The systematic integrity of European Gymnopus subsect. Levipedes is verified based on anatomic-morphological characters with support from DNA sequences of ITS and translation elongation factor 1-alpha genes. Seven species (G. alpinus, G. aquosus, G. dryophilus - including var. lanipes, G. erythropus, G. fagiphilus, G. hybridus, and G. ocior) belonging to this subsection are included. We clarify the concepts of G. dryophilus and G. ocior, which were occasionally confused in older literature. Due to unavailability of previously selected neotype of G. dryophilus the substitute neotype specimen is selected. Gymnopus dryophilus var. lanipes is confirmed as a variety; no important differences from nominotypical variability were detected. All discriminative characters used for identification of these species are discussed in detail. An identification key is also provided.

Department of Botany Moravian Museum Zelný trh 6 CZ 659 37 Brno Czech Republic;

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno Zemědělská 3 CZ 613 00 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Antonín V, Finy P, Tomšovský M. 2012. Taxonomy of the Gymnopus inusitatus group and the new G. inusitatus var. cystidiatus from Hungary. Mycotaxon 119: 219–299

Antonín V, Noordeloos ME. 2010. A monograph of marasmioid and collybioid fungi in Europe. IHW-Verlag, Eching

Courtecuisse R, Duhem B. 1994. Guide des champignons de France et d’Europe. Delachaux & Niestlé, Lausanne

Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, et al. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Research 36 (suppl. 2): W465–W469 PubMed PMC

Gröger F. 2006. Bestimmungsschlüssel für Blätterpilze und Röhrlinge in Europa. Teil I. Regensburger Mykologische Schriften 13: 1–638

Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate Maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59, 3: 307–321 PubMed

Hausknecht A, Krisai-Greilhuber I. 2000. Rüblinge, Schwindlinge und verwandte Taxa in Ostösterreich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde 9: 31–66

Katoh K, Toh H. 2010. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 26, 15: 1899–1900 PubMed PMC

Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JS. 2008. Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of fungi, 10th edn CABI, Wallingford

Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. 1983. Methuen handbook of colour. 3rd ed.Methuen, London

Lutzoni F, Kauff F, Cox CJ, McLaughlin D, Celio G, et al. 2004. Assembling the fungal tree of life: Progress, classification and evolution of subcellular traits. American Journal of Botany 91, 10: 1446–1480 PubMed

Mata JL, Halling RE, Petersen RH. 2004. New species and mating system reports in Gymnopus (Agaricales) from Costa Rica. Fungal Diversity 16: 113–129

Mata JL, Hughes KW, Petersen RH. 2006. An investigation of /omphalotaceae (Fungi: Euagarics) with emphasis of the genus Gymnopus. Sydowia 58: 191–289

Mata JL, Ovrebo CL. 2009. New reports and illustrations of Gymnopus for Costa Rica and Panama. Fungal Diversity 38: 125–131

Noordeloos ME. 2012. Gymnopus (Pers.) Roussel. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J. (eds), Funga Nordica, Copenhagen: 341–349

Nylander JAA. 2008. MrModeltest v2.3. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala

Ortega A, Antonín V, Esteve-Raventós F. 2003. Three interesting thermophilic taxa of Gymnopus (Basidiomycetes, Tricholomataceae): G. pubipes sp. nov., G. pubipes var. pallidopileatus var. nov. and G. dryophilus var. lanipes comb. nov. Mycotaxon 85: 67–75

Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer v1.4, Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh

Rehner SA, Buckley EP. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97: 84–98 PubMed

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 PubMed

Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony 4.0. Version Beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, USA

Thiers B. 2012. [continuously updated]: Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium; http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/

Tomšovský M, Sedlák P, Jankovský L. 2010. Species recognition and phylogenetic relationships of European Porodaedalea (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales). Mycological Progress 9: 225–233

Vienne DM de, Giraud T, Martin OC. 2007. A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees. Bioinformatics 23: 3119–3124 PubMed

Vila J, Llimona X. 2006. Noves dades sobre el component fúngic de les comunitats de Cistus de Catalunya. II. Revista Catalana de Micologia 28: 167–207

Vilgalys R. 1991. Speciation and species concepts in the Collybia dryophila complex. Mycologia 83, 6: 758–773

Vilgalys R, Miller OK. 1987. Morphological studies on the Collybia dryophila group in Europe. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 88, 4: 461–472

Marasmioid and Gymnopoid Fungi of the Republic of Korea. 8. Gymnopus Section Levipedes

Fungal Systematics and Evolution: FUSE 5

Phylogenetic and chemical studies in the potential psychotropic species complex of Psilocybe atrobrunnea with taxonomic and nomenclatural notes