The diversity of yeasts associated with grapes and musts of the Strekov winegrowing region, Slovakia

. 2015 Mar ; 60 (2) : 103-9. [epub] 20140925

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25253264

Many different yeast species have been isolated from grapes and musts worldwide. The diversity and frequency of yeasts depend on a number of factors such as the grape variety, the physical damage of the grapes, the weather conditions and the chemical composition of must. A total of 366 isolates were associated with the three grape cultivars: Blue Frankish, Green Veltliner and Sauvignon blanc over four consecutive years. Yeast cultures were isolated from the grapes and from the fermenting musts after the first and seventh days. The ascomycetous yeasts of the genera Aureobasidium, Candida, Hanseniaspora, Metschnikowia, Pichia, Saccharomyces and Saccharomycopsis together with basidiomycetous yeasts of the genera Cryptococcus, Dioszegia, Filobasidium, Rhodotorula and Sporidiobolus were associated with the three grape varieties. Hanseniaspora uvarum, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kluyveri, Pichia kudriavzevii and Sporidiobolus pararoseus were found on the berries in significant amounts. P. kluyveri and P. kudriavzevii were more associated with the damaged grapes, whereas Sp. pararoseus with intact ones. H. uvarum and M. pulcherrima were present on both types of grapes almost equally. The yeast composition and quantitative representation of yeast species varied over the grape varieties and the years examined. Although the basidiomycetous species formed a significant proportion of the yeast population in some individual grape variety/year combinations, the ascomycetous species were dominant.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Feb 15;153(3):243-59 PubMed

FEMS Yeast Res. 2006 Mar;6(2):305-11 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Sep 1;86(1-2):11-22 PubMed

Microbiol Res. 2002;157(4):267-74 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Apr 1;99(3):237-43 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Oct;72(10):6716-24 PubMed

Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug;27(5):559-67 PubMed

FEMS Yeast Res. 2008 Nov;8(7):1063-75 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1274-80 PubMed

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013 Jan;169(2):493-501 PubMed

Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:540465 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 May 25;109(1-2):97-102 PubMed

FEMS Yeast Res. 2006 Jan;6(1):102-11 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Feb 15;161(3):240-6 PubMed

Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 May;75(1):149-64 PubMed

FEMS Yeast Res. 2004 Sep;4(8):865-77 PubMed

Food Microbiol. 2013 Dec;36(2):335-42 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 2012 Dec;58(12):1344-52 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Sep 1;86(1-2):201-7 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 31;145(1):132-9 PubMed

Food Microbiol. 2012 Sep;31(2):159-66 PubMed

FEMS Yeast Res. 2010 Aug 1;10(5):619-30 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Jun 30;117(2):201-10 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 May;35(5):1216-23 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...