 20: 311-331.10.1007/BF00326188 PubMed DOI

Ueshima N. (1968) Distribution, host relationships and speciation of the genus Paracimex (Cimicidae: Hemiptera). Mushi 42: 15-27

Ueshima N. (1979) Hemiptera II: Heteroptera. In: John B (Ed) Animal Cytogenetics. Vol. 3: Insecta 6. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin-Stuttgart, V + 117.

Usinger RB. (1966) Monograph of Cimicidae (Hemiptera – Heteroptera). Entomological Society of America, Maryland, College Park, XI + 585.

Weeks ENI, Logan JG, Gezan SA, Woodcock CM, Birkett MA, Pickett JA, Cameron MM. (2010) A bioassay for studying behavioural responses of the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) to bed bug-derived volatiles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101: 1-8.10.1017/S0007485309990599 PubMed DOI

Comparison of different cytogenetic methods and tissue suitability for the study of chromosomes in Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera, Cimicidae)

Karyotype diversity of pseudoscorpions of the genus Chthonius (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae) in the Alps