Preliminary study with SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in the prevention of abdominal adhesions

. 2013 Dec ; 8 (4) : 301-9. [epub] 20130506

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid24501599

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal adhesions, the fibrotic bands that form between the surfaces in the peritoneal cavity following surgery, still pose a difficult clinical challenge. AIM: To evaluate the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System (PEG ester amine solution and a buffer solution) in reducing post-operative adhesion formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study. A total of 11 subjects diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) were randomized: 8 to the SprayShield™ arm and 3 to the control arm. SprayShield™ was applied on the viscera directly under the midline peritoneal incision and at the site of ileostomy. During the follow-up surgery, the incidence, extent, and severity of post-operative adhesion formation were evaluated, as well as the time required to mobilize the ileal loop. RESULTS: In patients who received SprayShield™ the time required to mobilize the ileal loop at the ileostomy closure was slightly shorter and the incidence and severity of adhesions were somewhat lower vs. control subjects (NS). CONCLUSIONS: SprayShield™ was found to be easy to use, safe, and quick to apply, and performed well in adherence and conformity. The incidence and severity of adhesions were lower for SprayShield™ subjects vs. control subjects, but due to the limited number of patients there are not enough data to confirm the effectiveness of the SprayShield™ Adhesion Barrier System in prevention of adhesions.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, et al. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:1–9. PubMed

Kot M, Gluszek S, Matykiewicz J, Kotucha B. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy – is it a safe operation method? Our experiences. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2006;1:113–20.

Głuszek S, Bonek Z. State of gallstone videosurgery in Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2008;3:111–8.

Skrovina M, Czudek S, Bartos J, et al. Colorectal cancer complications of laparoscopic resection. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2006;1:142–9.

Jack D. Sticky situations: surgical adhesions and adhesives. Lancet. 1998;351:118. PubMed

Cliff WJ, Grobety J, Tyan GB. Postoperative pericardial adhesions. The role of mild serosal injury and spilled blood. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;65:744–50. PubMed

di Zerega GS. Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tubalplasty ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis, and myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;8:230–7. PubMed

Mazuji MK, Kalambahati K, Powar B. Prevention of adhesions with polyvinylpyrrolidone. Arch Surg. 1964;89:1011–5. PubMed

Özler M, Ersoz N, Özerhan IH, et al. The effect of alpha-lipoic acid in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;2:190–4. PubMed

Galili Y, Ben-Abraham R, Rabau M, et al. Reduction of surgery-induced peritoneal adhesions by methylene blue. Am J Surg. 1998;175:30–2. PubMed

Hemadeh O, Chilukuri S, Bonet V, et al. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions by administration of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and oral vitamin E. Surgery. 1993;114:907–10. PubMed

Ara C, Kirimlioglu H, Karabulut AB, et al. Protective effect of melatonin against oxidative stress on adhesion formation in the rat cecum and uterine horn model. Life Sci. 2005;77:1341–50. PubMed

Mamoudieh M, Mirkheshti N, Sa Alavi. Evaluation of agar films in the prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions in an animal model. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;17:108–12. PubMed

Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:297–306. PubMed

Diamond MP. Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:904–10. PubMed

Salum MR, Lam DT, Wexner SD, et al. Does limited placement of bioresorbable membrane of modified sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) have possible short-term beneficial impact? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:706–12. PubMed

Chu DI, Lim R, Heydrick S, et al. N-acetyl-l-cysteine decreases intra-abdominal adhesion formation through the upregulation of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and antioxidant defenses. Surgery. 2011;149:801–12. PubMed

Zong X, Li S, Chen E, et al. Prevention of postsurgery-induced abdominal adhesions by electrospun bioabsorbable nanofibrous poly(lactide-coglycolide)-based membranes. Ann Surg. 2004;240:910–5. PubMed PMC

Moreno A, Aguayo JL, Zambudio G, et al. Influence of abdominal incision on the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: an experimental study in rats. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:181–5. PubMed

Phillips RK, Dudley HA. The effect of tetracycline lavage and trauma on visceral and parietal peritoneal ultrastructure and adhesion formation. Br J Surg. 1984;71:537–9. PubMed

Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:956–60. PubMed

Zhang QY, Ma S, Xi D, et al. Administration of a novel penicillamine-bound membrane: a preventive and therapeutic treatment for abdominal adhesions. BMC Surgery. 2011;11:5. PubMed PMC

Klingler PJ, Floch NR, Seelig MH, et al. Seprafilm-induced peritoneal inflammation: a previously unknown complication. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1639–43. PubMed

Bowers D, Raybon RB, Wheeless CR., Jr Hyaluronic acidcarboxymethylcellulose film and perianastomotic adhesions in previously irradiated rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1335–8. PubMed

Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E. A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:41–3. PubMed

Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, et al. New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis: a comparative study in the rabbit. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:44–6. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...