Chair rise performance is incorporated in clinical assessments to indicate fall risk status in older persons. This study investigated the test-retest reliability of a pendant-sensor-based assessment of chair rise performance. Forty-one older persons (28 females, 13 males, age: 72-94) were assessed in two sessions with 3 to 8 days in between. Repeated chair rise transfers were measured after different instructions. Relative and absolute test-retest reliability of chair rise measurements in individual tests and average over all tests were evaluated by means of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) as a percentage of the measurement mean. Systematic bias between the measurements in test and retest was examined with paired t-tests. Heteroscedasticity of the measurements was visually checked with Bland-Altman plots. In the different test conditions, the ICCs ranged between 0.63 and 0.93, and the SEM% ranged between 5.7% and 21.2%. The relative and absolute reliability of the average over all tests were ICC = 0.86 and SEM% = 9.5% for transfer duration, ICC = 0.93 and SEM% = 9.2% for maximum vertical acceleration, and ICC = 0.89 and SEM% = 10.0% for peak power. The results over all tests indicated that a fall risk assessment application based on pendant-worn-sensor measured chair rise performance in daily life might be feasible.

Center for Human Movement Sciences University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Antonius Deusinglaan 1 Groningen 9713 AV The Netherlands

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Nám Sítná 3105 Kladno 2 272 01 Czech Republic

Personal Health Solutions Department Philips Research Europe High Tech Campus 34 Eindhoven 5656AE The Netherlands

See more in PubMed

Tinetti M.E., Speechley M., Ginter S.F. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988;319:1701–1707. PubMed

Ni Scanaill C., Garattini C., Greene B.R., McGrath M.J. Technology innovation enabling falls risk assessment in a community setting. Ageing Int. 2011;36:217–231. PubMed PMC

Shubert T.E., Smith M.L., Prizer L.P., Ory M.G. Complexities of fall prevention in clinical settings: A commentary. Gerontologist. 2013 doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt079. PubMed DOI

Lord S.R., Menz H.B., Tiedemann A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys. Ther. 2003;83:237–252. PubMed

Hendrich A.L., Bender P.S., Nyhuis A. Validation of the Hendrich II fall risk model: A large concurrent case/control study of hospitalized patients. Appl. Nurs. Res. ANR. 2003;16:9–21. PubMed

Bean J.F., Kiely D.K., Herman S., Leveille S.G., Mizer K., Frontera W.R., Fielding R.A. The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older people. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002;50:461–467. PubMed

Skelton D.A., Greig C.A., Davies J.M., Young A. Strength, power and related functional ability of healthy people aged 65–89 years. Age Ageing. 1994;23:371–377. PubMed

Perry M.C., Carville S.F., Smith I.C.H., Rutherford O.M., Newham D.J. Strength, power output and symmetry of leg muscles: Effect of age and history of falling. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;100:553–561. PubMed

Tinetti M.E. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1986;34:119–126. PubMed

Zijlstra W., Bisseling R.W., Schlumbohm S., Baldus H. A body-fixed-sensor-based analysis of power during sit-to-stand movements. Gait Post. 2010;31:272–278. PubMed

Regterschot G.R.H., Folkersma M., Zhang W., Baldus H., Stevens M., Zijlstra W. Sensitivity of sensor-based sit-to-stand peak power to the effects of training leg strength, leg power and balance in older adults. Gait Post. 2014;39:303–307. PubMed

Regterschot G.R.H., Zhang W., Baldus H., Stevens M., Zijlstra W. Test–retest reliability of sensor-based sit-to-stand measures in young and older adults. Gait. Post. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.193. PubMed DOI

Giansanti D., Maccioni G. Physiological motion monitoring: A wearable device and adaptative algorithm for sit-to-stand timing detection. Physiol. Meas. 2006;27:713–723. PubMed

Fujimoto M., Chou L.-S. Dynamic balance control during sit-to-stand movement: An examination with the center of mass acceleration. J. Biomech. 2012;45:543–548. PubMed

Shumway-Cook A., Brauer S., Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys. Ther. 2000;80:896–903. PubMed

Buatois S., Miljkovic D., Manckoundia P., Gueguen R., Miget P., Vançon G., Perrin P., Benetos A. Five times sit to stand test is a predictor of recurrent falls in healthy community-living subjects aged 65 and older. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008;56:1575–1577. PubMed

Hof A.L. Scaling gait data to body size. Gait. Post. 1996;4:222–223.

Altman D.G., Bland J.M. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307.

Bruton A., Conway J.H., Holgate S.T. Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86:94–99.

Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979;86:420–428. PubMed

Wang C., Sheu C., Protas E. Test-retest reliability and measurement errors of six mobility tests in the community-dwelling elderly. Asian J. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2009;4:8–13.

Goldberg A., Chavis M., Watkins J., Wilson T. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: Validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging. Clin. Exp. Res. 2012;24:339–344. PubMed