Significance of serum mesothelin in an asbestos-exposed population in the Czech Republic
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
24781044
DOI
10.5507/bp.2014.015
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- asbestos-exposed population, malignant pleural mesothelioma, mesothelin,
- MeSH
- Asbestos adverse effects MeSH
- Asbestosis blood complications epidemiology MeSH
- GPI-Linked Proteins blood MeSH
- Incidence MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mesothelioma, Malignant MeSH
- Mesothelin MeSH
- Mesothelioma blood epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor blood MeSH
- Pleural Neoplasms blood epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Lung Neoplasms blood epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Occupational Exposure adverse effects MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic epidemiology MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Asbestos MeSH
- GPI-Linked Proteins MeSH
- Mesothelin MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
AIMS: Pleural mesothelioma is a highly aggressive and difficult-to-treat form of cancer induced by asbestos in 80-90% of cases. The population group most at risk of the condition are asbestos-exposed workers. Mesothelin or soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) is studied as a potential marker of mesothelioma in the at-risk population. METHODS: The study comprised 239 subjects with a mean duration of occupational exposure to asbestos of 19.9 years. In all of them, a complete medical history was taken, focused on exposure duration and a physical examination, a chest X-ray or other imaging investigations and a lung function test were performed. Their serum SMRP levels were measured and biopsy samples were taken to diagnose pleural disease. Based on the above examinations, the subjects were classified into subgroups and serum SMRP concentrations were statistically analyzed with respect to individual parameters. RESULTS: In asbestos-exposed individuals, mesothelin levels were significantly higher in those with pathological X-ray findings than in those with normal X-ray results (0.78 ± 0.63 vs. 0.50 ± 0.35, P<0.0001). The group of patients with benign disease had statistically significantly higher mesothelin levels than those with normal X-ray findings (0.755 ± 0.543 vs. 0.50 ± 0.35, P<0.001). In the group with present malignant processes, mesothelin levels were higher than in individuals with benign disease (1.19 ± 0.89 vs. 0.76 ± 0.54, P=0.015). Only a weak correlation was found between mesothelin levels and asbestos exposure duration. There were relatively high sensitivity and high specificity (75% and 90.6%, respectively) of serum mesothelin for pleural mesothelioma. However, given the small number of mesothelioma cases in the group, the results cannot be considered as statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In persons followed up for asbestos exposure, increased mesothelin levels signalize pathological processes in the chest and correlate with severity of the disease. The study suggests that mesothelin cannot be considered a reliable marker for the early stage of malignant degeneration of pleural disease but only an additional criterion for examination of the followed-up individuals.
References provided by Crossref.org